Skip to main content
. 2023 May 1;33(10):7160–7167. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09665-2

Table 2.

Dice and 95% Hausdorff’s distance split and compared among groups

Dice
(mean ± SD)
95% Hausdorff’s distance (mean ± SD)
HC MSA PD HC MSA PD
AAL3 0.78 ± 0.02 0.63 ± 0.09 0.75 ± 0.04 2.78 ± 0.37 4.86 ± 1.19 3.43 ± 0.95
Freesurfer 0.86 ± 0.02 0.76 ± 0.06 0.84 ± 0.04 1.79 ± 0.41 3.84 ± 1.08 2.55 ± 0.98
Fastsurfer 0.88 ± 0.01 0.78 ± 0.06 0.86 ± 0.04 1.78 ± 0.48 3.61 ± 1.01 2.60 ± 1.09
DNP 0.97 ± 0.01 0.93 ± 0.03 0.96 ± 0.01 0.80 ± 0.25 1.03 ± 0.19 0.84 ± 0.33
HC vs. MSA HC vs. PD MSA vs. PD HC vs. MSA HC vs. PD MSA vs. PD
AAL3  < .001 0.26  < .001  < .001 0.06  < .001
Freesurfer  < .001 0.12  < .001  < .001 0.02  < .001
Fastsurfer  < .001 0.18  < .001  < .001 0.02  < .001
DNP  < .001 0.54  < .001 0.03 0.88 0.01

Intergroup differences were assessed through analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s honest significance test. AAL3 automatic anatomic labelling; DNP Deep Neural Patchwork; HC healthy controls; MSA multiple system atrophy; PD Parkinson’s disease