Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 15;13(4):127–135.

Table 1.

Comparison of sensitivity and specificity rates of index tests in different studies

Study Year Study type Study population Mean of age, year ± SD Type of LVV CRP/ESR available Reference standard Index test Performance
Blockmans et al. 2000 Retrospective 69 69 ± 9 GCA Yes Clinical criteria and positive TAB Visual intensity of FDG uptake Sensitivity: 56%
Specificity: 98%
PPV: 93%
NPV: 80%
Soussan et al. 2015 Meta-analysis 127 55.4 ± 11 GCA Yes ACR criteria or positive TAB Visual intensity of FDG uptake GCA:
Sensitivity: 90%
Specificity: 98%
PRL: 28.7
NRL: 0.15
Lariviere et al. 2016 Prospective 24 72.7 (51-85) GCA Yes Positive TAB Visual intensity of FDG uptake Sensitivity: 66%
Specificity: 100%
PPV: 100%
NPV: 64%
Sammel et al. 2019 Prospective 64 69 (50-90) GCA Yes Positive TAB Visual intensity of FDG uptake Sensitivity: 92%
Specificity: 85%
PPV: 61%
NPV: 98%
AUC: 88%
Santhosh et al. 2014 Retrospective 51 30 ± 12 TA Yes ACR criteria Intensity of FDG uptake Sensitivity: 83%
Specificity: 90%

PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likehood ratio; NLR, negative likehood ratio; AUC, area under the curve; TAB, temporal artery biopsy.