Table 6.
Comparison of the proposed SIMO with the existing literature.
| Reference | Power amplifier | Controller complexity | Response time | Switching frequency | Driver circuits | No. of switches | Output power | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | Class E | Medium | Slow | 2 MHz | 3 | 2 | 6 W | 84% |
| 30 | SIMO | High | Medium | 25 KHz | 2 | 9 | 462 mW | 89.2% |
| 31 | DIDO | High | Slow | 10 KHz | 2 | 6 | <15 W | 92.5% |
| 32 | SIMO | Low | Fast | 25 KHz | 1 | 4 | 12 W | 91.9% |
| 34 | Class E | High | Slow | 20 KHz | 1 | 2 | 5 W | 82% |
| 35 | Class D | Low | Slow | 10 KHz | 2 | 24 | 18 W | 78% |
| 36 | Class A | Low | Medium | 10 KHz | 2 | 8 | <1 W | 80% |
| 37 | SITO | High | Medium | 5–10 KHz | 2 | 6 | 195 W | 87% |
| 41 | SITO | Low | Slow | 500 KHz | 2 | 6 | 2.4 W | 88.75% |
| 52 | SITO | Low | Fast | 80 KHz | 2 | 9 | 8.4 W | 84.6% |
| This work | SITO | Low | Fast | 20 KHz | 1 | 4 | 100.7, 21.7 W | 90.90% |
SITO: single inductor three output; SIMO: Single Inductor Multiple Output.