Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 6;11(3):127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.01.004

Table 3.

The oncologic outcomes of LDR brachytherapy using a definition of surgery (PSA >0.2 ng/mL)

Number of patients Procedure Definition Median follow-up Outcomes
Critz et al14 (2013) 3546 LDR + EBRT 3 consecutive increase (Less than 5 years)
Thereafter 0.2 ng/mL
11 yr 10-yr DFS
Low: 93%
Int: 74%
High: 44%
Tanaka et al15 (2017) 445 LDR ± EBRT (n = 445) vs. IMRT (n = 165) 0.2 ng/mL 75 mo 5-yr BCR-free rate
LDR vs. IMRT
Low: 77% vs. 38%
P = 0.001
Int: 79% vs. 37%
P < 0.001
High: 84% vs. 69%
P < 0.001
Morris et al16 (ASCENDE-RT) (2018) 398 DE-EBRT (n = 195) vs. LDR + EBRT (n = 188) 0.2 ng/mL 78 mo 7-yr bPFS
LDR vs. DE-EBRT
Int: 91% vs. 40%
High: 81% vs. 34%
P < 0.001
Tsumura et al17 (2022) 428 RP (n = 214) vs. LDR ± EBRT (n = 214) 0.2 ng/mL 96 mo 8-yr BCR-free rate
LDR vs. RP
Int: 76% vs. 74%
P = 0.642
302 RP without PSM (n = 151) vs. LDR ± EBRT (n = 151) 0.2 ng/mL 96 mo 8-yr BCR-free rate
LDR vs. RP
Int: 76% vs. 83%
P = 0.136

BCR, biochemical recurrence; bPFS, biochemical progression-free survival; DE, dose escalated; DFS, disease-free survival; EBRT, external beam radiation therapy; High, high-risk; IMRT, intensity modulated radiation therapy; Int., intermediate-risk; LDR, low-dose-rate brachytherapy; Low, low-risk; PSM, positive surgical margin; RP, radical prostatectomy.