Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 9;12(17):18317–18326. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6429

TABLE 3.

Results of the univariate Cox models analyzing the association between MRONJ and time‐dependent variables and results of the multivariate Cox models analyzing the association between MRONJ and selected variables.

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) p value at Wald Test
Univariate Cox models
Antiogenetic treatment yes (*) versus no 2.01 (0.80,5.04) 0.1369
Dental extraction yes versus no 30.60 (17.66,53.03) <0.0001
Other dental treatments yes versus no 4.18 (2.40, 7.25) <0.0001
Multivariate Cox model
Age (years)* 0.0106
56 versus 30 3.22 (0.70, 14.82)
65 versus 30 3.01 (0.52, 17.56)
73 versus 30 1.58 (0.30, 8.45)
Previous Bisphosphonate Yes versus no 2.62 (1.40, 4.88) 0.0024
Type of Tumor 0.5024
Prostate versus breast 0.83 (0.37, 1.89)
Other versus breast 0.56 (0.21, 1.53)
Dental treatments before starting Dmab Yes versus no 1.26 (0.59, 2.68) 0.5517
Antiangiogenetic treatment yes (***) versus no 3.11 (0.94, 10.26) 0.0621
Dental extractions yes versus no 23.40 (12.98, 47.18) <0.0001
Dental treatments Yes versus no 3.67 (1.95, 6.88) 0.0001
Number Dmab doses <0.0001
6 versus 12 1.87 (1.15, 3.06)
6 versus 24 9.11 (4.13, 20.09)

Note: (*) Concomitant or follow‐up initiated antiangiogenetic drug assumption. (**) 56, 65, and 73 are, respectively, the first quartile, the median and the third quartiles of the age distribution. (***)Concomitant or follow‐up initiated antiangiogenetic drug assumption.