Table 6.
Comparison of the 4 TAME-ChatGPTa usage constructs stratified by participants’ variables.
| Variables and constructs | Perceived usefulness | Perceived risk | Perceived ease of use | Behavior | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
Mean (SD) | Median (IQR) | P value | Mean (SD) | Median (IQR) | P value | Mean (SD) | Median (IQR) | P value | Mean (SD) | Median (IQR) | P value | |||
| Age |
|
|
.06 |
|
|
.78 |
|
|
.39 | 10 (3.7) | 10 (8-14) | .58 | ||||
|
|
18-20 | 25.6 (5.1) | 27(22-30) |
|
7.4 (3.5) | 7 (5-11) |
|
9.2 (1.1) | 10 (8-10) |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
>20 | 23.3 (4.6) | 23(21-27) |
|
7 (2.3 | 6.5 (6-8) |
|
8.7 (1.8) | 10 (8-10) |
|
9.6 (3.2) | 9 (8-12) |
|
|||
| Sex |
|
|
.81 |
|
|
.14 |
|
|
.69 |
|
|
.51 | ||||
|
|
Male | 24.1 (4.6) | 24 (22-28) |
|
7.5 (3) | 7.5 (6-9) |
|
9 (1.3) | 10 (8-10) |
|
10 (3.3) | 10 (8-12) |
|
|||
|
|
Female | 24.3 (5.5) | 27 (21-29) |
|
6.5 (2.5) | 6 (5-7) |
|
8.9 (2) | 10 (8-10) |
|
9.4 (3.5) | 9 (7-12) |
|
|||
| Nationality |
|
|
.16 |
|
|
.95 |
|
|
.45 |
|
|
.45 | ||||
|
|
Jordanian | 23.4 (4.9) | 23 (21-27) |
|
7.2 (2.7) | 6.5 (5-9) |
|
9 (1.7) | 10 (8-10) |
|
9.4 (3.4) | 9.5(6-12) |
|
|||
|
|
Non-Jordanian | 25.1 (4.9) | 26 (22-29) |
|
7.1 (3) | 7 (5-8) |
|
8.8 (1.4) | 10 (8-10) |
|
10.2 (3.3) | 10 (8-12) |
|
|||
| University |
|
|
.91 |
|
|
.80 |
|
|
.52 |
|
|
.14 | ||||
|
|
Public | 24.1 (4.9) | 24 (21-28) |
|
7.1 (3) | 7 (5-9) |
|
9 (1.6) | 10 (8-10) |
|
10 (3.2) | 10 (8-12) |
|
|||
|
|
Private | 24.7 (5.4) | 27.5 (20-28) |
|
7.2 (1.7) | 7 (6-8) |
|
8.5 (1.8) | 9 (7-10) |
|
7.8 (3.8) | 6 (5-11) |
|
|||
| Educational level |
|
|
.19 |
|
|
.65 |
|
|
.66 |
|
|
.91 | ||||
|
|
Undergraduate | 24.4 (5) | 24 (22-29) |
|
7.2 (2.9) | 7 (5-9) |
|
9 (1.6) | 10 (8-10) |
|
9.7 (3.5) | 10 (8-13) |
|
|||
|
|
Postgraduate | 22.3 (3.1) | 22 (21-24) |
|
6.7 (2.3) | 6 (6-7) |
|
8.7 (1.6) | 9 (8-10) |
|
9.8 (2.6 | 10.5 (8-12) |
|
|||
aTAME-ChatGPT: Technology Acceptance Model Edited to Assess ChatGPT Adoption.