Table 2. Summary of the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional studies.
Selection | Kok-Yong Chin et al. [9] | Chi Chen et al. [24] | Sim MY et al. [25] | Rafiq R et al. [26] | LM Wentz et al. [27] | Ningjian Wang et al. [35] | Anna Książek et al. [36] |
Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear |
Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Were confounding factors identified? | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Yes | Unclear |
Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | Unclear | Unclear |
Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Total | 7/8 | 6/8 | 6/8 | 7/8 | 6/8 | 5/8 | 4/8 |
Quality % | 88% | 75% | 75% | 88% | 75% | 63% | 50% |