Table 2.
PFAS (ng/mL) | Median | Minimum | Maximum | LODa | Percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Both sites combined () | ||||||
PFOA | 704 | 6.40 | 55.90 | 0.1 | 0.14 | |
PFOS | 704 | 13.10 | 104.00 | 0.2 | 0.14 | |
PFNA | 704 | 1.50 | 15.50 | 0.1 | 0.14 | |
PFHxS | 704 | 3.50 | 192.00 | 0.1 | 0.14 | |
PFDeA | 641 | 0.30 | 1.20 | 0.1 and 0.2 | 22.62 | |
Me-PFOSA-AcOH | 704 | 0.70 | 14.65 | 0.2 | 4.4 | |
Et-PFOSA-AcOH | 704 | 0.14 | 3.10 | 0.1 and 0.2 | 85.37 | |
PFOSA | 704 | 0.07 | 1.60 | 0.05 and 0.1 | 85.51 | |
Greater Cincinnati () | ||||||
PFOA | 353 | 7.30 | 55.90 | 0.1 | 0.28 | |
PFOS | 353 | 13.60 | 96.00 | 0.2 | 0.28 | |
PFNA | 353 | 1.40 | 6.80 | 0.1 | 0.28 | |
PFHxS | 353 | 5.20 | 185.00 | 0.1 | 0.28 | |
PFDeA | 293 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 0.1 and 0.2 | 24.23 | |
Me-PFOSA-AcOH | 353 | 0.70 | 8.11 | 0.2 | 5.10 | |
Et-PFOSA-AcOH | 353 | 0.14 | 1.20 | 0.1 and 0.2 | 85.55 | |
PFOSA | 353 | 0.07 | 0.70 | 0.05 and 0.1 | 81.02 | |
San Francisco Bay Area () | ||||||
PFOA | 351 | 5.80 | 2.4 | 18.20 | NA | 0 |
PFOS | 351 | 12.50 | 3.8 | 104.00 | NA | 0 |
PFNA | 351 | 1.60 | 0.6 | 15.50 | NA | 0 |
PFHxS | 351 | 2.30 | 0.3 | 192.00 | NA | 0 |
PFDeA | 348 | 0.30 | 1.20 | 0.2 | 21.26 | |
Me-PFOSA-AcOH | 351 | 0.61 | 14.65 | 0.2 | 3.70 | |
Et-PFOSA-AcOH | 351 | 0.14 | 3.10 | 0.2 | 85.19 | |
PFOSA | 351 | 0.07 | 1.60 | 0.05 and 0.1 | 90.03 |
Note: Summary statistics were determined by using the univariate procedure in SAS. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Et-PFOSA-AcOH, acetic acid; LOD, limit of detection reported by CDC lab; Me-PFOSA-AcOH, acetic acid; NA, not available; PFAS, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances; PFDeA, perfluorodecanoic acid; PFHxS, perfluorohexane sulfonate; PFNA, perfluorononanoic acid; PFOA, perfluorooctanoic acid; PFOS, perflurooctanesulfonic acid; PFOSA, perfluorooctane sulfonaminde.
Samples were sent to the CDC lab in several batches. LODs of the PFAS were batch specific.