Table 4.
Results of Characterizing Global Nodes in Relation to Callous-Unemotional Traits
| Coef. | Std.Coef | Std.Err. | z | p | Bootstrapped, 95% CI |
Whole sample probability global hub |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Probability | >Chance | ||||||
| IFG oper L | 6.286* | 0.178 | 2.275 | 2.763 | 0.006 | 1.827 | 10.746 | 0.047 | False |
| PostCG L | 1.617 | 0.139 | 1.104 | 1.464 | 0.143 | −0.547 | 3.78 | 0.001 | False |
| ICC L | 0.428 | −0.105 | 0.828 | 0.516 | 0.606 | −1.195 | 2.051 | 0.001 | False |
| SMA L | −0.005 | −0.078 | 0.987 | −0.005 | 0.996 | −1.94 | 1.93 | 0.001 | False |
| AC | 1.179 | 0.017 | 0.887 | 1.329 | 0.184 | −0.56 | 2.918 | 0.500 | True |
| aTFusC L | 1.237 | 0.015 | 1.056 | 1.171 | 0.242 | −0.833 | 3.307 | 0.001 | False |
| FO L | −0.215 | −0.045 | 1.018 | −0.211 | 0.833 | −2.211 | 1.781 | 0.523 | True |
| PO L | 0.517 | −0.064 | 0.989 | 0.523 | 0.601 | −1.421 | 2.455 | 0.442 | False |
| Amygdala L | 1.564 | −0.017 | 1.014 | 1.542 | 0.123 | −0.424 | 3.552 | 0.547 | True |
| Ver9 | 1.467 | −0.002 | 0.951 | 1.542 | 0.123 | −0.397 | 3.331 | 0.001 | False |
| Salience.Ainsula R | 0.280 | 0.136 | 1.152 | 0.243 | 0.808 | −1.978 | 2.538 | 0.349 | False |
| Salience.SMG L | 0.543 | −0.183 | 0.875 | 0.621 | 0.535 | −1.172 | 2.259 | 0.001 | False |
| Language.IFG R | −0.272 | −0.159 | 0.918 | −0.297 | 0.767 | −2.071 | 1.527 | 0.512 | True |
| Individual Var | 8.925 | ||||||||
Nine nodes were excluded due to zero participants with a global hub for that node.
The whole sample probability test compares the whole sample probability of being a global node and compares this with a random sample. True indicates that the sample probability is better than chance, whereas False indicates that the sample probability is not better than chance.
See Table 1 for abbreviations for brain regions.
*
p < 0.05.
CI, confidence interval.