Skip to main content
PLOS Computational Biology logoLink to PLOS Computational Biology
. 2023 Sep 8;19(9):e1011452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011452

Computational modeling of multiscale collateral blood supply in a whole-brain-scale arterial network

Tomohiro Otani 1,*, Nozomi Nishimura 1, Hiroshi Yamashita 2, Satoshi Ii 3, Shigeki Yamada 4,5, Yoshiyuki Watanabe 6, Marie Oshima 5, Shigeo Wada 1
Editor: Andrew D McCulloch7
PMCID: PMC10519592  PMID: 37683012

Abstract

The cerebral arterial network covering the brain cortex has multiscale anastomosis structures with sparse intermediate anastomoses (O[102] μm in diameter) and dense pial networks (O[101] μm in diameter). Recent studies indicate that collateral blood supply by cerebral arterial anastomoses has an essential role in the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. However, the physiological importance of these multiscale morphological properties—and especially of intermediate anastomoses—is poorly understood because of innate structural complexities. In this study, a computational model of multiscale anastomoses in whole-brain-scale cerebral arterial networks was developed and used to evaluate collateral blood supply by anastomoses during middle cerebral artery occlusion. Morphologically validated cerebral arterial networks were constructed by combining medical imaging data and mathematical modeling. Sparse intermediate anastomoses were assigned between adjacent main arterial branches; the pial arterial network was modeled as a dense network structure. Blood flow distributions in the arterial network during middle cerebral artery occlusion simulations were computed. Collateral blood supply by intermediate anastomoses increased sharply with increasing numbers of anastomoses and provided one-order-higher flow recoveries to the occluded region (15%–30%) compared with simulations using a pial network only, even with a small number of intermediate anastomoses (≤10). These findings demonstrate the importance of sparse intermediate anastomoses, which are generally considered redundant structures in cerebral infarction, and provide insights into the physiological significance of the multiscale properties of arterial anastomoses.

Author summary

The collateral blood supply in the cerebral arterial network that covers the brain cortex has an essential role in the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. However, these physiological functions remain poorly understood because of the structural complexities of cerebral arterial anastomoses (the source of collateral blood supply), which have multiscale properties (diameters 50–400 μm). Thus, we aimed to estimate the potential function of multiscale anastomoses in collateral blood supply during acute ischemic stroke using computational modeling. A sparse intermediate scale of anastomoses (O[102] μm in diameter) and a dense pial arterial network (O[101] μm in diameter) were constructed in the morphologically validated arterial network model (whole-brain scale); blood flow distributions in this arterial network were then computed using numerous patterns of intermediate anastomoses in the MCA occlusion. Obtained results successfully demonstrate that sparse numbers of intermediate anastomoses primarily provide collateral blood supply toward upstream and downstream regions and provide one-order-higher flow recoveries to the occlusion region compared with simulations with a pial network only. We hope that our findings stimulate further clinical and anatomical measurements of multiscale cerebral anastomoses.

Introduction

The cerebrovascular system is the only source of blood supply to the brain, which has a high metabolic rate and uses 25% of the body’s total oxygen consumption from blood flow [1]. To ensure a sustainable blood supply, the cerebrovascular system has a network structure with redundant connections (anastomoses) not only in the vascular bed in the cerebral cortex, but also on cortical surfaces, for robustness against cerebral infarctions. Although there have been numerous studies of cerebrovascular anastomoses over more than a century, their morphologies and functions remain under debate as summarized in [2,3]. Recent medical imaging studies indicate that collateral blood supply by cerebral arterial anastomoses has an essential role in the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion [46]; their clinical importance is now widely recognized [79]. Nevertheless, relationships between the morphological properties of anastomoses and the extent of collateral blood supply remain poorly understood because of limits to both knowledge and measurements.

Cerebral arterial anastomoses have multiscale properties and can be classified by size into three tiers [10]. Tier 1 refers to the anterior and posterior communicating arteries that constitute the circle of Willis, located at the base of the brain. Each anastomose connects the left–right anterior cerebral arteries (ACAs) and the middle cerebral artery (MCA)–posterior cerebral artery (PCA); this is widely accepted to provide system redundancies [11]. Tier 2 refers to the intermediate anastomoses between branches of the three main arteries (ACA, MCA, and PCA). Vander Eecken and Adams [12] examined 10 human cadavers and reported sparse (approximately 10 per whole brain) intermediate anastomoses with a diameter of 200–610 μm between the ACA–MCA and PCA–MCA branches. Subsequent preclinical research has reported that the number of these anastomoses is influenced by genetic factors [1315]. Tier 3 refers to the local loops formed by pial anastomoses within the same branch. In the first quantitative measurements using 25 human cadavers, Duvernoy et al. [16] reported numerous anastomoses with a diameter of 25–90 μm in pial arterioles on the cerebral cortex. More recently, Blinder et al. [10] conducted a comprehensive study of the network topology of rodent pial arterioles and revealed the characteristic topology of the arterial network, such as redundancies (network topology is ideally a hexahedral structure) and hierarchical properties (the number of closed loops exponentially decreases with increasing loop area). These hierarchical structures have also been reported in a human cadaver study; the number of anastomoses decreases sharply with increasing anastomoses diameters (ranging from 20–2,000 μm) [17]. Functionally, Blinder et al. [10] suggested that ischemic outcomes following MCA occlusion [18,19] are influenced by intermediate anastomoses (Tier 2), whereas the local rerouting of blood to preserve flow in the face of both local obstructions and a global decrease in perfusion [20] are provided by local loops on the pial arterial network (Tier 3). However, these complementary functions of multiscale anastomoses have received little attention in clinical studies; Tier 2 and 3 anastomoses are thus typically equated as secondary collateral pathways [7].

