Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 16;52(9):afad175. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad175

Table 3.

Qualitative study result summary

Caregivers and family members Healthcare providers Patients Volunteers
Early intervention
Akyar (2019) [21] Y Y
Education
Gardner* (2022) [30] M
Hall (1998) [29] M
Harrison* (2016) [27] Y
Ingleton (2011) [32] Y Y
Naicker (2016) [31] Y
Pesut* (2015) [26] M M M
Innovative approaches (service)
Bracken (2011) [58] [palliative care needs assessment tool] N
Carey (2016) [53] [respite service] M M M
Cortis (2017) [57] [medication management service] Y
Horseman (2019) [59] [caregiver needs assessment tool] M
Lindenfelser (2008) [55] [paediatric music therapy] Y
Spelten (2019) [56] [after-hours nurse service] Y M
Innovative approaches (personnel role)
Daley* (2006) [66] [heart failure nurse-led collaboration] Y
Fedel* (2021) [67] [nurse specialist collaboration role with palliative care] Y
O’Connor (2011) [69] [pharmacists’ role in community-based palliative care] M
Percival (2014) [71] [domiciliary care workers’ role in palliative care team] Y Y Y
Standardised sessions
Fletcher* (2008) [83] Y
Kramer (2014) [43] M
Telehealth
Collier (2016) [84] Y
Hughes (2011) [35] M
Jiang* (2020) [36] Y Y
Saysell* (2003) [37] M
Volunteers
Allen (2016) [44] M
Claxton-Oldfield (2010) [50] Y
Lee* (2020) [45] Y
Luijkx* (2009) [46] Y
Pesut* (2018) [47] Y Y Y
Pesut (2020) [51] Y M Y Y
Subramanian (2022) [48] M M
Warner (2021) [52] M
Weeks (2008) [49] Y

Y = overall positive feedback, M = mixed positive and negative feedback, N = overall negative feedback.

aStudies are both quantitative and qualitative.