Table 4.
Demographic and other characteristics of survey respondents (n=271)
M | SD | |
---|---|---|
Age, years | 36.3 | 8.9 |
n | % | |
Female1 | 216 | 79.7 |
Grant Reviewer2 | 78 | 28.7 |
Location | ||
Asia | 2 | 0.7 |
Australia | 4 | 1.5 |
Europe | 5 | 1.8 |
North America | ||
United States | 249 | 91.9 |
Canada | 7 | 2.6 |
South America | 1 | 0.4 |
Years from terminal degree 3 | ||
< 1 year/graduate student | 75 | 27.7 |
1–5 | 101 | 37.3 |
6–10 | 43 | 15.9 |
11+ | 52 | 19.9 |
Professional Title | ||
Doctoral Student | 60 | 22.1 |
Post-doctoral Fellow | 53 | 19.6 |
Assistant Professor | 69 | 25.5 |
Associate Professor | 36 | 13.3 |
Professor | 21 | 7.7 |
Clinical Psychologist | 5 | 1.8 |
Leadership-focused role4 | 6 | 2.2 |
Research-focused role5 | 15 | 5.5 |
Other6 | 6 | 2.2 |
Published Study Designs 7 | ||
Cross-sectional | 217 | 80.1 |
Qualitative or Focus Group | 157 | 57.9 |
Longitudinal or Cohort | 145 | 53.5 |
Feasibility or Pilot | 140 | 51.7 |
Randomized Controlled Trial | 130 | 48.0 |
Systematic Review or Meta-Analysis | 109 | 40.2 |
Commentary | 82 | 30.3 |
Methods or Quantitative | 65 | 24.0 |
Protocol | 72 | 26.6 |
Quasi-experimental | 42 | 15.5 |
No experience selected | 4 | 1.5 |
0.74% (n=2) respondents identified as non-binary/prefer not to respond.
Respondents were asked if they had served as a reviewer for competitive federal or government grants in the past three years.
Mean and SD in table, and Median in manuscript included graduate students (calculated as “0”) and less than one year from terminal degree (calculated as “0.5”). Scale stopped at 30+ (calculated as “30”).
Leadership roles encompass titles such as “director.”
Research roles encompass titles such as “research coordinator.”
Other encompasses titles such as “faculty” or “grant writer.”
Respondents were asked to select the types of articles they had published (primary author or co-author) in the last 3 years.