Skip to main content
. 2023 May 8;52(5):1605–1632. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-09945-4

Table 5.

Performance pre- and post- training at the narrative assessment

Linguistic level T0—Pre training T1—Post training z p* r
Score range
Min–Max
Raw score
M (SD)
Score range
Min–Max
Raw score
M (SD)
Micro
MLU 4.65–10.49 6.20 (1.39) 5.33–12.93 8.12 (2.17) 2.79 .005 .70
Omissions of morphosyntactic information 14.82–56.63 35.43 (13.50) 10.10–39.33 24.39 (7.84) − 2.53 .011 .63
Complete sentences 25.54–68.21 48.24 (12.51) 41.79–74.33 58.85 (8.24) 2.84 .004 .71
Macro
Cohesive errors 5.00–60.89 25.22 (13.55) .00–37.48 16.47 (10.43) − 2.79 .005 .70
Coherence errors .00–41.96 13.57 (10.21) .00–25.22 10.83 (8.24) − .91 .363 .23
LIUs 67.55–91.48 79.37 (7.80) 69.14–87.64 77.96 (5.42) − .67 .50 .17

Statistically significant results are indicated in bold

*p-value threshold was adjusted for multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction (p < .008)

z standardized test statistics; r effect size; MLU Mean length of utterance; LIUs Lexical Information Units