Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 12;50:e20233397. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233397-en

Table 3. Adverse events by group and surgical technique.

Group
Surgical technique Variable Study group n (%) Control group n (%) p-value
BGYR Severe complications 8 (5,63) 7 (4,86) p1 =0,769
GV 2 (5,88) 1 (2 .7) p1 =0,505
p-valor p3 =0,955 p3 =0,299
BGYR Cholelithiasis 22 (15,5) 20 (13,9) p1 =0,702
GV 8 (22.2) 7 (18,9) p1 =0,727
p-valor p3 =0,335 p3 =0,444
BGYR Anemia 17 (12,0) 24 (16,7)
GV 2 (5,6) 1 (2,7) p3 =0,017*
p-valor p4 =0,372 p3 =0,031*
BGYR Bowel obstruction 4 (2,8) 6 (4.2) p1 =0,750
GV - - **
p-valor p3 =0,584 p3 =0,349
BGYR Marginal ulcer 3 (2.1) 3 (2.1) p1 =1,000
GV 2 (5,6) 1 (2,7) p1 =0,615
p-valor p3 =0,266 p3 =1,000
BGYR Úlcera marginal 6 (4.2) 3 (2.1) p1 =0,333
GV - - **
p-valor ** **
Group
Surgical technique Variable Study group n (%) Control group n (%) p-value
Death (up to 30 days) 3 (2.1) p1 =0,023*
BGYR Anastomotic leak 1 (0,7) -
Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) 1 (0,7) -
Cardiovascular 1 (0,7) -

*Significant difference at the level of 5.0%; 1Pearson’s chi-square test for comparison between groups; 2Fisher’s exact test for comparison between groups; 3Pearson’s chi-square test to compare surgical techniques.