Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 22;52(9):afad182. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad182

Table 2.

Performance evaluation of the best fusion model at different time intervals on test set

Time interval Sample Accuracy (Inline graphic) Precision (Inline graphic) Recall (Inline graphic) F1-score (Inline graphic) AUC (Inline graphic)
0–6 month 130 0.93 ± 0.05 0.59 ± 0.04 0.89 ± 0.08 0.71 ± 0.10 0.98 ± 0.01
6–12 month 135 0.92 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.08 0.89 ± 0.06 0.74 ± 0.17 0.94 ± 0.03
12–18 month 122 0.92 ± 0.11 0.31 ± 0.23 0.80 ± 0.04 0.44 ± 0.22 0.89 ± 0.09
18–24 month 140 0.86 ± 0.20 0.57 ± 0.12 0.52 ± 0.24 0.55 ± 0.12 0.84 ± 0.10
24–36 month 130 0.88 ± 0.01 0.44 ± 0.17 0.54 ± 0.27 0.48 ± 0.37 0.80 ± 0.15

Note: The best fusion model refers to AdaBoost (base estimator: logistic regression).

AUC, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

The global model was assessed by grouping the outcomes of the test data at different time intervals (0–6, 6–12, 12–18, 18–24 and 24–36 months). There are 13, 18, 5, 23, and 13 patients with MCI progression in 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, 18-24, and 24-36 months, respectively.