Table 4.
Multinomial logistic regression analysis of association between RC and hypertension, T2DM and their co-existence in NHANES 2005–2018 (N = 17,749)
| Variables | Unadjusted | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) per unit | P value | OR (95% CI) per unit | P value | OR (95% CI) per unit | P value | OR (95% CI) per unit | P value | |
| No hypertension and no T2DM (n=11059) | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Only hypertension (n=3833) | 3.45 (3.08,3.87) | <0.001 | 2.03 (1.79,2.31) | <0.001 | 2.28 (1.98,2.63) | <0.001 | 1.55 (1.32,1.81) | <0.001 |
| Only T2DM (n=899) | 6.03 (5.05,7.21) | <0.001 | 3.71 (3.08,4.49) | <0.001 | 3.69 (2.98,4.56) | <0.001 | 2.45 (1.92,3.11) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension & T2DM (n=1958) | 6.58 (5.75,7.51) | <0.001 | 4.54 (3.88,5.32) | <0.001 | 5.65 (4.74,6.74) | <0.001 | 3.21 (2.61,3.94) | <0.001 |
Notes: Participants were classified into no hypertension and no T2DM, only hypertension, only T2DM, hypertension & T2DM
Model 1 was adjusted by age and sex; Model 2 was adjusted by age, sex, race, education, marital status, and PIR; Model 3 was additionally adjusted by smoking, alcohol, BMI levels, HEI, DII, and waist
Abbreviations: T2DM Type 2 diabetes, RC Remnant cholesterol, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval