Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 19;14:148. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01484-9

Table 2.

Comparison between hamartoma and carcinoid tumors

Population characteristics Hamartoma n = 38 Carcinoid tumor n = 89 p-value
Age (years) 58 [49–67] 60 [45–68] p = 0.93
Gender
 Male 21 (55%) 18 (20%) p = 0.01
 Female 17 (45%) 71 (80%)
Type of surgery
 Pneumonectomy 0 (0%) 4 (4%) p = 0.01
 Lobectomy 8 (21%) 68 (76%)
 Segmentectomy 0 (0%) 10 (11%)
 Wedge resection 22 (58%) 7 (9%)
 Enucleation 7 (18%) 0 (0%)
 Biopsy 1 (3%) 0 (0%)
Diameter (mm) 14 [10–24] 18 [12–26] p = 0.03
Calcifications 11 (44%) 11 (18%) p = 0.02
Anatomic location
 Central 10 (26%) 46 (52%) p = 0.01
 Peripheral 28 (74%) 43 (48%)
Bronchial contact 10 (26%) 63 (71%) p = 0.01
Endobronchial protrusion 4 (11%) 39 (44%) p = 0.01
Atelectasis 2 (5%) 28 (31%) p = 0.01
Borders shape
 Smooth 22 (58%) 59 (66%) p = 0.37
 Lobulated 16 (42%) 30 (34%)
Mean 2DROI value (HU) 28 [17–36] 79 [55–105] p = 0.01

Demographic and clinical data. Results were expressed in median [Q1-Q3] for quantitative data or number (percentage) for qualitative data. ‘n = ’ corresponds to the number of patients operated. HU—Hounsfield units. A p-value lower than 0.05 was considered as significant. p-value < 0.05 was highlighted in bold