Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 3;38(8):1837–1850. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02571-6

Table 2.

Quantitative assessment of myocardial mass, scar mass, and LGE extent

2D-LGE 3D-LGE Bias ± SD r
CMI
 Global myocardial mass (g) 87.3 ± 24.1 94.9 ± 26.1 – 7.6 ± 11.7 (p < 0.01) 0.93 (p < 0.01)
 Global scar mass (g) 10.3 ± 8.7 11.1 ± 9.5 – 0.8 ± 3.2 (p = 0.06) 0.94 (p < 0.01)
 Global LGE extent (%) 11.4 ± 7.5 11.5 ± 8.5 – 0.1 ± 3.2 (p = 0.99) 0.93 (p < 0.01)
MYC
 Global myocardial mass (g) 64.7 ± 14.7 70.2 ± 18.9 – 5.4 ± 7.7 (p < 0.05) 0.92 (p < 0.01)
 Global scar mass (g) 18.1 ± 12.2 19.0 ± 11.6 – 0.9 ± 4.4 (p = 0.40) 0.93 (p < 0.01)
 Global LGE extent (%) 27.0 ± 15.7 26.2 ± 13.1 0.8 ± 6.7 (p = 0.70) 0.91 (p < 0.01)

CMI chronic myocardial infarction, MYC Myocarditis, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, r Pearson correlation coefficient between 2D-LGE and 3D-LGE