Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 20;13:15572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42297-6

Table 3.

Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of seated and standing blood pressures.

Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI)
2017 ACC/AHA guideline for hypertension
 Seated SBP 43 (28–58)% 92 (86–98)% 72 (54–90)% 76 (68–84)%
 Standing SBP 71* (58–85)% 67* (56–76)% 52 (39–65)% 82 (73–91)%
 Seated DBP 45 (30–60)% 83 (75–91)% 58 (41–74)% 75 (66–84)%
 Standing DBP 67* (52–81)% 70* (71–90)% 53 (40–66)% 81 (71–90)%
2023 ESH guideline for hypertension
 Seated SBP 42 (22–61)% 97 (94–100)% 77 (54–100)% 88 (81–94)%
 Standing SBP 83* (68–98)% 60* (51–70)% 33 (21–45)% 94 (88–100)%
 Seated DBP 29 (11–47)% 99 (97–100)% 88 (65–100)% 85 (79–92)%
 Standing DBP 58* (39–78)% 77* (69–85)% 38 (22–53)% 89 (82–95)%

*Statistically significant difference when compared to seated BP (P < 0.05).

Optimal cutoffs derived from Youden’s index for standing BP: 124/81 mmHg (based on 2017 ACC/AHA Guidelines).

Optimal cutoffs derived from Youden’s index for standing BP: 123.5/83.5 mmHg (based on 2023 ESH Guidelines).

ACC American College of Cardiology, AHA American Heart Association, BP blood pressure, CI confidence interval, DBP diastolic BP, ESH European Society of Hypertension, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, SBP systolic BP.