Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 7;60(6):515–525. doi: 10.1590/2359-3997000000220

Table 3. Agreement between BMI and body fat percentage for defining obesity in Brazil, 3,822 male firefighters, 2009.

      Body fat % > 25%   Agreement: 85.8% (95%CI 84.7–86.9) Sensitivity: 47.4% (95%CI 43.4–51.5) Specificity: 93.1% (95%CI 92.2–93.9) Positive likelihood ratio: 6.87 (95%CI 5.90–8.00) Negative likelihood ratio: 0.56 (95%CI 0.52–0.61) Positive predictive value: 56.5% (95%CI 52.0–60.8) Negative predictive value: 90.4% (95%CI 89.3–91.4)
Yes No Total
N (%) N (%) N
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 Yes N (%) 288 (7.5%) 222 (5.8%) 510
No N (%) 319 (8.3%) 2,993 (78.3%) 3,312
  Total N 607 3,215 3,822
Alternative cut-offs
Cut-off 27 kg/m2 28 kg/m2 29 kg/m2
Agreement, % (95%CI) 69.9 (68.5–71.4) 77.7 (76.4–79.0) 82.9 (81.7–84.1)
Sensitivity, % (95%CI) 82.4 (79.1–85.3) 72.2 (68.4–75.7) 60.5 (56.4–64.4)
Specificity, % (95%CI) 67.6 (65.9–69.2) 78.8 (77.3–80.2) 87.2 (86.0–88.3)
Positive likelihood ratio, (95%CI) 2.54 (2.39–2.70) 3.40 (3.13–3.70) 4.72 (4.22–5.27)
Negative likelihood ratio, (95%CI) 0.26 (0.22–0.31) 0.35 (0.31–0.40) 0.45 (0.41–0.50)
Positive predictive value, % (95%CI) 32.4 (30.1–34.8) 39.1 (36.2–42.0) 47.1 (43.6–50.7)
Negative predictive value, % (95%CI) 95.3 (94.4–96.1) 93.7 (92.8–94.6) 92.1 (91.1–93.0)