Abstract
Intussusception, a rare cause of bowel obstruction in adults, is even less common in the elderly population. Unlike pediatric cases, adult intussusception is primarily associated with pathologic diseases acting as lead points, often requiring surgical intervention. We present a case of an 84-year-old male with a medical history significant for multiple comorbidities, who was diagnosed with a large segment jejunojejunal intussusception resulting in small bowel obstruction. Surgical management was recommended, and an exploratory laparotomy with bowel resection was performed, including the excision of the leading point. This case highlights the challenges in diagnosing adult intussusception and the importance of surgical intervention due to the high incidence of associated pathologic diseases.
Keywords: ostomy, resection, case report, carcinoma, bowel obstruction, intussusception
Introduction
Intussusception is the telescoping or invagination of the proximal gastrointestinal tract into an adjacent section, requiring surgical correction to avoid bowel ischemia or perforation. Intussusception is an uncommon cause of adult intestinal obstructions, even rare in older people. All adult intussusception cases should be managed with surgical therapy, with the timing dependent on the patient's clinical condition. Adult patients, as opposed to children, need an exploratory laparotomy and resection, which includes the removal of the intussusception's focal site and any nonviable intestine found during the surgical inspection [1]. Only 1% to 5% of intestinal obstructions in adults are due to adult intussusception. In comparison to its pediatric equivalent, this illness shows a number of distinctions [1]. While air-contrast enemas and pneumatic or hydrostatic reduction are successful in treating intussusception in around 80% of cases involving adolescents, more than 90% of adult cases are associated with an underlying medical disease that serves as a trigger. The pathogenic elements often found during surgical operations include strictures, polyps, Meckel's diverticulum, carcinomas, colonic diverticula, or benign neoplasms [2,3]. Adults seldom undergo radiologic decompression as a preoperative procedure since there is a greatly increased risk of concomitant malignancy, which is found in around 65% [4]. Here we present a case of an 84-year-old male with small bowel obstruction secondary to intussusception, who was surgically managed.
Case presentation
We present a case of an 84-year-old male with a significant past medical history of chronic kidney disease (CKD), type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who was brought to the Emergency Department following a mechanical fall and altered mental status. He was found to be unresponsive with hypoglycemia (blood glucose level of 45 mg/dL). As a result, he was admitted for further evaluation. Initial head computed tomography (CT) scan results were unremarkable. Due to abdominal distension, a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis was performed, indicating suspected intussusception due to dilated bowel loops, and bowel-within-bowel appearance.
On review of the systems, the patient denied abdominal pain and nausea. He experienced some nausea during the placement of a nasogastric tube on the day of evaluation. He reported normal bowel movements three days prior to presentation and continued to pass flatus. He denied shortness of breath, chest pain, headache, paresthesia, limb weakness, and any other symptoms in other systems. Upon examination, the patient appeared alert and oriented with no acute distress. On head, eyes, nose, and throat (HENT) evaluation, he exhibited normocephalic status, intact extraocular movements, and no scleral icterus. A nasogastric tube was placed with approximately 700 cc of bilious output. He showed no signs of respiratory distress and exhibited non-labored respiration on 3 L of oxygen. Cardiovascular examination revealed a normal heart rate and regular rhythm with no murmurs, gallops, or rubs. There were no signs of peripheral edema or jugular venous distension. Distal pulses were strong and equal in all limbs. His abdomen was soft, distended, non-tender, with no rebound or guarding, and non-peritonitic. On musculoskeletal examination, no gross deformity of extremities was observed. The skin was warm and dry. On neurologic evaluation, the patient was found to be awake, alert, and oriented to person, place, and time. The psychiatric assessment showed him to be cooperative, with an appropriate mood, affect, and thought. Throughout his hospitalization, he exhibited normal lactate levels and no signs of leukocytosis. However, a repeat CT scan showed a large intussusception involving a long segment of the jejunum with an edematous appearance of the intussuscepted bowel within the mesenteric vessels (Figure 1). As a result, the surgical team was consulted, and surgical management was recommended.
Figure 1. CT of the abdomen showing a large long segment likely jejunojejunal intussusception resulting in small bowel obstruction with edematous changes of the involved bowel loops (arrow).
