Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 26;131(9):097009. doi: 10.1289/EHP11811

Table 2.

PFAS serum measurements by site for the girls in the study, Greater Cincinnati and San Francisco Bay Area, 2004–2014.

PFAS (ng/mL) N Median Minimum Maximum LODa Percentage <LOD (%)
Both sites combined (n=704)
 PFOA 704 6.40 <LOD 55.90 0.1 0.14
 PFOS 704 13.10 <LOD 104.00 0.2 0.14
 PFNA 704 1.50 <LOD 15.50 0.1 0.14
 PFHxS 704 3.50 <LOD 192.00 0.1 0.14
 PFDeA 641 0.30 <LOD 1.20 0.1 and 0.2 22.62
 Me-PFOSA-AcOH 704 0.70 <LOD 14.65 0.2 4.4
 Et-PFOSA-AcOH 704 0.14 <LOD 3.10 0.1 and 0.2 85.37
 PFOSA 704 0.07 <LOD 1.60 0.05 and 0.1 85.51
Greater Cincinnati (n=353)
 PFOA 353 7.30 <LOD 55.90 0.1 0.28
 PFOS 353 13.60 <LOD 96.00 0.2 0.28
 PFNA 353 1.40 <LOD 6.80 0.1 0.28
 PFHxS 353 5.20 <LOD 185.00 0.1 0.28
 PFDeA 293 0.30 <LOD 1.00 0.1 and 0.2 24.23
 Me-PFOSA-AcOH 353 0.70 <LOD 8.11 0.2 5.10
 Et-PFOSA-AcOH 353 0.14 <LOD 1.20 0.1 and 0.2 85.55
 PFOSA 353 0.07 <LOD 0.70 0.05 and 0.1 81.02
San Francisco Bay Area (n=351)
 PFOA 351 5.80 2.4 18.20 NA 0
 PFOS 351 12.50 3.8 104.00 NA 0
 PFNA 351 1.60 0.6 15.50 NA 0
 PFHxS 351 2.30 0.3 192.00 NA 0
 PFDeA 348 0.30 <LOD 1.20 0.2 21.26
 Me-PFOSA-AcOH 351 0.61 <LOD 14.65 0.2 3.70
 Et-PFOSA-AcOH 351 0.14 <LOD 3.10 0.2 85.19
 PFOSA 351 0.07 <LOD 1.60 0.05 and 0.1 90.03

Note: Summary statistics were determined by using the univariate procedure in SAS. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Et-PFOSA-AcOH, 2-(N-ethyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid; LOD, limit of detection reported by CDC lab; Me-PFOSA-AcOH, 2-(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid; NA, not available; PFAS, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances; PFDeA, perfluorodecanoic acid; PFHxS, perfluorohexane sulfonate; PFNA, perfluorononanoic acid; PFOA, perfluorooctanoic acid; PFOS, perflurooctanesulfonic acid; PFOSA, perfluorooctane sulfonaminde.

a

Samples were sent to the CDC lab in several batches. LODs of the PFAS were batch specific.