Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 26;21:304. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03194-4

Table 5.

Characteristics and efficacy results from clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant immunotherapy

Clinical trail Sample size Stage Stage III (%) Drugs Cycles Surgical resection rate (%) MPR (%) pCR(%)
Checkmate 159 21 I–IIIA 33% Nivolumab 2 95.2% (20/21) 45% (9/20) 15% (3/20)
LCMC3 181 IB–IIIB 49% Atezolizumab 2 88% (159/181) 20% (29/143)a 6% (8/143)a
NEOSTAR 44 I–IIIA 22% Nivolumab/Ipilimumab 3 82.9% (34/41)

N 22% (5/23)

NI 38% (8/21)

N 9% (2/23)

NI 29% (6/21)

Sintilimab (ChiCTR-OIC-17013726) 40 IB–IIIA 45.5% Sintilimab 2 92.5% (37/40) 40.5% (15/37) 16.2% (6/37)
NADIM 41 IIIA 100% Nivolumab + CBDCA-pacilitaxel 3 89.1% (41/46) 83% (34/41) 63% (26/41)
Checkmate 816 358 IB–IIIA 63.7% Nivolumab + platinum-doublet chemotherapy 3 83%(149/179) 46.8%(66/14) 30.5%(43/141)
NCT02716038 30 IB–IIIA 77% Atezolizumab + CBDCA-nab pacilitaxel 4 97%(29/30) 57% (17/30) 33% (9/30)
SAKK16/14 68 IIIA 100% CDDP-docetaxel followed by durvalumab 3 82% (55/67) 62% (34/55) 18% (10/55)

aThese percentages exclude patients with EGFR/ALK + . CBDCA carboplatin, CDDP cisplatin, MPR major pathological response (≤ 10% viable tumor cells), pCR pathological complete response (0% viable tumor cells)