Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 24;15(9):e45856. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45856

Table 2. Summary of the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional studies.

Quality check was done as per the JBI Critical Appraisal Scale (Yes, No, Unclear, N/A).

JBI, Joanna Briggs Institute.

Selection Kok-Yong Chin et al. [9] Chi Chen et al. [24] Sim MY et al. [25] Rafiq R et al. [26] LM Wentz et al. [27] Ningjian Wang et al. [35] Anna Książek et al. [36]
Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Unclear
Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Were confounding factors identified? Yes Unclear Unclear Yes No Yes Unclear
Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear No Unclear Unclear
Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Total 7/8 6/8 6/8 7/8 6/8 5/8 4/8
Quality % 88% 75% 75% 88% 75% 63% 50%