An assessment plan was made that the patient requires surgical management and the anesthesia team was consulted for exploratory laparotomy with possible bowel resection with either ostomy or primary anastomosis owing to the diagnosis of intussusception with small bowel obstruction. Written and informed consent was obtained from the patient and his wife. Cardiology and anesthesia consultations were completed. The patient was kept nil per oral (NPO), and a nasogastric tube was placed on low continuous wall suction. Antibiotics and heparin were administered as needed. A midline laparotomy incision was made, and the intussuscepted bowel was identified and reduced (Figure 2). A polyp that served as a lead point was found on the proximal portion of the bowel, approximately 10-15 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz. Around 60 cm of the small intestine along with the polyp was transected, and the bowel was anastomosed using staplers. The mesentery was transected with high ligation, including palpable lymph nodes. The peritoneal defect was approximated with a figure-of-eight silk suture, and the mesenteric defect was fixed with a running Vicryl suture. A crotch stitch was placed, and hemostasis was achieved. The fascia was closed with interrupted 1-0 Vicryl sutures. The patient had no signs of ischemia, and the rest of the intestine appeared healthy. The skin was closed in reverse fashion.
Figure 2. The intussuscepted bowel.
The patient's postoperative plan involved returning to the intensive care unit for further care. The procedure was performed successfully; the patient responded well to the given treatment and was discharged with out-patient follow-up.
Discussion
The term "intussusception" describes when one section of the intestine invades another. Intussusception is the most common reason for bowel obstruction in babies, although it is very uncommon in adults, especially in the elderly. Three different types of intussusception can occur: enteric, ileo-colic, and colo-colic [5]. Clinical signs of mechanically induced intestinal blockage include nausea, vomiting, and cramping in the abdomen. Adult intussusception must be diagnosed with a high degree of suspicion, a thorough review of medical history, and a thorough physical examination.
The heterogeneity in both clinical presentation and imaging results makes it difficult and hard to identify intussusception prior to surgery. While Reijnen et al. [6] noticed a somewhat higher preoperative diagnosis rate of 50%, Eisen et al. [7] reported a diagnostic rate of 40.7%. Plain abdominal X-rays are commonly used as the initial diagnostic method since obstructive symptoms frequently predominate the clinical picture. These pictures frequently show the symptoms of intestinal obstruction and may provide information about the location of the obstruction [8]. A barium enema examination may be helpful in detecting intussusception, exhibiting a typical "cup-shaped" filling defect [9,10]. A characteristic "stacked coin" look could also be seen in the upper gastrointestinal contrast series.
For both adults and children, ultrasound is recognized as a useful diagnostic tool for detecting intussusception [11,12]. The existence of a "target" sign on the transverse view and the development of the "pseudo-kidney" sign on the longitudinal view are examples of classic imaging features. Abdominal CT has emerged as the most sensitive radiological method for verifying intussusception, with reported diagnostic accuracies ranging from 58% to 100% [13-15]. A "target"-shaped soft tissue mass with a layering effect is a prominent feature that can be noticed on a CT scan. Another distinguishing characteristic is the presence of mesenteric arteries within the intestinal lumen [16].
Adults may appear with acute, subacute, or chronic nonspecific presentations of their symptoms. The variety of symptoms makes it difficult to make an early diagnosis, which frequently forces doctors to wait until the patient is in the operating room. The majority of surgeons agree that adult intussusception requires surgical intervention because of the high prevalence of anatomical abnormalities and the possibility of cancer. However, there is still disagreement on how to manipulate the intussusceptible intestine during reduction and how much intestinal resection is necessary [16]. Regarding the laparoscopic treatment of adult intussusception caused by benign and malignant diseases of the small and large intestines, various studies have been published [17-20]. Depending on the overall health of the patient and the availability of surgeons with appropriate laparoscopic experience, laparoscopy has been utilized successfully in a few circumstances. Adult patients are not frequently advised to employ preoperative reduction procedures utilizing barium or air as a regular course of treatment, in contrast to pediatric patients, whose intussusception is typically primary and benign [6,16,17].
Conclusions
Adult intussusception is an uncommon cause of bowel obstruction typically linked to underlying pathologic diseases, such as strictures, polyps, Meckel's diverticulum, carcinomas, colonic diverticulum, or benign neoplasms. Preoperative radiologic decompression is not recommended in adults due to the high incidence of concomitant cancer. A case report of an 84-year-old male with multiple comorbidities showed a large segment of jejunojejunal intussusception causing small bowel obstruction. Surgical management, including exploratory laparotomy and bowel resection, was performed, and the leading point of the intussusception was excised. Early diagnosis is crucial, especially given the higher prevalence of malignancy as a lead point in adult cases. Further research and collaborative efforts are needed to improve understanding and management of this uncommon condition in adults.
