Skip to main content
. 2023 May 5;14(5):1029–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.05.004

TABLE 1.

Included studies and the type of nut analyzed (n = 139)

Type of nut Number of studies n Participants n Female % Mean age (y) Mean duration (wk) Mean nut dose (g/d) Participant health status
Almond 36 2276 58 47 12 58 1 CVD or at CVD risk, 1 multiple health conditions, 2 CAD, 2 prediabetic, 4 T2DM, 6 hypercholesterolemia/hyperlipidemia, 8 healthy, and 12 overweight/obese
Brazil nut 4 216 69 49 11 14 1 MetS or at risk of MetS, 1 overweight/obese, and 2 multiple health conditions
Cashew nut 4 394 59 54 7 37 2 healthy and 2 T2DM
hazelnut 7 393 56 41 8 37 1 healthy, 1 multiple health conditions, 1 T2DM, 2 hypercholesterolemia/hyperlipidemia, and 2 overweight/obese
Macadamia 6 237 57 40 5 49 1 overweight/obese, 2 hypercholesterolemia/hyperlipidemia, and 3 healthy
Peanut 10 895 46 45 14 58 1 prediabetic, 1 MetS or at risk of MetS, 1 T2DM, 2 healthy, 2 hypercholesterolemia/hyperlipidemia, and 3 overweight/obesity
Pecan 6 272 51 50 8 58 1 CAD, 1 CVD or at CVD risk, 1 hypercholesterolemia/hyperlipidemia, 1 overweight/obese, and 2 healthy
Pistachio 14 652 56 49 12 62 1 healthy, 1 prediabetic, 2 MetS or at risk of MetS, 2 overweight/obese, 3 T2DM, and 5 hypercholesterolemia/hyperlipidemia
Walnut 39 2824 52 52 16 38 1 prediabetic, 1 multiple health conditions, 2 CVD or CVD risk, 3 MetS or at risk of MetS, 5 T2DM, 7 overweight/obese, 9 hypercholesterolemia/hyperlipidemia, and 11 healthy
Mixed nuts 11 858 49 47 35 45 1 CAD, 1 multiple health conditions, 1 T2DM, 2 MetS, 3 healthy, and 3 overweight/obese
Different study arms compared different nuts (for example, group 1 consumed almonds, and group 2 consumed walnuts) 2 82 52.5 51 6 69 1 hypercholesterolemia/hyperlipidemia and 1 MetS or at risk of MetS
Total (all nuts) 139 9099 54 48 14 48

Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; MetS, metabolic syndrome; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.