Table 3.
Investigated states | Recording location | Recording modality | Features | Models | Performancea |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Epilepsy | |||||
|
|
|
3 features each in 8 frequency bins (4–128 Hz):
|
|
Sensitivity: 1.0 FPR: 0.0324 per hour |
Meisel and Bailey (2019)
|
|
|
|
|
IoC-F1 score: ≈ 0.7 |
Essential Tremor | |||||
Tan et al. (2019)
|
|
|
|
|
AUC: Movement: 0.74–0.99 Tremor: 0.79–0.88 |
Parkinson’s Disease | |||||
Gilron et al. (2021)
|
|
|
|
|
ROC-AUC: 0.81–1.0 Clustering concordance: 74% |
Swann et al. (2016)
|
|
|
|
|
ROC-AUC: 0.8–0.94 |
Hirschmann et al. (2017)
|
|
|
|
|
Accuracy: 0.84 ROC-AUC: 0.82 |
Yao et al. (2020c)
|
|
|
|
|
F1 score: 0.88 (XGBoost) |
Camara et al. (2015)
|
|
|
|
|
Accuracy: 0.64–1.00 (0.90 mean) |
Tourette Syndrome | |||||
Shute et al. (2016)
|
|
|
|
|
Recall: 0.39–0.89 Precision: 0.37–0.96 |
AUC – Area under the curve; CM-PF - centromedian-parafascicular complex; ECoG – Electrocorticography; HFO – High-frequency oscillation; IoC – Improvement over chance; k-NN - k-nearest neighbors; LDA – Linear discriminant analysis; LFP – Local field potential; MLP-NN – Multi-layer perceptron neural network; PAC – Phase-amplitude coupling; PSD – Power spectral density; RBF – radial basis function; ROC – Receiver operating characteristic; SGD – Stochastic gradient descent; STN – subthalamic nucleus; SVM – Support vector machine; XGBoost – Extreme gradient boosted decision tree.
Classification performance is not strictly comparable between studies, as design of the performance metrics was highly variable. If more than one algorithm was compared, only the score of best-performing algorithm is reported in this table.