Table 2.

Sensitivity, Specificity, Area Under the Curve in Comparison With ETDRS Using a Cut-Off of ≤0.1 versus >0.1

Same Cut-Off as ETDRS (≤0.1 vs ≥ 0.11)				Optimal Cut-Off
Test	Sensitivity	Specificity	Area Under the ROC	Optimal Cut-Off	Sensitivity	Specificity	Area Under the ROC
WatDAT 3 HC	1.00	0.82	0.91	0.2	0.98	0.94	0.96
WatDAT 5 HC	1.00	0.79	0.90	0.3	0.98	0.94	0.96
WatDAT 3 Faces	0.96	0.97	0.96	0.1
WatDAT 5 Faces	1.00	0.97	0.99	0.1
Patti Pics MassVAT	0.98	0.94	0.96	0.1
Patti Pics UC	0.96	0.94	0.95	0.1
Lea MassVAT	0.98	0.97	0.97	0.0	1.00	0.97	0.99
Lea UC	0.85	1.00	0.92	0.0	0.96	0.94	0.95
Kay Pictures	0.72	1.00	0.86	−0.1	1.00	0.91	0.96
CAT	0.46	1.00	0.73	−0.5	0.93	0.74	0.84
TAC	0.65	1.00	0.80	−0.1	0.89	0.85	0.87

The optimal cut-off using ROC analysis is also shown for those tests for which it changed.

UC, uncrowded.