To clarify the extent of collateral blood supply by multiscale anastomoses, especially in cerebral infarction, computational simulation based on morphologically validated arterial structures on a whole-brain scale is considered a reasonable approach. There are several computational models that represent a whole-brain-scale arterial structure [2123] by mathematical optimal design based on Murray’s minimum energy principle [24]. However, these models assume arterial structures as binary trees without a closed loop, except for the circle of Willis. To the authors’ knowledge, a computational model of arterial structures with anastomoses has been proposed by only one research group [25,26]. This group simplified the anastomose structures as a one-layered pial arterial network (Tier 3) consisting of an idealized hexahedral network structure with a diameter of 400 μm (one order higher than those of known pial arterioles [16]); this simplification may overestimate the effects of pial anastomoses on collateral supply. Thus, computational arterial models that consider multiscale arterial anastomoses remain lacking, and little is known about the potential functions of arterial anastomoses for collateral blood supply in cerebral infarction, which is of major clinical interest.

In the present study, we aimed to develop a computational model of multiscale arterial anastomoses in a whole-brain-scale cerebral arterial network, and to then investigate the potential function of anastomoses as resultant collateral blood supply. We hypothesized that intermediate anastomoses (Tier 2) primarily provide collateral blood supply in response to cerebral infarction. To obtain insights into this hypothesis, we developed a multiscale arterial anastomosis model in the whole-brain-scale arterial network developed in our previous study [21] and performed a blood flow analysis in the arterial network to consider both normal and MCA occlusion states.

Methods

Whole-brain-scale arterial network model

A cerebral arterial network covering a whole brain cortex was constructed using the method from our previous study [21]; it combined the image-based geometry of the human brain cortex and large cerebral arteries and a mathematical vascular generation algorithm. Here, we briefly summarize the computational framework of the arterial network construction for completeness. Note that all elements needed to construct the arterial network model [21] are publicly available (https://zenodo.org/record/3707179#.Y1YLjnbP1D8).

A cerebral arterial network from the circle of Willis to the pial arterioles was constructed using a hybrid modeling approach that determined these networks by combining large arteries extracted from medical images and a mathematical vascular generation algorithm (multilevel region-confined algorithm) (Fig 1). Here, the arterial structure was represented as a network with sets of nodes V={|vm|m=1,2,,|V|} and edges E={en|n=1,2,,|E|}. In preparation, the brain cortex and large arteries were segmented from medical images (Fig 1(A)) and discretized as closed triangle surfaces, and the network formed arterial centerlines. In the multilevel region-confined algorithm, the vascular network was constructed as a binary tree structure in two steps to express its hierarchical structure. In the first step, a coarse arterial network was constructed from each end node of the large vessels (Fig 1(B)). Each terminal node of the coarse arteries is assigned at each subregion Ωic(i=1,,N1) of the brain cortical surface, where N1 is the number of coarse arterial subregions. The tree structure was developed based on the minimum energy principle using the constrained constructive optimization algorithm [27] with reasonable simplifications. Here, the total flow rate Q was equally distributed on the brain cortex, and the flow rate qi at the arterial terminal i was determined by qic=Q|Ωic||Ω|, where |Ωic| and |Ω| were the area of the region Ωic and the whole cerebral cortex, respectively. The fine arterial network was constructed from terminals of coarse arteries in Ωic independently (Fig 1 (C)). The region Ωic was further divided into N2 sub-regions Ωif and one terminal node of the coarse arterial structure was assigned at each Ωif. Here, the arterial edge was divided by 11 nodes to project the arterial edges onto the brain cortical surface. Note that the flow rate qic was only used in the process of the coarse arterial network modeling process and was not applied in the subsequent blood flow simulation.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Multiscale arterial structure generated using the method from [21]: large arteries and brain surface data were extracted from medical images (a), coarse arteries covered the whole cerebral cortex (N1 = 2000) (b), and fine arteries were distributed in local regions (N2 = 37) (c).

Modeling of arterial anastomoses

Fig 2(A) summarizes the three tiers of cerebral arterial anastomoses. Because the circle of Willis (Tier 1) is involved in a subject-specific arterial network extracted from medical images (Fig 1(A)), we modeled intermediate anastomoses (Tier 2) connecting central arterial trees with diameters of O(102) μm and pial anastomoses (Tier 3) covering brain cortical surfaces with diameters of O(101) μm, as follows.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Multiscale anastomoses construction. (a) Schematic of multiscale cerebral arterial anastomoses: the main cerebral arteries (anterior cerebral artery [ACA], middle cerebral artery [MCA], and posterior cerebral artery [PCA]) constitute anastomoses (circle of Willis) on the base of the brain (Tier 1); branching patterns of the main cerebral arteries had binary tree structures while intermediate anastomoses were generated between adjacent cerebral arterial trees with an order of 102 μm in diameter (Tier 2); and the number of anastomoses exponentially increased with increasing branches, and a dense pial arterial network structure with an order of 101 μm in diameter was constructed (Tier 3). (b) Computational modeling of the intermediate anastomoses (Tier 2) was set on terminals of adjacent arterial branches (white lines). (c) The pial arterial network (Tier 3) was modeled as hexahedral loop structures, as in [25].

