Table 7.

Spearman’s correlation analysis between narrative abilities on post-training performance

	MLU	Omissions of morphosyntactic information	Complete sentences	Cohesive errors	Coherence errors	LIUs
MLU	–
Omissions of morphosyntactic information	r =  − .37 p = .015	–
Complete sentences	r = .47 p = .07	r =  − .56 p = .02	–
Cohesive errors	r =  − .42 p = .11	r = .74 p < .001	r =  − .46 p = .08	–
Coherence errors	r =  − .12 p = .66	r =  − .15 p = .58	r =  − .16 p = .54	r =  − .05 p = .86	–
LIUs	r =  − .12 p = .65	r =  − .12 p = .65	r =  − .14 p = .61	r =  − .35 p = .18	r =  − .50 p = .05	–

Statistically significant result is indicated in bold

*p-value threshold was adjusted for multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction (p < .003)

Degrees of freedom for each correlation = 14

MLU Mean length of utterance; LIUs Lexical Information Units