Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 11;46(10):1831–1838. doi: 10.2337/dc23-0635

Table 2.

Baseline and follow-up HbA1c, CGM-derived glucose metrics (uncorrected changes), and patient-reported outcome measure scores

n § Baseline Follow-up Change (95% CI) P *
HbA1c
 mmol/mol 436 78.9 ± 9.1 62.1 ± 9.1 −16.7 (−15.8, −17.6) <0.001
 % 436 9.4 ± 0.8 7.8 ± 0.8 −1.5 (−1.4, −1.6) <0.001
Glucose data
 TAR, level 2 (>250 mg/dL), % 407 37.2 ± 19.1 14.9 ± 11.8 −22.4 (−20.5, −24.2) <0.001
 TAR, level 1 (181–250 mg/dL),# % 381 26.8 ± 10.3 22.3 ± 11.7 −4.5 (−3.0, −6.1) <0.001
 TIR (70–180 mg/dL),# % 417 34.2 ± 14.5 61.9 ± 13.1 27.8 (26.2, 29.4) <0.001
 TBR (54–69 mg/dL),# % 411 1.8 ± 2.4 1.3 ± 1.6 −0.5 (0.2, 0.8) <0.001
 TBR (<54 mg/dL),# % 397 0.37 ± 1.00 0.35 ± 0.57 −0.03 (−0.13, 0.18) 0.729
 Coefficient of variation# 325 38.0 ± 6.9 35.2 ± 6.7 −2.8 (−1.9, −3.6) <0.001
Patient-reported outcome measures
 Gold score 415 2.3 ± 1.4 1.9 ± 1.2 −0.4 (−0.2, −0.5) <0.001
 Diabetes distress score 412 3.3 ± 1.3 2.2 ± 1.0 −1.1 (−1.0, −1.3) <0.001
 Diabetes distress score (average ≥3), % (n) 412 69.2 (285) 22.8 (94) −46.4 (−191) <0.001
 Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (Gold score ≥4), % (n) 415 16.9 (70) 9.4 (39) −7.5 (−31) <0.001

Data are mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. TAR, time above range.

*

Statistical significance calculated using unpaired t tests for all covariates included in this table, following assessment for skew.

Statistical significance calculated using Chi-squared tests.

§

Number with available paired data at baseline and follow-up included in analysis for a given outcome; total cohort = 520.

#

Data derived from isCGM at baseline and real-time CGM at follow-up.