Acknowledgments
Per ICME guidelines, all authors had substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. They also defined the work and reviewed it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published; and had an agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Additionally, author affiliations are different due to the length of writing and finishing the case report. At the commencement of drafting the case report, all authors were affiliated with the same institution. However, as time progressed, the co-authors pursued different career paths, leading to their current affiliations being with diverse institutions. I (Niyaz Jamil) was involved in the care, case acquisition, and interpretation of patient information. I contributed to the write-up of the case report and image manipulation; assisted with coming up with the title; worked on citations/references, case presentation, and image development; reviewed the work critically for intellectual integrity; proofread the final version; and approves to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Rohan Raj contributed to the care, case acquisition, and interpretation of patient information; assisted in the write-up of the case report and outline of the manuscript; reviewed the work critically for intellectual integrity; proofread the final version; and approves to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Parvinder Kaur contributed to the care, case acquisition, and interpretation of patient information; reviewed the work critically for intellectual integrity; helped with the critical thinking and discussion of the manuscript; proofread the final version; and approves to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Rupert Chima contributed to the care, case acquisition, and interpretation of patient information; reviewed the work critically for intellectual integrity; wrote the abstract and conclusion of the paper; helped with image analysis and technical write-up of the manuscript; proofread the final version; and approves to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Maya Ann Francis contributed to the care, case acquisition, and interpretation of patient information; reviewed the work critically for intellectual integrity; wrote the introduction of the manuscript; proofread the final version; and approves to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Deepa Treesa Francis contributed to the care, case acquisition, and interpretation of patient information; reviewed the work critically for intellectual integrity; proofread the final version; and approves to be accountable for all aspects of the work She predominantly extracted the relevant data and worked on the case discussion and introduction in addition to assisting in the write-up of the conclusion, introduction, and discussion.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Adult intussusception. Azar T, Berger DL. Ann Surg. 1997;226:134–138. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199708000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Intussusception in adults. Stubenbord WT, Thorbjarnarson B. Ann Surg. 1970;172:306–310. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197008000-00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tumor-induced ileo-ileal invagination in adults. Akçay MN, Polat M, Cadirci M, Gencer B. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7992979/ Am Surg. 1994;60:980–981. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Surgical management of intussusception in the adult. Nagorney DM, Sarr MG, McIlrath DC. Ann Surg. 1981;193:230–236. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198102000-00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adult intussusception: a retrospective review. Honjo H, Mike M, Kusanagi H, Kano N. World J Surg. 2015;39:134–138. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2759-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Diagnosis and treatment of adult intussusception. Reijnen HA, Joosten HJ, de Boer HH. Am J Surg. 1989;158:25–28. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90309-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Intussusception in adults. Eisen LK, Cunningham JD, Aufses AH Jr. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:390–395. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00331-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sonographic diagnosis of intussusceptions in adults. Cerro P, Magrini L, Porcari P, De Angelis O. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:45–47. doi: 10.1007/s002619910008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Small bowel intussusception demonstrated by oral barium. Wiot JF, Spitz HB. Radiology. 1970;97:361–366. doi: 10.1148/97.2.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Intussusception induced by villous tumor of the colon: sonographic findings. Fujii Y, Taniguchi N, Itoh K. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002;30:48–51. doi: 10.1002/jcu.10025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ultrasonic diagnosis of adult intussusception. Boyle MJ, Arkell LJ, Williams JT. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8470658/ Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:617–618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ultrasonographic appearance of adult intussusception. Weissberg DL, Scheible W, Leopold GR. Radiology. 1977;124:791–792. doi: 10.1148/124.3.791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.The diagnosis and treatment of adult intussusception. Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Ando T, Sekihara M, Hara T, Kori T, Kuwano H. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;36:18–21. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200301000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ileocolic invagination in adult due to caecal carcinoma. Erbil Y, Eminoğlu L, Caliş A, Berber E. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9381902/ Acta Chir Belg. 1997;97:190–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adult intussusception: experience in Singapore. Tan KY, Tan SM, Tan AG, Chen CY, Chng HC, Hoe MN. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:1044–1047. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.t01-22-.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.The diagnosis and management of adult intussusception. Begos DG, Sandor A, Modlin IM. Am J Surg. 1997;173:88–94. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00419-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Clinical spectrum and surgical approach of adult intussusceptions: a multicentric study. Barussaud M, Regenet N, Briennon X, et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21:834–839. doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0789-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Laparoscopic management of small bowel intussusception in a 16-year-old with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Gonzalez AM, Clapp B. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18765065/ JSLS. 2008;12:332–334. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Laparoscopy-assisted resection of ileoileal intussusception caused by intestinal lipoma. Lin MW, Chen KH, Lin HF, Chen HA, Wu JM, Huang SH. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17:789–792. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Minimal access surgery for adult intussusception with subacute intestinal obstruction: a single center's decade-long experience. Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Senthilkumar R, Madankumar MV. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:487–491. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181468cda. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


