Table 1.
Species, experiment, modality | Nodes | Tested phenomena, sampling rate | Datasets (nodes × time points) |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Macaque monkey, anesthesia, electrocorticography48 | grid electrode channels distributed over a cortical hemisphere | critical dynamics, 1,000 Hz. We followed previous work29 that established this sampling rate as a lower bound for detection of critical dynamics in empirical data | 128× (1.5 million) 128× (1.5 million) 128× (1.5 million) 128× (1.5 million) |
Macaque monkey, resting state, electrocorticography48 | scale-free phenomena, 1,000 Hz. | 128× (1 million) 128× (1 million) 128× (1 million) 128× (1 million) |
|
Humans, working memory task, intracranial EEG (electrocorticography and/or stereotactic EEG)49 | grid and/or depth electrode channels distributed over parts of frontal and temporal cortex | We adopted this sampling rate for consistency with tests of dynamical phenomena. Our results were robust to tests at a lower sampling rate of 250 Hz | 84 × (1 million) 110× (764,000) 106× (840,000) 126× (812,000) |
Humans, resting state, stereotactic EEG50 | depth electrode channels distributed over diverse cortical regions | 148× (1 million) 157× (1 million) 166× (1 million) 186× (1 million) |
|
Zebrafish, fictive swimming, light-sheet calcium imaging51 | neurons distributed over the whole brain | some scale-free phenomena, ~3 Hz. We followed previous work34 to adopt a modified avalanche-detection procedure most suitable for analysis of brain-wide light-sheet calcium imaging data | (110,000)× 7,100 (117,000)× 5,200 |