Table 1.
Parameter | True value(s) | Description |
---|---|---|
Equation 1a (Logistic sub-model) | ||
2.94, 2.20, 1.10 | Non-varying intercept corresponding with probability of any drinking in the control condition. The three values correspond with a 5%, 10%, and 25% rate of zeroes, respectively | |
0.14 | Non-varying slope for treatment | |
3.16 | Covariate effect of baseline drinking (not drinking vs. any drinking) | |
−0.91 | Covariate effect of baseline drinking (quantity of drinking) | |
1.06 | SD of study-level varying intercept | |
0.16 | SD of study-level varying slope for treatment | |
1.60 | SD of participant-level varying intercept | |
0.09 | Correlation of the varying intercept and varying treatment slope | |
Equation 1b (Zero-truncated negative binomial sub-model) | ||
0.72 | Non-varying intercept corresponding with mean number of drinks when drinking in the control condition. | |
−0.01 | Non-varying slope for treatment | |
0.16 | Covariate effect of baseline drinking (not drinking vs. any drinking) | |
0.38 | Covariate effect of baseline drinking (quantity of drinking) | |
0.14 | SD of study-level varying intercept | |
0.05 | SD of study-level varying slope for treatment | |
0.24 | SD of participant-level varying intercept | |
−0.19 | Correlation of the varying intercept and varying treatment slope | |
330.00 | Dispersion parameter |
Notes. Correlations between the two hurdle sub-models were not modeled in the data generation, to minimize non-convergence in the simulation analyses. (B) = Logistic sub-model parameter; (C) = Zero-truncated negative binomial sub-model parameter; SD = standard deviation.