Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2023 Mar 23;38(6):E424–E436. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000869

Table 3:

Module Ratings and Preferred Method of Delivery of Modules

Ratings of Modules in Word and Website Format
Mean ratings of all modules Standard Deviation Range
Ratings of the Word Document Modules
Relevant 4.89 0.31 4–5
Clear 4.56 0.50 4–5
Accurate 4.89 0.31 4–5
Useful 5 0 5
Ratings of the Website
Acceptability 4.80 0.36 4–5
Appropriateness 4.87 0.35 4–5
Feasibility 4.82 0.36 4–5
Preferred method of delivery of the intervention
Method of Delivery Average Rating Standard Deviation Range
Smart-device based mobile app 8.75 1.29 6–10
Website 8.50 1.68 5–10
Hard Copies, In-person 7.78 2.99 1–10
PDF, iBook, or other digital format 6.13 2.59 5–10
Hard Copies, by Regular Mail 3.63 2.43 1–7
USB Flash Drive by Regular Mail 2.88 2.07 1–9
Methods to communicate results and feedback of the modules back to program staff
Telephone calls 7 2.12 3–10
Facetime, skype, or other video conferencing 7 1.41 4–8
Smart device based mobile app 7 2.12 3–8
Email exchanges 6.75 1.85 7–9
In person meetings in a clinic 6.56 2.75 1–10
In person meetings in a clinic 6.56 2.75 1–10
Text messages 6 1.66 4–8
Website, blog, or web chat 6 1.87 3–8
In person meetings at home 5.67 3.13 1–10
Facebook or other social media 4.50 2.29 1–6

Ratings of the word document files and ratings of the website consisted of Likert scales where 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Ratings of the preferred method of delivery and preferred methods to communicate results and feedback back to program staff consisted of Likert scales where 1=least desirable to 10=most desirable.