Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 6;1(4):217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2022.07.005

Table III.

List of top OTUs associated with health status

OTU Health status Blast (%) LDA P value§
OTU2 Controls Faecalibacterium prautsnitzii (98) 4.57 .011
OTU241 Controls Bacteroides ovatus (99) 4.08 .015
OTU34 Patients with FPIES Eubacterium hallii (98) 4.03 .032
OTU50 Controls Parabacteroides distasonis (100) 3.52 .032
OTU46 Patients with FPIES Spiroplasmas abaudiense (84) 3.49 .006
OTU42 Patients with FPIES Ruminococcus albus (93) 3.47 <.001
OTU37 Controls Intestinimonas spp (95) 3.38 .043
OTU540 Controls Bacteroides caccae (99) 3.35 .029
OTU23 Controls Enterococcus hirae (100) 3.33 .023
OTU26 Controls Parabacteroides merdae (100) 3.25 .026
OTU47 Controls Lactobacillus hominis (100) 3.22 .009
OTU59 Controls Weisella confusa (100) 3.19 .007
OTU68 Controls Ruminococcus spp (96) 3.18 .002
OTU83 Patients with FPIES Parabacteroides goldsteinii (100) 3.13 .034
OTU73 Patients with FPIES Lactococcus taiwanensis (100) 3.00 .006
OTU105 Patients with FPIES Blautia spp (96) 3.00 .032

Association based on the higher abundance of the respective OTU (in either the controls or patients with FPIES).

Taxonomy assignment on the basis of best hit against the National Center for Biotechnology Information 16S reference database, taking into account the complete alignment of the OTU sequence.

Taxonomy assignment based on a sequence identity. Only scores higher than 97% are shown, indicating reliable taxonomy identifications.

§

LDA and P value according to LDA effect size analysis.