Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 28;4(9):1326–1344. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00614-y

Extended Data Fig. 2. Characterization of cells derived from the KPC autochthonous model.

Extended Data Fig. 2

a. Immunofluorescence staining of KPC CCs and KPC CAFs for the pancreatic epithelial cell marker CDH1 (green), DAPI (blue) and for the CAF marker α-SMA (yellow), DAPI (blue). Representative images from n = 3 biological independent samples. Scale bar = 30 μm. b. RNAseq reads for CAF and epithelial cell makers in KPC CAFs n = 3 biological independent samples. Data presented as mean values +/− SD c. qRT-PCR of select pancreatic epithelial cell markers and CAF markers in KPC CCs and KPC CAFs, n = 3 biological repeats with 3 technical replicates per biological repeat. p value determined by unpaired, parametric t-test. Data is presented as mean values ± SEM. (ND = not detected) d. qRT-PCR for lysyl oxidase family members in KPC CAFs and KPC CCs treated with 50 nM gemcitabine or vehicle control for 48 hours, n = 3 biological repeats with 3 technical replicates per biological repeat. Data presented as mean values +/− SD. Relative fold expression of LOX family members from gemcitabine treated samples compared to control were determined by 2–∆∆Ct approach. p-values were determined by unpaired, nonparametric t-test with a Mann–Whitney U correction (comparison between two groups).

Source data