Table 1.
All studies | Number of studies (n = 57) |
Country economies | |
Low-income and lower-middle-income | 1 (1.8%) |
Upper-middle-income | 1 (1.8%) |
High-income | 55 (96.4%) |
Study quality | |
Low | 8 (14.0%) |
Medium | 19 (33.3%) |
High | 30 (52.6%) |
Key and vulnerable populations controlled for or studied * | |
Rural | 15 (26.3%) |
Lower-income | 9 (15.8%) |
Marginalised racial or ethnic groups | 9 (15.8%) |
Component examined * | |
Early intervention | 6 (10.5%) |
Education | 11 (19.3%) |
Innovative approaches (roles) | 12 (21.1%) |
Innovative approaches (services) | 9 (15.8%) |
Standardised sessions | 6 (10.5%) |
Telehealth | 7 (12.3%) |
Volunteers | 9 (15.8%) |
Quantitative studies | Number of studies (n = 36) |
Outcome measures * | |
Advance care planning | 3 (8.3%) |
Costs | 3 (8.3%) |
Death location | 7 (19.4%) |
Hospice utilisation | 5 (13.9%) |
Hospital utilisation | 12 (33.3%) |
Knowledge | 14 (39.0%) |
Quality of life | 6 (16.7%) |
Symptoms | 8 (22.2%) |
Qualitative studies | Number of studies (n = 32) |
Participants * | |
Caregivers and family members | 13 (40.6%) |
Healthcare providers | 21 (66.0%) |
Patients | 9 (28.1%) |
Volunteers | 5 (15.6%) |
Note: Percentages might not add to 100% due to rounding; mixed-methods studies included in both qualitative and quantitative categories.
aSome studies include multiple categories, resulting in percentages not adding to 100%.