Table 4:

Associations between neurocognitive impairment and educational obtainment, employment and independent living among survivors ≥25 year olds.

Domain	Impairmenta	Non-college graduate N (%)	RR (CI)	Non-full-time employment N (%)	RR (CI)	Living dependently N (%)	RR (CI)
Age ≤ 1
Task Efficiency	No	56 (38.62)	1	51 (35.92)	1	29 (20.14)	1
	Yes	24 (63.16)	1.67 (1.18– 2.35)	22 (59.46)	1.64 (1.14– 2.35)	15 (39.47)	2.05 (1.20– 3.51)
Emotional Regulation	No	53 (38.41)	1	53 (38.69)	1	34 (24.64)	1
	Yes	27 (60.00)	1.52 (1.09– 2.10)	20 (47.62)	1.15 (0.78– 1.68)	10 (22.73)	0.94 (0.50– 1.79)
Organization	No	58 (42.65)	1	54 (40.60)	1	29 (21.48)	1
	Yes	22 (46.81)	1.11 (0.77– 1.58)	19 (41.30)	1.01 (0.68– 1.50)	15 (31.91)	1.56 (0.93– 2.63)
Memory	No	51 (36.96)	1	53 (38.97)	1	32 (23.36)	1
	Yes	29 (64.44)	1.77 (1.30– 2.39)	20 (46.51)	1.19 (0.81– 1.74)	12 (26.67)	1.13 (0.63– 2.05)
Age > 1
Task Efficiency	No	67 (34.72)	1	75 (39.27)	1	41 (21.24)	1
	Yes	30 (68.18)	2.1 (1.56– 2.84)	23 (56.10)	1.25 (0.89– 1.74)	17 (37.78)	1.48 (0.91– 2.41)
Emotional Regulation	No	66 (35.11)	1	72 (38.71)	1	44 (23.40)	1
	Yes	31 (63.27)	1.87 (1.38– 2.54)	26 (56.52)	1.27 (0.93– 1.76)	14 (28.00)	0.83 (0.50– 1.38)
Organization	No	74 (40.00)	1	79 (43.41)	1	47 (25.41)	1
	Yes	23 (44.23)	1.12 (0.78– 1.60)	19 (38.00)	0.91 (0.62– 1.33)	11 (20.75)	0.86 (0.50– 1.49)
Memory	No	75 (37.31)	1	78 (39.20)	1	45 (22.39)	1
	Yes	22 (61.11)	1.67 (1.21– 2.30)	20 (60.61)	1.48 (1.07– 2.05)	13 (35.14)	1.39 (0.87– 2.23)

Abbreviations: RR, Relative Risk; CI, confidence interval; N, number; %; percent

Model adjusted for age at follow-up, sex, and race/ethnicity

^aImpairment is defined as a score ≥90th percentile of the siblings’ distribution