Table 3.

Pearson correlation coefficients between impulsivity and possible negative correlates and protective factors in younger adolescents (13–15)

	Impulsivity
	n	r
Gender	3337	−0.03
Age	3337	0.01
Early memories of warmth and safeness	3237	−0.14***
Rational decision-making style	2365	−0.07***
Resilience	2955	−0.05**
Emotion regulation	3334	−0.16***
Coping	2400	0.14***
Parental attachment	2401	−0.27***
Social group attachment	2090	−0.24***
School satisfaction	3328	−0.12***
Satisfaction with classmates	3327	−0.05**
Satisfaction with peers from other classes	3329	−0.01
Satisfaction with friends from school	3325	−0.02
Satisfaction with teachers	3336	−0.15***
Satisfaction with school staff	3334	−0.09***
Satisfaction with parents	3327	−0.07***
Satisfaction with siblings	3081	−0.07***
Satisfaction with remaining family	3103	−0.06**

Impulsivity was measured using the Impulse, Self-harm and Suicide Ideation Questionnaire for Adolescents (ISSIQ-A; Barreto Carvalho et al., 2015). Rational decision-making style was measured using the General Decision-Making Style Scale (GDMSS; Scott & Bruce, 1995; Brazilian version by Löbler et al., 2019). Resilience was measured using the Resilience Scale (RS; Wagnild & Young, 1993; Portuguese version by Felgueiras et al., 2010). Emotion regulation was measured using the Situational Test of Emotion Management-Brief (STEM-B; Allen et al., 2015; Portuguese version by da Motta et al., 2021). Coping was measured using the Toulousiana Coping Scale (TCS; Esparbès et al., 1993; Portuguese version by Amaral-Bastos et al., 2015). Parental attachment was measured using the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA; Armsden & Greenberg, 1987; Portuguese version by Machado & Oliveira, 2007). Social group attachment was measured using the Social Group Attachment Scale (SGAS; Smith et al., 1999; Portuguese version by Dinis et al., 2008).

^*p < 0.05; ^**p < 0.01; ^***p < 0.001