Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 27;2(4):100159. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100159

Table I.

Clinical, immunologic, and treatment features of patients in the present study with distinct CSU endotypes

Parameter Patients with CSU (n = 394) Type I n = 151 (38%) Type IIb n = 35 (9%) Type I/type IIb overlap n = 201 (51%) Non–type I/type IIb n = 7 (2%) P value
Age (y), mean (± SD) 43 (± 16) 42 (± 16) 46 (± 17) 43 (± 15) 42 (± 22) .67
Sex
 Female, no. (%) 324 (82.2%) 116 (76.8%) 27 (77.1%) 175 (87%) 6 (85.7%) .06
 Male, no. (%) 70 (17.7%) 35 (23.1%) 8 (22.8%) 26 (12.9%) 1 (14.2%)
Age at onset of symptoms (y), mean (± SD) 34 (± 17) 34 (± 15) 39 (± 21) 33 (± 16) 44 (± 19) .24
Age at diagnosis (y), mean (± SD) 40 (± 16) 39 (± 14) 45 (± 21) 39 (± 15) 51 (± 15) .1
Presence of angioedema, no. (%) 295 (74.8%) 122 (80.7%) 23 (65.7%) 144 (71.6%) 6 (85.7%) .11
Presence of CIndU, no. (%) 126 (31.9%) 49 (32.4%) 9 (25.7%) 66 (32.8%) 2 (28.5%) .9
d-Dimer
 High (≥500 ng/mL), no. (%) 40 of 99 (40.4%) 11 of 34 (32.3%) 6 of 10 (60%) 42.5 of 54 (57.4%) 0 of 1 (0%) .35
 Mean ng/mL, (± SD) 605 (±614) 583 (± 484) 622 (± 389) 623 (± 722) 190 .37
Eosinophils
 Eosinopenia (<0.05 × 109/L), no. (%) 16 of 388 (4.1%) 2 of 149 (1.3%) 0 of 35 (0%) 14 of 197 (7.1%) 0 of 7 (0%) .04
 Eosinophil count × 109/L (± SD) 0.199 (± 0.176) 0.218 (± 0.186) 0.142 (± 0.148) 0.195 (± 0.173) 0.171 (± 0.111) .04§
Worsening with NSAIDs, no. (%) 86 of 357 (24%) 35 of 136 (26.4%) 6 of 30 (20%) 42 of 185 (22.7%) 3 of 6 (50%) .4
Updosing second-generation H1 antihistamines (2×, 3×, or 4×) 268 of 389 (68.8%) 100 of 150 (66.6%) 24 of 35 (68.5%) 140 of 197 (71%) 4 of 7 (57.1%) .69
Use of omalizumab, no. (%) 39 (9.8%) 18 (11.9%) 5 (14.5%) 16 (7.9%) 0 (0%) .41
Fast responders to omalizumab, no. (%) 29 of 39 (74.3%) 14 of 18 (77.7%) 5 of 5 (100%) 10 of 16 (62.5%) 0 (0%) .46

Boldface indicates statistical significance.

CIndU, Chronic inducible urticaria; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

ASST performed in 61.7% of the patients (243 of 394).

Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test.

Fisher exact test.

§

After the Dunn test, type I and type I/type IIb overlap were shown to be different from type IIb and non–type I/type IIb.