In the construction of the intermediate anastomoses, boundaries between territories of the RMCA and adjacent main cerebral artery (RACA and RPCA) were segmented by coarse arterial terminals, and all terminal pairs of nearest neighbors between these territories (total number of N) were then selected as potential candidates to assign the intermediate anastomoses (Fig 2(B)). Because of the sparse properties of intermediate anastomoses [12], we adopted n numbers of pairs from N numbers of potential candidates to assign intermediate anastomoses. Diameters of the anastomoses were set to an average of connecting arteries.

In the pial arterial network construction, the network structures were modeled as ideal hexahedral loops by the idea of [25]. The hexahedral loops were constructed as the dual graph of surface triangle edges (Fig 2(C)) where the number of nodes was 1,124,504, which was set based on the surface densities of penetrating arteries (8.7 numbers/mm2) [28]. The diameter of the pial arterial network was set to 40 μm based on the known diameters of pial arterial networks and penetrating arteries [16]. Terminals of the fine arterial structure were connected to the nearest nodes of the pial arterial networks. For the subsequent blood flow simulation, we set penetrating arteries with a diameter of 40 μm on each node of the pial arterial networks; the length was set from the edge length of each surface triangle element.

Blood flow simulation

Blood flow through the arterial network was modeled as a steady zero-dimensional Newtonian flow with a viscosity μ of 3.5×10−3 Pa·s. Poiseuille flow was assumed in each artery; thus, the flow rate qij in an edge ij with the node i and j was given by

qij=kij(pipj),kij=πdij4128μLij, (1)

where pi and pj are the pressure at the node i and j, dij is the edge diameter, Lij is the edge length, and kij is the constant determined from the Poiseuille flow assumption. To satisfy the mass conservation at the branching point, the mass-balance equation at the node i was given by

jnikij(pipj)=si, (2)

Where ni is the number of nodes connecting to node i, and si is the source term and is set to zero except for the boundaries. The linear algebraic equation about the pressure was constructed by assembling Eq [2] of all nodes in a whole arterial network. Boundary conditions were as follows: constant pressure of 100 mmHg was set at the inlet nodes of the right and left internal carotid arteries, and right and left vertebral arteries, and a terminal resistance model was assigned at the terminals of pial arteries. As the terminal resistance model, the outlet pressure pi at node i was given by

pi=p0+Rqi, (3)

where R was the terminal resistance and p0 was the terminal pressure in the vascular bed, respectively. To set R, we assumed that the pressure drop in the brain cortex pip0 was 65 mmHg [29]; the flow rate qi at each terminal was given by the areal ratio of the total flow rate of 715 mL/min [30]. Finally, the resultant linear algebraic equation was solved by the algebraic multigrid-preconditioned generalized minimal residual method implemented in the open-source library HYPRE (www.llnl.gov/casc/hypre/).

Calculation conditions

MCA occlusion and extent of flow recoveries

Using the aforementioned computational model, we evaluated the effects of intermediate anastomoses on blood flow distribution under two conditions: normal and right MCA (RMCA) occlusion. For the RMCA occlusion, the diameter of the RMCA arterial edge at the circle of Willis was decreased 99% to represent near-complete occlusion. To evaluate flow recovery to the occluded region, the flow recovery ratio in the occluded region was defined as

Flowrecoveryratio=qocclusionqnormal, (4)

where qnormal and qocclusion were the flow rates in the normal and occlusion conditions, respectively.

Effects of hierarchical structure (N1 and N2)

In the arterial structure construction, to consider the effects of the relative position of the intermediate anastomoses, we set three patterns of N1 and N2 (the number of coarse and fine arterial subregions): (N1, N2) = (1000, 74), (2000, 37), and (4000, 19). The numbers of resultant arterial edges were approximately 1.5×105 in all cases, and the numbers of candidates of intermediate anastomoses N were 44 at (N1, N2) = (1000, 74), 56 at (N1, N2) = (2000, 37), and 102 at (N1, N2) = (4000, 19). Fig 3 shows a box plot of the terminal edge diameter of each coarse and fine artery. This arterial structure expressed the following multiscale properties: coarse arteries with a diameter of O(102) μm broadly covered the brain, and fine arteries were locally distributed in the brain cortex with diameters of O(101) μm. The coarse arterial diameters gradually decreased with increasing N1, whereas fine arterial diameters remained within the same ranges; this ensured that these three networks had equivalent branch structure (except for the intermediate anastomoses).

Fig 3. Box plot of the terminal edge diameter of each coarse and fine arterial structure of three patterns at the number of coarse and fine arterial subregions (N1 and N2) = (1000, 74), (2000, 37), and (4000, 19).

Fig 3

In all three patterns, diameter of the coarse arteries distributed in whole brain surface was in the range of O(102) μm whereas that of the fine arteries locally distributed in the brain cortex was in the range of O(101) μm.

