Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 3;14(5):1131–1144. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.06.001

TABLE 3.

Population studies examining the effect of resistant starch on the intestinal microbiota

Type Duration and dose Population Microbial groups showing alterations
RS2 [128] 3 wk, 33 g/d 13 healthy human subjects Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Parabacteroides distasonis, Bifidobacterium adolescentis
Firmicutes, Ruminococcaceae, Faecalibacterium↓
RS4 [128] Ruminococcus bromii, Eubacterium rectale
RS3 [129] 3 wk, 25.56 g/d 14 overweight men Ruminococcus bromii, Eubacterium rectale
RS3 [130] 3 wk, 20 g/d 14 obese men Ruminococcaceae↑, Papillibacter cinnamivorans
RS2 [131] 4 wk, 8.5 g/d 18 children Actinobacteria, Lactobacillus
Firmicutes, Roseburia, Blautia, Lachnospiraceae incertae sedis
RS2 [132] 3 wk, 24 g/d 20 young adults Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Ruminococcus bromii, Eubacterium rectale
RS2 [133] 12 wk, 21 g/d 84 older and middle-aged adults Bifidobacterium
RS2 [134] 4 wk, 40 g/d 19 normal weight subjects Ruminococcaceae_UCG-005↑
RS2 [135] 4 wk, 20 g/d;
4 wk, 25 g/d
9 ESRD subjects Faecalibacterium
RS2 [136] 2 wk, 20–34 g/d 174 healthy young adults Ruminococcus bromii, Clostridium chartatabidum, Eubacterium rectale
RS2 [137] 4 wk, 16 g/d 10 HD subjects Roseburia, Ruminococcus gauvreauii
RS2 [138] 1 wk, 14–19 g/d 30 healthy adults Ruminococcus, Gemmiger

Abbreviations: ↑: Increased; ↓: Decreased; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; HD, hemodialysis; RS, resistant starch.