Table 4.

Pearson correlation coefficients between impulsivity and possible negative correlates and protective factors in older adolescents (16–19)

	Impulsivity
	n	r
Gender	2836	−0.03
Age	2838	−0.02
Early memories of warmth and safeness	2761	−0.07***
Rational decision making-style	2079	−0.11***
Resilience	2510	0.04
Emotion regulation	2834	−0.21***
Coping	2092	0.09***
Parental attachment	2115	−0.22***
Social group attachment	1946	−0.20***
School satisfaction	2826	−0.05**
Satisfaction with classmates	2836	−0.03
Satisfaction with peers from other classes	2830	−0.02
Satisfaction with friends from school	2832	0.01
Satisfaction with teachers	2836	−0.08***
Satisfaction with school staff	2833	−0.03
Satisfaction with parents	2836	−0.06**
Satisfaction with siblings	2688	−0.03
Satisfaction with remaining family	2714	−0.04*

Impulsivity was measured using the Impulse, Self-harm and Suicide Ideation Questionnaire for Adolescents (ISSIQ-A; Barreto Carvalho et al., 2015). Rational decision-making style was measured using the General Decision-Making Style Scale (GDMSS; Scott & Bruce, 1995; Brazilian version by Löbler et al., 2019). Resilience was measured using the Resilience Scale (RS; Wagnild & Young, 1993; Portuguese version by Felgueiras et al., 2010). Emotion regulation was measured using the Situational Test of Emotion Management-Brief (STEM-B; Allen et al., 2015; Portuguese version by da Motta et al., 2021). Coping was measured using the Toulousiana Coping Scale (TCS; Esparbès et al., 1993; Portuguese version by Amaral-Bastos et al., 2015). Parental attachment was measured using the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA; Armsden & Greenberg, 1987; Portuguese version by Machado & Oliveira, 2007). Social group attachment was measured using the Social Group Attachment Scale (SGAS; Smith et al., 1999; Portuguese version by Dinis et al., 2008).

^*p < 0.05; ^**p < 0.01; ^***p < 0.001