Effects of numbers of intermediate anastomoses (n)

The effects of the number of intermediate anastomoses on collateral blood supply were evaluated by changing the numbers of intermediate anastomoses. Because there are two ways to assign the anastomosis or not at each terminal pair selected as a potential candidate (Fig 2(B)), the total number of combinations of the assignment of the intermediate anastomoses from N pairs are very large (2N). Therefore, we developed an iterative process to reduce the total number of computations by tracking just the upper limits of the effects of anastomoses, as follows. First, one candidate was selected from all nN candidates, and blood flow distribution was computed in cases of RMCA occlusion in all n cases. The candidate with the maximum total flow recovery ratio in the occlusion was adopted as the anastomosis. The aforementioned three processes iteratively proceeded from n = 1 until n became zero. This procedure was able to markedly reduce the total number of the sets for computation to N(N+1)/2. The total numbers of computations were 990, 1596, and 5253 in the cases with (N1, N2) = (1000, 74), (2000, 37), and (4000, 19), respectively.

Results

Normal conditions

To confirm the consistencies of the developed computational model with existing physiological measurements, blood flow distribution in the main cerebral arterial branch was evaluated under normal conditions. Fig 4 shows the blood flow rates in each arterial territory in three cases of (N1, N2) = (1000, 74), (2000, 37), and (4000, 19), both without intermediate anastomoses and with the maximum number of intermediate anastomoses. Relative flow distributions were the same in all cases, and differences caused by adding intermediate anastomoses were within 1%. Furthermore, the blood flow distribution was similar to existing measurement data [30].

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Total blood flow rates in each main cerebral arterial territory (left anterior cerebral artery [LACA], right anterior cerebral artery [RACA], left middle cerebral artery [LMCA], right middle cerebral artery [RMCA], left posterior cerebral artery [LPCA], and right posterior cerebral artery [RPCA]) in the case of (N1, N2) = (1000, 74) (red boxes), (2000, 37) (blue boxes), and (4000, 19) (green boxes) without intermediate anastomoses (left) and with the maximum number of intermediate anastomoses (right). Gray boxes show the measurement data from [30].

MCA occlusion simulations

The blood flow distributions under RMCA occlusion conditions and the collateral blood supply by pial networks without intermediate anastomoses were evaluated using the flow recovery ratio defined as Eq [4] in each main arterial territory in the case of (N1, N2) = (2000, 37) as a representative case, in which the terminal diameters of the coarse arteries were relatively close to the range of the intermediate anastomoses (210–600 μm [12]). Fig 5(A) shows blood flow distribution in each main cerebral arterial territory. The total flow rate in the RMCA region was markedly reduced by occlusion and remained at approximately 3% with the collateral flow of pial anastomoses. In contrast, other arterial territories retained comparable flow rates; differences from those at normal conditions were within 2%. To observe the effects of pial anastomoses on flow recovery, Fig 5(B) shows the spatial distributions of the flow recovery ratio in the RMCA region. Note that the flow recovery ratio was computed in each subregion to which each terminal of the pial arteries was assigned, unless otherwise noted. Pial anastomoses locally rerouted the blood flow distribution around the boundaries of arterial territories, while the flow recovery ratio sharply decreased from the boundaries and reached less than 10%. The areal fraction of the flow recovery ratio in the RMCA region is shown in Fig 5(C). Flow recovery was less than 5% in the 95% RMCA region.

Fig 5. Blood flow distribution in a case without intermediate anastomoses.

Fig 5

(a) Same as Fig 4, but in normal (black boxes) and RMCA occlusion (white boxes) conditions without intermediate anastomoses. (b) Spatial distributions of the flow recovery ratio in the case of (N1, N2) = (2000, 37) without intermediate anastomoses (anterior view [top] and posterior view [bottom]). (c) Volume fraction of the flow recovery ratio on the RMCA (occlusion) region. The flow recovery ratio was computed in each subregion to which each terminal of the pial arteries was assigned, unless otherwise noted.

Fig 6(A) shows both the spatial distributions of the flow recovery ratio in the RMCA region and the flow rate through covering arteries in which the number of intermediate anastomoses (n) = 1 in the case of (N1, N2) = (2000, 37), which was used as a representative case. The intermediate anastomosis rerouted the blood flow in the RMCA region in both upstream and downstream directions; at most, 40% flow rate was compensated in the downstream branch. When the spatial distributions of the flow recovery ratio with n = 1, 5, and 10 (Fig 6(B)) were considered, the flow recovery ratio was locally higher than 10% at n = 1, whereas a larger region with a flow recovery ratio > 20% occurred at n = 5. There was regional expansion of the high flow recovery ratio with increasing numbers of anastomoses. Fig 6(C) shows the areal fraction of the flow recovery ratio in the RMCA region. Flow recoveries primarily ranged from 5% to 10% in almost all regions (>90%) at n = 1; the flow recovery ratio globally increased with increasing numbers of anastomoses, and was globally higher than 10% in almost all regions (>99%) at n = 5. Furthermore, relatively large variations of flow recovery ratios were noted, and regions in which flow recoveries were higher than 30% reached 2%. These tendencies were also observed in the case of n = 10; the flow recoveries were mainly distributed at more than 15%, with larger variations.

Fig 6. Blood flow distribution in cases with intermediate anastomoses.

Fig 6

(a) Spatial distribution of the flow recovery ratio in the RMCA domain and flow rates in arteries (pial arteries are not visualized for simplicity) with the number of intermediate anastomoses (n) = 1, and spatial distributions of the flow recovery ratio (b) and its areal fraction (c) at n = 1, 5, and 10 in the case of (N1, N2) = (2000, 37).

