Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 8;14:1181544. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1181544

Table 6.

Association between telomere length and fat.

Location Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
β 95%CI β 95%CI β 95%CI β 95%CI
Head -0.092 -61.746–45.926 -0.017 -14.779–5.166 -0.024 -19.095–9.511 -0.025 -19.347–9.708
Left arm -0.133 -357.160–291.638 -0.010 -38.062–9.590 -0.010 -39.726–11.123 -0.007 -31.221–2.553
Left leg -0.059 -493.616–310.274 0.004 -25.164-77.932 -0.001 -55.694-47.526 0.000 -54.858-48.922
Right arm -0.136 -372.986–306.068 -0.009 -36.067–7.781 -0.010 -39.815–11.410 -0.006 -29.813–1.400
Right leg -0.054 -467.476–278.886 0.011 22.677-128.228 0.007 -7.259-98.479 0.007 -7.495-98.736
Trunk -0.186 -4077.427–3532.308 -0.027 -659.089–444.081 -0.030 -724.563–509.453 -0.028 -683.378–467.466
Subtotal -0.143 -5736.232–4751.608 -0.013 -678.541-312.454 -0.017 -809.410–443.625 -0.015 -749.044–381.482
Total -0.143 -5792.809–4802.702 -0.014 -689.094–321.847 -0.017 -824.235–457.407 -0.016 -764.099–395.483

TL, telomere length.

Model 1: Unadjusted model.

Model 2: age, gender, race, and BMI were adjusted.

Model 3: age, gender, race, BMI, education and smoking were adjusted.

Model 4: age, gender, race, BMI, education, smoking, osteoporosis, DM history, pain drugs intake history, and physical activity level were adjusted.