Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 16;52(9):afad175. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad175

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies

All studies Number of studies (n = 57)
Country economies
Low-income and lower-middle-income 1 (1.8%)
Upper-middle-income 1 (1.8%)
High-income 55 (96.4%)
Study quality
Low 8 (14.0%)
Medium 19 (33.3%)
High 30 (52.6%)
Key and vulnerable populations controlled for or studied *
Rural 15 (26.3%)
Lower-income 9 (15.8%)
Marginalised racial or ethnic groups 9 (15.8%)
Component examined *
Early intervention 6 (10.5%)
Education 11 (19.3%)
Innovative approaches (roles) 12 (21.1%)
Innovative approaches (services) 9 (15.8%)
Standardised sessions 6 (10.5%)
Telehealth 7 (12.3%)
Volunteers 9 (15.8%)
Quantitative studies Number of studies (n = 36)
Outcome measures *
Advance care planning 3 (8.3%)
Costs 3 (8.3%)
Death location 7 (19.4%)
Hospice utilisation 5 (13.9%)
Hospital utilisation 12 (33.3%)
Knowledge 14 (39.0%)
Quality of life 6 (16.7%)
Symptoms 8 (22.2%)
Qualitative studies Number of studies (n = 32)
Participants *
Caregivers and family members 13 (40.6%)
Healthcare providers 21 (66.0%)
Patients 9 (28.1%)
Volunteers 5 (15.6%)

Note: Percentages might not add to 100% due to rounding; mixed-methods studies included in both qualitative and quantitative categories.

aSome studies include multiple categories, resulting in percentages not adding to 100%.