Fig 7 shows the total flow recovery in the RMCA region in relation to the number of intermediate anastomoses. Here, the results of three cases with different (N1, N2) were plotted to confirm the variation caused by the relative positions of intermediate anastomoses. In all cases, the flow recovery ratio rapidly increased from 0 to 10 anastomoses and reached 15%–30%. It moderately increased with increasing numbers of anastomoses and asymptotically approached 35%–45%. The increasing degree of flow recovery ratio was higher when the anastomoses were set more upstream. Variation caused by the selection of anastomoses from possible candidates was within 4% at n = 1 in all cases, and gradually decreased with increasing numbers of anastomoses.

Fig 7. Total flow recovery ratio in the occluded region (right middle cerebral arterial [RMCA] region) in relation to the number of intermediate anastomoses in the cases of (N1,N2) = (1000, 74), (2000, 37), and (4000, 18).

Fig 7

Line widths show the variations in the selection of anastomoses from possible candidates (noted in the Calculation conditions section).

Discussion

In the present study, we developed a computational model of multiscale anastomoses in cerebral arterial networks and evaluated the collateral blood supply by anastomoses in MCA occlusion. The morphologically validated cerebral arterial network was constructed using the methods from [21]; intermediate anastomoses with diameters of O(102) μm and pial arterial networks with diameters of O(101) μm were represented based on current anatomical understanding. The blood flow simulation under normal conditions successfully demonstrated that the flow rate distributions in each main cerebral artery were in good agreement with clinical measurements [30] (Fig 4). This finding demonstrates the capabilities of the developed computational modeling for expressing physiologically reasonable cerebral blood perfusion. Using the aforementioned computational model, in silico studies with possible patterns of intermediate anastomoses provided the following insights from clinical and computational viewpoints.

From a physical viewpoint (e.g., [2]), higher tiers of arterial anastomoses are expected to have higher capacities of blood supply because of larger pressure drops and lower hydraulic resistances. However, the morphological complexities of cerebral arterial networks have made it difficult to estimate the collateral blood supply capabilities of sparse intermediate anastomoses (Tier 2) on a whole-brain scale, and multi-tiers of anastomoses (except for the circle of Willis) have typically been equated as secondary collateral pathways in clinical studies [7]. The present findings indicate that intermediate anastomoses can function as collateral pathways during main cerebral arterial occlusion, even in small numbers. Although the flow recovery was approximately 3% by pial arterial networks (Tier 3) only (Fig 5), even small numbers (≤10) of intermediate anastomoses provided one-order-higher flow recoveries to sufficiently reroute blood flow (Fig 7), which is consistent with anatomical evidence [12,17]. These findings indicate that sparse intermediate anastomoses are capable of providing robust cerebral blood perfusion in acute infarction.

Furthermore, the current results revealed two characteristics of collateral blood supply by intermediate anastomoses. First, the selection of intermediate anastomoses from possible candidates of similar size had relatively small effects on total flow recoveries in the occluded region (Fig 7). These findings indicate sufficient collateral blood supply in the upstream direction for global flow recoveries, rather than for local flow recoveries in downstream directions. This feature is consistent with clinical observations that the collateral blood supply in cerebral infarction is visible in a wide range of angiographic images with limited resolutions [8]. Second, a moderate localization of high flow recovery area (20%–50%) was identified around anastomoses and increased with increasing numbers of anastomoses (Fig 6). Regions with moderate blood recoveries by collateral blood supply in the occluded region (25%–50% [31]) are commonly understood to be ischemic penumbra [32], where tissue is viable but functionally depressed because of inadequate perfusion [33]. Because these regions are associated with the possible therapeutic benefit of early blood flow restoration [33], the extent of these formations is of much clinical interest [34]. From this clinical perspective, our findings indicate that intermediate anastomoses are capable of forming ischemic penumbra even in small numbers; this may be a key factor for influencing the extent of ischemic penumbra and subsequent prognosis after cerebral infarction.

From a computational viewpoint, the present results under normal conditions provided further model validation and insights. Under normal conditions, the rerouting functions of intermediate anastomoses on blood flow supply to the whole brain cortex were minor, regardless of the relative hierarchies of anastomoses (Fig 4). These relatively low flow rates under normal conditions can be understood as small pressure drops in anastomoses, which is consistent with conventional understanding [12]. This consistency supports the assumption adopted in the arterial model [21] of the uniformity in size of each main arterial branch on the boundaries of each territory, even at a coarse scale of O(102) μm, and gives further physiological validation to the developed computational arterial model.

The findings concerning the relatively small collateral supply in normal conditions suggest difficulties in patient-specific measurements of anastomose morphologies. Although time-of-flight imaging using 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging can now non-invasively detect arterial structures with diameters of >100 μm [35], a relatively low flow rate causes low signal intensity and makes detection challenging compared with other structures of similar diameters. Furthermore, the numbers of intermediate anastomoses are few, and these structures were even not mentioned in a recent cadaver study of cerebral arterial networks with diameters of >100 μm [36]; these features point to difficulties in patient-specific morphological understanding and intermediate anastomose measurements. Further research into the patient-specific detection of arterial anastomoses is thus needed.

