Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2023 Apr 12;14(5):e1787. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1787

Table 1.

A comparison of the scope and limitations of experiments in cell extract with in vitro reconstituted and in-cell single-molecule systems.

Experimental consideration In vitro reconstitution In live cells (in cellulo) In cell extract
Temperature of measurement Can be independently varied Confined to physiological temperatures Similar to in vitro, can be independently varied within optimized range
Concentration of component Can be independently varied Can be altered by manipulating gene expression characteristics Can be extended beyond in cellulo by doping in purified components
Purity of component Highly pure, but involves time-consuming purification steps Complex mixture Similar to in cellulo, but affords local “pull-down” to enrich for specific components (5154)
Macromolecular Crowding Can be simulated Has intrinsic crowding Can be simulated
Equilibrium measurements Long-term equilibration is possible Non-equilibrium Similar to in vitro
Experimentally tractable (long term imaging) Oxygen scavenging systems can enhance imaging times Short term imaging only Similar to in vitro
Small molecule testing and/or exchange Yes. Highly controllable Possible, but limited within the constraints of maintaining cell viability Similar to in vitro, but retaining much of the complexity of the cell