Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Feb 17;87(3):661–663. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.02.021

Table 1.

Comparison of Wound Healing and Patient Characteristics by Study Grouping

Group A − healthier group + standard wound care (2019+2020)
(n=32)
Group B − suboptimal group + standard wound care (2019)
(n=25)
Group C − suboptimal group + standard wound care + topical timolol (2020)
(n=18)
Age, Mean (standard deviation) 64.3 (5.1) 78.4 (6.4) 75.3 (5.6)
Average Post-op Wound Size, mm2 (SD) 174 (93) 172 (50) 259 (129)
Wound Thickness Partial 25 (78.1%) 21 (84%) 13 (72.2%)
Full 7 (21.9%) 4 (16%) 5 (27.8%)
Time to Re-Epithelization, weeks (SD) 7.7 (2.0) 10.8 (4.2) 7.9 (3.0)
Clinical Characteristics, No. (%)
Atrophic skin 3 (9.4%) 12 (48%) 12 (66.7%)
Varicose veins 4 (12.5%) 13 (52%) 5 (27.8%)
Edematous lower extremities§ 3 (9.4%) 16 (64%) 10 (55.6%)
Stasis dermatitis/ changes§ 1 (3.1%) 3 (12%) 7 (38.9%)
Comorbidities, No. (%)
Current/Former smoker 6 (18.8%) 7 (28%) 5 (27.8%)
Diabetes mellitus 1 (3.1%) 4 (16%) 1 (5.6%)
Hypertension / heart disease§ 7 (21.9%) 20 (80%) 12 (66.7%)
Immuno-suppression 2 (6.3%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%)
Deep vein thrombosis history 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 1 (5.6%)

P-value* for the difference in means of groups A and B = 0.910; groups B and C = 0.004; groups A and C = 0.010.

P-value* for the difference in means of groups A and B = 0.001; groups B and C = 0.012; groups A and C = 0.773

§

Statistically significant difference in characteristic 104 found across groups via Chi-squared analysis.