This study has fifth main limitations. First, although our model was able to investigate the importance of the multiscale structures of cerebral arterial anastomoses, it was unable to provide quantitative values of patient-specific collateral blood supply because of the limited morphological and physiological data of human cerebral arteries and the complexities of neurobiological processes during occlusion [37]. For example, the geometries of the brain surfaces and the large artery used in this study were extracted from different subjects according to data accessibility [21]. Although this inconsistency does not affect the subsequent modeling of the arterial network because only the terminal nodes of the large arteries were used in this process, this limitation loses information regarding personal specificity, as noted in [21]. Furtheremore, autoregulatory function in response to MCA occlusion was not considered because of its complexities [38]. Given that these physiological responses can be considered to recover blood supply, the present study might thus underestimate the extent of collateral blood supply. Second, the present study considered cerebral arterial anastomoses only; there are many other kinds of anastomoses—such as those between intracranial and extracranial arteries or cerebral and cerebellar arteries [39]—that may also provide blood flow in response to the occlusion of main cerebral arteries. Although the anatomical and physiological knowledge of such anastomoses is very limited compared with that of arterial anastomoses, further computational modeling may uncover their potential importance. Third, both intermediate anastomoses and pial arterial networks were ideally set in terms of scales and diameters. In particular, the pial arterial network was modeled as an idealized hexahedral network using the method from [25]. Although this idealization is effective for expressing the global morphological characteristics shown in [10] with a simple algorithm, it does not reflect the hierarchical loop structures identified in the original study [10]. The branching patterns of large arteries, including cerebral arteries with a diameter of >O(102) μm [36], obey the minimum energy principle [24]; however, this principle does not accurately express the morphological characteristics of microvasculature (O(100)–O(101) μm) in the human cerebral cortex [40]. The pial arterial network on the brain cortex is located between the aforementioned arterial structures as an interface; thus, further consideration of the functional importance of the pial arterial network will extend our conventional understanding of the physiological optimality of multiscale arterial structures. Fourth, the arterial modeling and blood flow simulation has several assumptions. Because the flow profiles in the peripheral arteries are parabolic shape rather than flat as observed in the aorta [41], we assumed the flow profiles in the whole cerebral arteries to be the steady Poiseuille flow. However, flow unsteadiness and associated arterial deformations may occur in large arteries around the circle of Willis, while non-Newtonian properties may not be negligible in the small arteries. Further consideration of the above multiscale flow profiles in a whole cerebral arterial structure would provide a detailed quantitative understanding of the cerebral hemodynamics. Fifth, this study investigated the effects of Tier 2 and Tier 3 anastomoses while the relative effects of Tier 1 anastomoses (Circle of Willis) were not considered because the tier 1 anastomoses play a minor role in the case of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion at the post-Circle of Wills, which is the main target of this study. However, in cases where abnormalities occur at the pre-Circle of Wills, such as carotid artery stenosis, full-scale anastomoses including Tier 1 to 3 may help to ensure sustained blood supply, as noted in our previous study [11]. Further systematic analyses of the effects of multiscale anastomoses in various abnormal conditions would provide a comprehensive understanding of the sustainability of the cerebral blood supply.

In conclusion, we developed a computational model of multiscale arterial anastomoses in a whole-brain-scale cerebral arterial network and used it to investigate the extent of collateral blood supply by anastomoses during simulated MCA occlusion. In the morphologically validated computational model of the cerebral arterial network, sparse intermediate anastomoses between adjacent cerebral arterial branches and pial arterial structures were constructed; next, collateral blood supplies were evaluated using a zero-dimensional blood flow model. Even in small numbers (n ≤ 10), intermediate anastomoses primarily worked to reroute both downstream and upstream blood flow, and the extent of locally high blood recoveries around anastomoses were consistent with previous clinical observations. These findings indicate that a relatively small number of intermediate anastomoses are capable of providing collateral blood supply during cerebral occlusion. We hope that our results stimulate further clinical and anatomical measurements of cerebral arterial anastomoses from all three tiers.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yutaka Amako for technical assistances and discussions. We thank Bronwen Gardner, PhD, from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Data Availability

All data files underlying the findings reported in a submitted manuscript are available from the OSF database link: https://osf.io/fn3jb/?view_only=ab80e6c936df44d5ac8c9aad7fe12cbf.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by MEXT as the “Program for Promoting Researches on the Supercomputer Fugaku” (hp220161 to SW and hp230208 to SI), the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science for Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 19H01175 to SW, 21K18037 to TO, 22H00190 to MO, 23K11830 to TO), and the Multidisciplinary Research Laboratory System for Future Developments, Osaka University Graduate School of Engineering Science (to TO). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy E-Book: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. Vol. 41. Elsevier; 2015. 1606 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brozici M, van der Zwan A, Hillen B. Anatomy and Functionality of Leptomeningeal Anastomoses. Stroke. 2003. Nov 1;34(11):2750–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liebeskind DS. Collateral Circulation. Stroke. 2003. Sep 1;34(9):2279–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lu S-S, Zhang X, Xu X-Q, Cao Y-Z, Zhao LB, Liu Q-H, et al. Comparison of CT angiography collaterals for predicting target perfusion profile and clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Eur Radiol. 2019. Sep;29(9):4922–9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06027-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kauw F, Dankbaar JW, Martin BW, Ding VY, Boothroyd DB, van Ommen F, et al. Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020. Nov/Dec;44(6):984–92. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lyndon D, van den Broek M, Niu B, Yip S, Rohr A, Settecase F. Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio Correlates with CTA Collateral Status in Large-Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021. Aug;42(8):1380–6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ginsberg MD. The cerebral collateral circulation: Relevance to pathophysiology and treatment of stroke. Neuropharmacology. 2018. May 15;134(Pt B):280–92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Raymond SB, Schaefer PW. Imaging Brain Collaterals: Quantification, Scoring, and Potential Significance. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2017. Apr;26(2):67–75. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Malhotra K, Liebeskind DS. Collaterals in ischemic stroke. Brain Hemorrhages. 2020. Mar 1;1(1):6–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Blinder P, Shih AY, Rafie C, Kleinfeld D. Topological basis for the robust distribution of blood to rodent neocortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(28):12670–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007239107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yuhn C, Oshima M, Chen Y, Hayakawa M, Yamada S. Uncertainty quantification in cerebral circulation simulations focusing on the collateral flow: Surrogate model approach with machine learning. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022. Jul;18(7):e1009996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vander Eecken HM, Adams RD. The anatomy and functional significance of the meningeal arterial anastomoses of the human brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1953. Apr;12(2):132–57. doi: 10.1097/00005072-195304000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang H, Prabhakar P, Sealock R, Faber JE. Wide genetic variation in the native pial collateral circulation is a major determinant of variation in severity of stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010. May;30(5):923–34. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Piedade GS, Schirmer CM, Goren O, Zhang H, Aghajanian A, Faber JE, et al. Cerebral Collateral Circulation: A Review in the Context of Ischemic Stroke and Mechanical Thrombectomy. World Neurosurg. 2019. Feb;122:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Defazio RA, Levy S, Morales CL, Levy RV, Dave KR, Lin HW, et al. A protocol for characterizing the impact of collateral flow after distal middle cerebral artery occlusion. Transl Stroke Res. 2011. Mar;2(1):112–27. doi: 10.1007/s12975-010-0044-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Duvernoy HM, Delon S, Vannson JL. Cortical blood vessels of the human brain. Brain Res Bull. 1981. Nov;7(5):519–79. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(81)90007-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kono S, Oka K, Sueishi K. Histopathologic and morphometric studies of leptomeningeal vessels in moyamoya disease. Stroke. 1990. Jul 1;21(7):1044–50. doi: 10.1161/01.str.21.7.1044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maeda K, Hata R, Bader M, Walther T, Hossmann KA. Larger anastomoses in angiotensinogen-knockout mice attenuate early metabolic disturbances after middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999. Oct;19(10):1092–8. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199910000-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shuaib A, Butcher K, Mohammad AA, Saqqur M, Liebeskind DS. Collateral blood vessels in acute ischaemic stroke: a potential therapeutic target. Lancet Neurol. 2011. Oct;10(10):909–21. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70195-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schaffer CB, Friedman B, Nishimura N, Schroeder LF, Tsai PS, Ebner FF, et al. Two-photon imaging of cortical surface microvessels reveals a robust redistribution in blood flow after vascular occlusion. PLoS Biol. 2006. Feb;4(2):e22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ii S, Kitade H, Ishida S, Imai Y, Watanabe Y, Wada S. Multiscale modeling of human cerebrovasculature: A hybrid approach using image-based geometry and a mathematical algorithm. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020. Jun;16(6):e1007943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Keelan J, Chung EML, Hague JP. Development of a globally optimised model of the cerebral arteries. Phys Med Biol. 2019. Jun 21;64(12):125021. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shen J, Faruqi AH, Jiang Y, Maftoon N. Mathematical Reconstruction of Patient-Specific Vascular Networks Based on Clinical Images and Global Optimization. IEEE Access. 2021;9:20648–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Murray CD. The Physiological Principle of Minimum Work: I. The Vascular System and the Cost of Blood Volume. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1926. Mar;12(3):207–14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.12.3.207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Padmos RM, Terreros NA, Józsa TI, Závodszky G, Marquering HA, Majoie CBLM, et al. Modelling the leptomeningeal collateral circulation during acute ischaemic stroke. Med Eng Phys. 2021. May;91:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Padmos RM, Arrarte Terreros N, Józsa TI, Závodszky G, Marquering HA, Majoie CBLM, et al. Modelling collateral flow and thrombus permeability during acute ischaemic stroke. J R Soc Interface. 2022. Oct;19(195):20220649. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Karch R, Neumann F, Neumann M, Schreiner W. A three-dimensional model for arterial tree representation, generated by constrained constructive optimization. Comput Biol Med. 1999. Jan;29(1):19–38. doi: 10.1016/s0010-4825(98)00045-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Risser L, Plouraboué F, Cloetens P, Fonta C. A 3D-investigation shows that angiogenesis in primate cerebral cortex mainly occurs at capillary level. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2009. Apr;27(2):185–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2008.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zagzoule M, Marc-Vergnes JP. A global mathematical model of the cerebral circulation in man. J Biomech. 1986;19(12):1015–22. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(86)90118-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zarrinkoob L, Ambarki K, Wåhlin A, Birgander R, Eklund A, Malm J. Blood flow distribution in cerebral arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015. Mar 31;35(4):648–54. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Heiss W-D. The ischemic penumbra: correlates in imaging and implications for treatment of ischemic stroke. The Johann Jacob Wepfer award 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011. Sep 15;32(4):307–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Astrup J, Siesjö BK, Symon L. Thresholds in cerebral ischemia—the ischemic penumbra. Stroke. 1981. Nov-Dec;12(6):723–5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.12.6.723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ginsberg MD. Expanding the concept of neuroprotection for acute ischemic stroke: The pivotal roles of reperfusion and the collateral circulation. Prog Neurobiol. 2016. Oct 1;145–146:46–77. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Heiss WD. Ischemic penumbra: evidence from functional imaging in man. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000. Sep;20(9):1276–93. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200009000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bollmann S, Mattern H, Bernier M, Robinson SD, Park D, Speck O, et al. Imaging of the pial arterial vasculature of the human brain in vivo using high-resolution 7T time-of-flight angiography. Elife. 2022. Apr 29;11:e71186. doi: 10.7554/eLife.71186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Helthuis JHG, van Doormaal TPC, Hillen B, Bleys RLAW, Harteveld AA, Hendrikse J, et al. Branching Pattern of the Cerebral Arterial Tree. Anat Rec. 2019. Aug;302(8):1434–46. doi: 10.1002/ar.23994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Brouns R, De Deyn PP. The complexity of neurobiological processes in acute ischemic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009. Jul;111(6):483–95. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dohmen C, Bosche B, Graf R, Reithmeier T, Ernestus R-I, Brinker G, et al. Identification and Clinical Impact of Impaired Cerebrovascular Autoregulation in Patients With Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction. Stroke. 2007. Jan 1;38(1):56–61. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000251642.18522.b6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lee RM. Morphology of cerebral arteries. Pharmacol Ther. 1995. Apr;66(1):149–73. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(94)00071-a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cassot F, Lauwers F, Lorthois S, Puwanarajah P, Duvernoy H. Scaling laws for branching vessels of human cerebral cortex. Microcirculation. 2009. May;16(4):331–44, 2 p following 344. doi: 10.1080/10739680802662607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Olufsen MS. Structured tree outflow condition for blood flow in larger systemic arteries. Am J Physiol. 1999. Jan;276(1):H257–68. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.276.1.H257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Comput Biol. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011452.r001

Decision Letter 0

Jason M Haugh, Andrew D McCulloch

29 May 2023

Dear Dr Otani,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Computational modeling of multiscale collateral blood supply in a whole-brain-scale arterial network" for consideration at PLOS Computational Biology.

As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Andrew D. McCulloch, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Computational Biology

Jason Haugh

Section Editor

PLOS Computational Biology

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The review is uploaded as an attachment

Reviewer #2: The authors constructed a computational model of the arterial network in a brain that covers multiple scales from a whole brain to a pial microvessel network. They demonstrated how an anastomosis affected cerebral blood flow in normal and occlusion cases. The main result is that sparse intermediate anastomoses at Tier 2 (branches of ACA, MCA and PCA) play a more important role than Tier 3 (pial anastomoses).

The reviewer thinks that the results are very nice, providing new quantitative understanding of cerebral blood flow with highly sophisticated vessel structures involving multi-level anastomoses. His comments below are rather minor to clarify details of the results.

1. Could the authors theoretically or mechanically explain why Tier 2 anastomoses have a higher impact on collateral blood supply? It is also interesting to compare effects of anastomoses between Tier 2 and Tier 1 (the circle of Willis). These investigations may help quantitatively understand relationships in a cerebral vascular network between the blood flow and vessel diameters and numbers at an anastomose. This may be also related to the flow recovery ratio in Fig. 7; a value at the infinite anastomosis number and a gradient may be related to geometries of vessel network.

2. In L94, should “… (20) is provided …” be corrected to “… (20) are provided …” ?

**********

Have the authors made all data and (if applicable) computational code underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data and code underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data and code should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data or code —e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: None

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example in PLOS Biology see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review for the article.pdf

PLoS Comput Biol. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011452.r003

Decision Letter 1

Jason M Haugh, Andrew D McCulloch

21 Aug 2023

Dear Dr Otani,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Computational modeling of multiscale collateral blood supply in a whole-brain-scale arterial network' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Computational Biology.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Computational Biology. 

Best regards,

Andrew D. McCulloch, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Computational Biology

Jason Haugh

Section Editor

PLOS Computational Biology

***********************************************************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The review is not uploaded as an attachment

Reviewer #2: I am happy with the responses and the changes.

**********

Have the authors made all data and (if applicable) computational code underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data and code underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data and code should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data or code —e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: None

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

PLoS Comput Biol. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011452.r004

Acceptance letter

Jason M Haugh, Andrew D McCulloch

4 Sep 2023

PCOMPBIOL-D-23-00430R1

Computational modeling of multiscale collateral blood supply in a whole-brain-scale arterial network

Dear Dr Otani,

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Computational Biology. Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Computational Biology and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Zsofi Zombor

PLOS Computational Biology | Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom ploscompbiol@plos.org | Phone +44 (0) 1223-442824 | ploscompbiol.org | @PLOSCompBiol

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review for the article.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_letter_v3.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All data files underlying the findings reported in a submitted manuscript are available from the OSF database link: https://osf.io/fn3jb/?view_only=ab80e6c936df44d5ac8c9aad7fe12cbf.


    Articles from PLOS Computational Biology are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES