Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Immunology. 2023 May 24;170(2):180–192. doi: 10.1111/imm.13663

Complement: functions, location, and implications

Samer Kareem, Alexander Jacob *, John Mathew *,*, Richard J Quigg, Jessy J Alexander ‡
PMCID: PMC10524990  NIHMSID: NIHMS1902292  PMID: 37222083

Abstract

The complement system, an arm of the innate immune system plays a critical role in both health and disease. The complement system is highly complex with dual possibilities, helping or hurting the host, depending on the location and local microenvironment. The traditionally known functions of complement include surveillance, pathogen recognition, immune complex trafficking, processing and pathogen elimination. The noncanonical functions of the complement system include their roles in development, differentiation, local homeostasis and other cellular functions. Complement proteins are present in both, the plasma and on the membranes. Complement activation occurs both extra- and intracellularly, which leads to considerable pleiotropy in their activity. In order to design more desirable and effective therapies, it is important to understand the different functions of complement, and its location-based and tissue-specific responses. This manuscript will provide a brief overview into the complex nature of the complement cascade, outlining some of their complement independent functions, their effects at different locale and their implication in disease settings.

Keywords: Complement, intracellular, noncanonical, autoimmune

Graphical Abstract:

graphic file with name nihms-1902292-f0001.jpg

The complement system is an evolutionarily old field discovered in the 1800s, with an expanding landscape and novel nuances. This review will give a brief insight into some of these findings shown in the graphical abstract. Gaining deeper insights into the mechanisms involved and their validation will help translate the findings to new therapies.

INTRODUCTION:

The complement system is a complex, dynamic, and ubiquitous system1–3 of more than 50 sequentially arranged proteins. It was discovered by Jules Bordet4 in late 1800s as a host defense mechanism. However, with advancement in knowledge, there is increasing appreciation that the complement system has a greater functional relevance, participating in novel functions including maintaining homeostasis, development, and regulating synaptic pruning. In addition, a growing list of diseases in which complement plays a critical role, and an expanding complement therapeutic toolbox has led to a resurgence of interest and excitement in the field. This review will delve into some novel functions, expanding locations and disease settings of the complement system.

The Complement system and its activation:

The complement system is a sequential enzymatic cascade that forms a critical arm of the innate immune system1, 5, 6. The cascade consists of three pathways: the classical, alternative and lectin pathways that differ in their mode of initiation. The classical pathway (CP) is activated by immune complexes (IC) formed through antigen/antibody interactions and by non-immune ligands7 that cause conformational changes, making it conducive for the complex to interact with C1q. The lectin pathway (LP)8 is activated when mannose-binding lectins (MBL) or ficolins expressed on surfaces of the pathogen or glycoproteins are recognized. Once the pathways are activated, MBL and C1q of the LP and CP pathways bind to serine proteases, MASP, and C1r and C1s respectively to cleave complement components C4 and C2 to form C4b2b, the C3 convertase enzyme that cleaves C3 to C3a and C3b. In contrast to CP and LP, the alternative pathway (AP) constantly surveys the host for pathogen invasion and is always in a low-level active state, spontaneously hydrolyzing the thioester bond in C39, 10. When activated, the C3b that is generated binds to Bb formed by cleavage of factor (F) B by FD. The C3 convertase, C3bBb is stabilized by the protein properdin11 and will further cleave C3 to C3a and C3b forming a feedback loop that continuously activates the AP3, 12. There is a significant structural and sequence similarity between C4/C2 and C3/FB, indicating similarity in the formation of the CP/LP and the AP C3 convertase. Subsequently, all three pathways follow an identical effector pathway, ultimately forming C5b-9 membrane attack complex (Fig 1) that cause pathogen lysis and the release of C5a. By products such as C3a and C5a generated during complement activation have substantial biologic activity, and participate in different functions like chemotaxis and cell trafficking. They signal through G-protein coupled receptors C3aR and C5aR13. The exact functions of the byproduct C4a still remains incompletely understood. The complement proteins are both, soluble plasma proteins and membrane bound proteins. The pathways, although essential for survival, when overwhelmed they can go awry and cause host destruction, as in autoimmune disorders. Therefore, they are strictly modulated by regulatory proteins such as factor H, CR1, DAF and MCP that belong to the ‘regulators of complement activation’ gene family on chromosome 1q32 in humans and a comparable genomic location in mice14. The complement regulators are located at strategic points along the pathways, preventing injudicious complement activation and host injury.

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

Schematic of the complement system showing the classical, lectin and alternative pathways.

Complement functions and novel nuances:

The complement system is an important arm of the innate immune system with well documented roles in host defense. The functions of the complement cascade involving host defense include the following: (1) Surveillance of the host sensing danger by recognition of the pattern recognition receptors (PRR). (2) Opsonization of pathogens and dead cells, labelling them for uptake and phagocytosis. (3) immune complex (IC) trafficking by C3b/ligand interaction on the erythrocyte surface. (4) generation of anaphylatoxins, supporting chemotaxis of immune cells to the site of injury and modulation of vascular permeability. (5) MAC formation and pathogen lysis. With increase in our understanding, helped by new technologies and computational tools, several novel functions of the complement system are coming to light. They range from development15 and regeneration16, to homeostasis and cell survival17. These functions occur in the different organ systems from skin18, 19 on the exterior, to the most protected interior organ, the brain20, 21. Due to the vastness of the field and the limitation of space, we will present a brief overview, outlining some of the novel functions and expanding locations of complement.

Metabolism:

Metabolism is the fundamental basis of life and is crucial for survival22. It involves both catabolic reactions that liberate energy and anabolic reactions that consume energy and thereby regulating cellular homeostasis. The rapidly growing field of ‘immunometabolism’ that links the immune system and the metabolic machinery include complement-dependent modulation of metabolism. Complement and metabolism are closely intertwined with pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) forming the connecting link as, PRRs recognize pathogens protecting against infections and act as sensors of metabolic changes23. The complement system modulates metabolism, thereby balancing cell survival vs cell death24. C3a generated by the intracellular complement (complosome) engages C3aR located on the lysosomes, which activates mTOR that modulates glycolysis and cell survival25. The crosstalk between complosome and cell metabolic machinery, mitochondria are reviewed in detail elsewhere26, 27. Complement modulates oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), glycolysis, and the amino acid (AA) and glucose transporters in these cells through crosstalks with intracellular sensor, and effector, pathways. One such example is the crosstalk between complement and NLRP3. NLRPs are ‘guardians of cell function’ that respond to danger signals indicating loss of cell homeostasis. Complement in conjunction with cellular metabolism modulates NLRP3 inflammasome assembly. C5a activates NLRP3 with the subsequent generation of the cytokines, IL6 and IL-1β in human and mice T cells28. The complement protein CD46 regulates the T cell metabolic threshold, and thereby modulates T cell polarization29, 30. In dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages both C3a and LPS were required for the generation of IL-1β, while C3a only enhanced LPS-induced IL-1β production in monocytes31. Recent studies show that sublytic MAC deposition shifted human macrophages towards glycolysis inducing the activation of NLRP332. Similar to T cells, absence of FH in human and mouse kidney endothelial cells results in actin remodeling with increase in OXPHOS, proliferation and angiogenesis33. C5a present intracellularly binds to the intracellular C5aR and induces ROS. In mice retina, bisretinoids that are byproducts of vitamin A accumulate in the RPE lysosomes, and prevent lysosome exocytosis causing a buildup of the C5b-9 membrane attack complex (MAC) and a reduction of CD59. The MAC accumulation in the RPE setting results in mitochondrial fragmentation and increase in oxidative stress, which is alleviated by reducing cholesterol or ceramide34. The C-glucose-lipid metabolism axis is linked to the NLRP3 inflammasome in the hematopoetic stem cells and regulate their trafficking and proliferation35, 36. The C3 fragment, C3a-desArg, functions as a hormone that has metabolic effects such as insulin resistance and facilitates triglyceride metabolism37–39. Activation, differentiation, proliferation and function of immune cells are dependent on, or modulated by, metabolic programming. Therefore, gaining insight into these pathways in each setting will help enunciate new therapies for different diseases.

Synaptic pruning:

Complement plays an important role from brain structure to brain function, as recognized by results obtained in different stress environments. A serendipitous and impactful finding discovered while investigating whether astrocytes have a role in refining synaptic connections, is that complement protein C1q tags synapses for pruning by the microglia21. This finding changed our belief from, complement in brain leans towards inflammation, destruction and disease, to the understanding that complement in brain is a ‘double edge sword’ on the one hand complement is a mode of defense, while on the other hand it plays a critical role in refinement during development and growth. Synaptic pruning is a developmental process40 where superfluous and weak synapses tagged are by C1q, and subsequently phagocytosed and eliminated by microglia21, 41. Synapses are modulated both during development and in adult life, achieved through crosstalk between the glial cells and involves C1q, CR3, and CX3CR1/CX3CL142. Astrocytes express TGFβ, thereby increasing neuronal C1q expression recognized by the microglia ready to phagocytose synapses. The microglia limit astrocytic synaptic uptake by signaling through TREM243, 44. Disturbance of the crosstalk regulation results in pathological synapse elimination in psychiatric and neurodegenerative settings45. Homeostasis is maintained for optimal neuronal and synaptic function by the network of glial cells. Microglia modulate neuronal activity by monitoring synaptic elements, oligodendroglia protect the transmission of impulses by maintaining the myelin sheaths, and the astroglia participate in neurotransmitter recycling, maintain ionic homeostasis, refine synapses and provide metabolic substrates46, 47. Synapses help create memory. Complement coated weak synapses are eliminated by microglia during the sleep cycle48. Synaptic priming is changed to structural alterations creating long-term memory during sleep. Neuronal loss in the thalamus coincides with increased C1q expression and altered sleep spindles and epileptic spikes in mice49. Complement and microglia mediate synaptic loss and function and are considered risk factors for schizophrenia and Alzheimers50. The ongoing discoveries of complement proteins and functions in the brain suggests more novel components may yet be uncovered.

Immune complex (IC) trafficking:

Once the pathogen is recognized, complement is activated. Complement activation generates fragments C3b and C4b that covalently coat the target, maintain solubility and mediate trafficking of ICs by engaging with complement receptors on different immune cells. ICs are transported to CR3- and FcγR-bearing cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system for elimination51, 52. The transportation occurs by two pathways. Firstly, the ICs are carried to the spleen or liver for disposal, by the binding of C3b coated ICs to the immune adherence receptor (C3b ligand, CR1) present on primate RBCs. The second instance of C-mediated transport of ICs occur in the lymph nodes. ICs are strong inducers of antibody response. Using two photon microscopy it is established that the antigen/ICs that arrive at the lymph node are captured by the subscapular macrophages and transferred to the follicular B cells through the participation of the complement receptors CR1, CR2 and FcRgII53. This novel pathway and exceptions are described in detail in the review by Gonzalez et al54. In humans, as mentioned earlier, the ICs are transported by RBCs. However, in rodents, the ICs are transported by platelets and CR1 was not the ligand. Our studies showed for the first time that the rodent immune adherence receptor is complement factor H on platelets as surrogate to primate CR1 on erythrocytes55. In addition, the glomerular podocyte present at the interface of the vasculature performs the function of immune adherence eliminating ICs from settling in the kidney. Using kidney transplants our studies showed that similar to the cells in circulation, complement factor H in rodent podocytes was the functional proxy of CR1 in primate podocytes performing the function of immune adherence, facilitating IC processing thereby limiting complement activation56. More recently, using NEP25/hybridoma mice with sublytic podocyte injury, Zoshima et al showed that glomerular CFH cleared subendothelial IC deposits57. Once ICs are opsonized they enhance the release of NETs by neutrophils58. Complement activation byproducts C3a and C5a interact with their respective G-coupled receptors and mediate the influx of scavenger cells through the vasculature (chemotaxis) to the site of infection and inflammation59. Phagocytes transmigrate across the endothelium to reach the site of injury/infection. Antigen is recognized in the periphery, while antigen presentation and T cell activation occurs in the lymph nodes, and the ICs have to reach the spleen and liver for disposal, which shows that diapedesis60 or extravasation (enter and leave tissues transcellularly through endothelial cells)61 is an important facet of IC processing and elimination.

Vasculature and Thrombosis:

Complement activation generates C3a, C4a and C5a. C3a and C5a signals through their respective G-coupled receptors, C3aR and C5aR, and participate in the complex process of leukocyte recruitment62, and modulates vascular endothelium63. Receptor for C4a remains to be identified. However C4a acts as a ligand for protease-activated receptor (PAR)1 and PAR4 and alters endothelial permeability64. Paradoxes are evident in different complement dependent processes, including diapedesis. C3aR inhibits of neutrophil mobilization and is associated with worsening ischemia/reperfusion injury65, while it accelerates leukocyte mobilization into the brain66. The tissue infiltrating cells (macrophages and T cells) have increased expression of intracellular C3, induced by engagement of the integrin lymphocyte-function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1, or CD11a/CD18) on immune cells by intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) on vascular endothelial cells, showing that integrin/complosome modulation is critical for tissue immunity67. On the other hand, infiltrating T cells that were isolated from RA patients had increased C3 mRNA that correlated with disease severity and is suggested as a marker for inflammation. Different complement proteins such as C1q68, the anaphylatoxins, C3a and C5a69–71, complement regulators, FH33, 72, 73 and CD5974 and, sublytic MAC75 modulate proliferation of different cells. Complement modulates proliferation in both circulating cells such as T cells and tissue resident cells such as vascular endothelial cells. Depending on the setting, proliferation can have a positive impact enabling regeneration of damaged tissue or negative impact causing tissue denudation76 or tumor amplification77. Once complement activation occurs, it can cause endothelial cell activation, platelet activation and thrombus formation. Platelets are present at the intersection of the coagulation and complement pathways; platelet activation can cause complement activation and vice versa. Therefore, complement dysregulation on/in platelets can modulate platelet activity78. Coagulation can be initiated by C3a, C5a and MASP2, cleaving prothrombin to thrombin, finally resulting in clot formation79. Once C5b-9 is formed on the platelet surface, platelet microparticles80 that express binding sites for the FXa/FVa prothrombinase complex are released, triggering pro-coagulant activity81, 82. Platelet activation can lead to hemostasis and thrombosis in both large and small vessels. Platelets provide a scaffold for C3 to bind in the form of C3(H2O), with the breakdown products subsequently serving as ligands for CD11b/CD18 expressed on leukocytes. This interaction mediates the formation of platelet-neutrophil and platelet-monocyte aggregates83.

Self-tolerance:

complement participates in self/nonself recognition or self-tolerance through apoptotic cell recognition and phagocytic clearance84. C1q involvement in self-tolerance is recognized, given the finding that C1q insufficiency allows autoantibody production, complement activation and cytokine production in response to late phase apoptotic cells68, 85. CD59 serves as a ‘regulator of cell fate by enhancing lysis and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells15. CR3 and CR2 capture antigens forming CR3-CR2-iC3b-antigen complexes and present to antigen specific B cell receptors (BCRs)86, thereby modulating B cell signaling, which is one of the links between innate and adaptive immune systems. CR2 modulates CD5+ B-1 cells, antibody titers, and size and number of germinal centers87. CD5+ B-1 cells are a subset of B cells that produce IgM and a limited repertoire of antibodies dominated by a specific set of genes that mostly encode autoreactive antibodies against autoantigens such as single-strand DNA (ssDNA) and IgG. During inflammation or infection, the generation of substantial amount of C3 byproducts can alter B cell signaling, leading to breakdown of tolerance and positive selection of autoreactive B cell clones, thereby modulating tolerance88. The engagement of iC3b with its receptor CR3 on APCs induces the generation of TGFb and IL-10 that participates in tolerance89. Further, C4 has an important role in the negative selection of self-reactive B cells90.

Autophagy:

Autophagy is a key intracellular catabolic pathway that eliminates damaged organelles and modulates cellular differentiation, antigen presentation, phagocytosis, cytokine production and cell death.91–93 Dysfunctional autophagy can lead to pathology, such as senescence, neurodegenerative diseases and others94–96. A number of complement proteins are involved in autophagy, intracellular quality control homeostatic mechanism where they degrade cytoplasmic components and deliver them to lysosomes controlled by highly conserved autophagy-associated proteins (Atg)97, 98. Autophagy comprises of three different mechanisms: microautophagy99, chaperone-mediated autophagy100 and macro autophagy (often referred to as autophagy)101, 102. C3 is expressed intracellularly in pancreatic B cells, where they link to Atg and regulate autophagosome maturation. C3 could function as an intracellular opsonin, since intracellular pathogens are growth restricted by C3 linking to Atg and inducing autophagy103, also known as xenophagy, which is prevented by C3 degradation. Intrinsic C3 preserves optimal autophagic function and maintains basal flux of autophagy104, thereby enabling glucose tolerance and maintenance of B cell architecture in stressful settings105–107. On the other hand, whether autophagy modulates intracellular complement, and whether intracellular complement directly marks material for autophagy remains to be understood. Complement receptor of the immunoglobulin superfamily (CRIg) binds C3b and iC3b, induces autophagy and eliminates pathogens. Studies reveal that anaphylatoxin signaling through C3a/C3aR and C5a/C5aR inhibit autophagy108, while others show that C5a can induce autophagy in lung alveolar macrophages. Intrinsic C3 preserves optimal autophagic function and maintains basal flux of autophagy104, thereby enabling glucose tolerance and maintenance of B cell architecture in stressful settings105–107. Understanding the underlying mechanisms involved in autophagy in different settings and the crosstalk between the paths will provide avenues to develop new therapeutic modalities.

Complement participates in a diverse and expanding list of functions. It is important to understand whether the extracellular and intracellular pools of complement are a continuum, or they respond and react as two different pools at different locations and in different settings. This is critically important while defining unique biomarkers, and designing effective therapeutic targets and their mode of delivery.

Complement system and its expanding locations:

Complement proteins are ubiquitous, covering the landscape of different organs (Fig 2) and different cells, with their roles at each location being worked out. Historically, complement activation is known to occur in the extravascular space, with the main proteins such as C3 and C5, synthesized by the liver and liberated into circulation2, 3. During complement activation, both the core proteins C3 and C5 are cleaved by the respective convertases to the, a and b fragments in the fluid-phase and on surfaces. Now we know that, complement proteins are expressed in different cells and tissues109 with varying distribution and compartmentalization110. Around 2013, the complement field took a turn showing that complement activation not only occurred extracellularly, but also occurs intracellularly in circulating and tissue resident cells and through different mechanisms17, 111,112. The elegant work of Liszewski et al17 showed that in human T cells, C3 is cleaved by cathepsin L with the generation of C3a that induces interferon-γ secretion113 through the engagement of C3aR and membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46)17, 24, 25, 114. In mice T cells complement activation differs from humans in that C3 is not cleaved by cathepsin but by C3 convertase113 and mice do not express CD46115. Our results have shown that FH is intrinsically expressed in kidney endothelial cells, and its absence resulted in cytoskeletal remodeling, increased angiogenic potential, loss of cellular layer integrity, increased cell proliferation and modulation of the respiratory flux33. FH and the NF-κB work in synergistically in RPE cells and maintain the intricate balance between cytokines and complement116. Intracellular C3 in cardiomyocytes protected the heart from ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice117. Increasing the complexity of the field further, studies showed that C has a differential locational expression-For eg. C3 and C5 are expressed primarily in renal tubular epithelial cells, while C3aR1 and C5aR1 are expressed in interstitial cells.118 C3 and the complement inhibitor CD46 differ in their localization, with C3 being intracellular and CD46 being membrane bound, and they interact to protect epithelial cells from oxidative stress119, 120. Uncontrolled AP activation affects the cells121, 122 in some diseases and cell membrane123 in others. Emerging evidence show that intracellular complement activation modulates oncogenesis in a convertase-independent manner by cathepsin D124. In renal cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma complement FH is present in two distinct compartments, the membranous and intracellular compartments and modulates the tumor in a cell specifc manner73. In the brain, an immune privileged organ that is protected from circulating complement proteins by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), complement is intrinsically synthesized by the different brain cells, including neurons, astroglia, microglia125 and endothelial cells126. Similar to other tissues, complement in brain can be both beneficial and detrimental. C1q contributes to optimal brain development by regulating synaptic pruning, while an increase in anaphylatoxins can render the BBB “leaky”, leaving the brain susceptible to all circulating toxins and inflammatory cells63, 127, 128.

Fig 2.

Fig 2.

Complement affects different organs: Dysfunctional complement can affect one or all organs; therefore, it is important to gain insight into the occurrences in each setting

Complement regulators that are present in large amounts in the plasma are stored in alpha granules and secreted from platelets in very limited amounts, suggesting that the platelet pool of these proteins could be of distinct functional significance129. Our results revealed that rodent megakaryocytes have the RNA synthesis machinery for the generation of FH130. As mentioned earlier, CFH present on the surface of rodent platelets is the immune adherence receptor. Interestingly, Licht et al. demonstrated the ability of human megakaryocytes and platelets to express intrinsic CFH distinct from the granules, which can modulate platelet structure and function131. The platelet surface is protected from proteolytic C activation83. This is understandable with FH that suppresses complement activation bound to the surface. C3 binds to platelets in the form of C3(H2O) and serves as a ligand for CD11b/CD18, mediating heterotypic interactions with neutrophils and monocytes (Fig 3). Platelets can also serve as a scaffold where C3(H2O) binds to the platelet surface through properdin. A complexity of the complement cascade is that in some instances, complement proteins functionally duplicate other complement proteins. If uncontrolled complement activation occurs, or if the complement system is overwhelmed, it could result in a systemic response inducing or aggravating diseases that are systemic or localized to organs such as the kidney, brain, heart, eye, intestine, skin and lung (Fig 2)132, 133. In addition, dysfunction of the pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)134–138 and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) by which complement recognition and sensing of pathogens occur, underlie a number of autoimmune diseases139–143. DAMPs are endogenous danger molecules that are released from damaged or dying cells and activate the innate immune system by interacting with pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Although DAMPs contribute to the host’s defense, they promote pathological inflammatory responses. Recent studies have suggested that various DAMPs, such as high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), S100 proteins, and heat shock proteins (HSPs), are increased and considered to have a pathogenic role in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. HMGB1 causes classical complement pathway activation through C1q and cleaves C3 inducing formation of the MAC complex both in vitro in endothelial cells and in inflammatory mouse models144, 145. Similarly, HSPs, also called the chaperone and stress signal proteins, activate the classical pathway by complexing with antibodies and by mechanisms independent of antibody engagement146.

Fig 3.

Fig 3.

Cell interactions: Heterotypic interactions between neutrophils (N), monocytes (M) and platelets. P, properdin.

Complement and autoimmune diseases:

Complement inhibitors are being evaluated for different rheumatic diseases147. Dysfunction of the immune system due to abnormal responses to self antigens, is the underlying factor causing about 80 inflammatory diseases, the autoimmune diseases, for which the current therapies are often toxic and less than fully effective10. Here, we will focus on the common autoimmune diseases148 such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)149, 150, diabetes151, 152, rheumatoid arthritis (RA)153 and multiple sclerosis (MS)154. These diseases are polygenic155, 156 with complement proteins playing critical roles in aggravating and sometimes inducing the disease pathology. Genetic deficiency of the classical complement proteins C1 and C4 resulted in familial SLE with a penetrance/frequency of up to 90% and 80%, respectively. There could be an even higher prevalence since we have no records of prenatal loss. Complement proteins also form part of the clinical profile in these patients. Complement alterations can cause disease due to different mechanisms that include increased generation of proinflammatory molecules such as cytokines, autophagy, impaired scavenging or removal of toxic substances and loss of self-tolerance. However, whether the complement pathway is the driver of the disease pathology, or is an effect of the disease, still remains uncertain. The intrinsic generation of complement proteins by different cells, and the intracellular complement activation and associated interferon γ production, as observed in T cells from patients with autoimmune arthritis, suggest that the ‘complosome’ may be of wider significance114. It is widely acknowledged that complement also plays a role in immune response resolution and repair of tissue. For example, it modulates Th1 contraction preventing the pathological consequences observed in RA, SLE67, 157, 158 and MS29, 159. Diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus are highly variable diseases with symptoms ranging from skin photosensitivity to inflammation in organs such as the joints, skin, kidneys, lining of the heart and lungs, brain, and blood cells, making diagnosis perplexing. On the other hand, diseases such as RA have more localized effects like polyarticular synovitis leading to cartilage, tendon and bone destruction, and pain and dysfunction of the joints. In circulation and in the localized fluids of these patients, increased levels of complement activation products are present, often correlating with disease activity. Interestingly, serum FH decreased with disease progression in SLE and increased with disease progression in progressive MS160, 161. In SLE, complement paradox increases the complexity of the disease, since complement activation aggravates the disease while absence of early complement components such as C1q render the patients susceptible to the disease162–165. Diseases such as MS are predominantly T-cell-mediated inflammatory disease. The complosome in the T cell is activated differently compared to serum complement and its response in each setting still remains to be completely understood. Proteolysis of C3 yields C3a, a soluble anaphylatoxin that activates both protective and damaging immune responses against neurons through C3aR engagement166. Membrane bound C3b activates CR3+ microglia to trigger activation that can be detrimental to cell integrity. C3 and the terminal complex C5b-9 in MS CSF/CNS positively correlated with the clinical disability, brain lesions and neuronal injury167, 168. One problem with the detection of complement activation products is that the complement system is susceptible to in vitro activation, resulting in artificially high levels of activation products in plasma samples. Wouters et al.169 recently described novel activation products of complement, which consist of covalent complexes between C1q and activated C4. This new marker is not only specific for activation of the classical pathway of complement, but also is remarkably stable in plasma, avoiding artifacts. Wang et al.170, 171 had previously shown that systemic administration of the anti-C5 monoclonal antibody (mAb) effectively inhibits terminal complement activation in vivo and that anti-C5 mAb treatment prevents the onset of arthritis in mice and is also highly effective in ameliorating established disease. These results demonstrate an important role for activated terminal C components not only in the induction but also in the progression of disease in this model of immune-mediated joint inflammation. However, in contrast to SLE, neutralization of HMGB1 protects cartilage from degradation and prevents bone destruction in experimental RA, indicating it is important to study the different pathways in different settings and locale to define effective therapeutics. Although autoimmune diseases are all the result of a dysfunctional immune system, they differ in the pathology and the underpinning mechanisms. Further, pan inhibition of complement system will leave the patient open to infections. Therefore, it is important that we gain an in depth understanding of the role of complement in different settings to identify the most effective therapeutic targets for the disease.

Complement therapeutics:

The reader is referred to several comprehensive reviews on the topic172–175. Eculizumab176, 177, a humanized, monoclonal C5 antibody is the first complement inhibitor to be approved for clinical use. It prevents cleavage of C5, and thereby, the formation of C5a and C5b-9. Although successful in treating the disease, eculizumab inhibits the terminal pathway and leaves the patient susceptible to certain infections178–180. The clinical use of Eculizumab for different diseases has highlighted the critical role of complement in many pathological settings. A second anti-C5 monoclonal antibody ravulizumab has been approved for treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria176 and is currently being assessed in COVID19 patients181. The oral C5a receptor antagonist, avacopan182–184, is currently in trials for different diseases. With the discovery of novel functions, differing functional relevance at different locations and increased recognition for the significance of the complement system in a number of disease settings, there is a renewed interest that will continue to reshape the development of C therapeutics by identifying C proteins as markers and therapeutic targets.

CONCLUSION:

Extensive scientific evidence is now available supporting a role of complement system in the pathogenesis of a number of diseases. Increased insights into complement relevance in these settings reveal the complexity of the complement landscape, ranging from different function at different locations to the many interacting pathways. The pathogenic involvement of the complement system in autoimmune diseases has been described both by the genetic or functional deficiencies of certain components and by excessive activation of the complement system in both preclinical models and human patients. This has provided the pathogenic basis for the development of therapies aimed at blocking different facets of complement. However, since complement function in many instances are contextual and paradoxical, studies addressing local complement, its interaction with plasma complement in each setting, its complement dependent and independent functions, and additional randomized and controlled studies are needed (a) to confirm the usefulness and improvement if necessary, of the existing therapies, and (b) to design more effective therapies for different settings.

Acknowledgements:

This work was supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health grants 1R01DK111222 (to J.J.A).

Abbreviations:

CP

Classical pathway

LP

Lectin pathway

P

Alternative pathway

F

Factor

C3aR

C3a receptor

C5aR

C5a receptor

IC

immune complexes

PRRs

Pathogen recognition receptors

AA

Amino Acids

DC

Dendritic cells

RPE

Retinal pigment epithelium

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

MAC

Membrane Attack Complex

ROS

Reactive Oxygen Species

MBL

Mannose-binding lectins

RA

Rheumatoid Arthritis

SLE

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus67, 157, 158

MS

Multiple Sclerosis

Abbreviations for complement proteins include

C3, FB, C1r,C1s, C4, C2, C5b-9

complement breakdown products

C3a, C5a, C4a, C3b, C5b, C4b, iC3b

complement convertases

C4b2b, C3bBb, C4b2b3b, C3bBb3b

Complement regulators/receptors

FH, CR1, CR2, CR3, CD11b, DAF, CD46, MCP, C3aR, C5aR

Footnotes

Abbreviations for complement proteins include: C3, FB, C1r,C1s, C4, C2, C5b-9; complement breakdown products: C3a, C5a, C4a, C3b, C5b, C4b, iC3b; complement convertases C4b2b, C3bBb, C4b2b3b, C3bBb3b; Complement regulators/receptors: FH, CR1, CR2, CR3, CD11b, DAF, CD46, MCP, C3aR, C5aR.

Conflict of interest: None.

Contributor Information

Alexander Jacob, Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203..

John Mathew, Department of Rheumatology. Christian Medical College, IDA Scudder Rd, Vellore, India 632004.

Jessy J. Alexander, Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203.

REFERENCES:

  • 1.Carroll MV, Sim RB. Complement in health and disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2011; 63: 965–975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walport MJ. Complement. Second of two parts. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1140–1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Walport MJ. Complement. First of two parts. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1058–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cavaillon JM, Sansonetti P, Goldman M. 100th Anniversary of Jules Bordet’s Nobel Prize: Tribute to a Founding Father of Immunology. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 2114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bohlson SS, Garred P, Kemper C, et al. Complement Nomenclature-Deconvoluted. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 1308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Merle NS, Church SE, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, et al. Complement System Part I - Molecular Mechanisms of Activation and Regulation. Front Immunol 2015; 6: 262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kishore U, Ghebrehiwet B. Editorial: C1q: A Molecular Bridge to Innate and Adaptive Immunity. Front Immunol 2020; 11: 417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Beltrame MH, Catarino SJ, Goeldner I, et al. The lectin pathway of complement and rheumatic heart disease. Front Pediatr 2014; 2: 148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ricklin D, Hajishengallis G, Yang K, et al. Complement: a key system for immune surveillance and homeostasis. Nat Immunol 2010; 11: 785–797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ballanti E, Perricone C, Greco E, et al. Complement and autoimmunity. Immunol Res 2013; 56: 477–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen JY, Cortes C, Ferreira VP. Properdin: A multifaceted molecule involved in inflammation and diseases. Mol Immunol 2018; 102: 58–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taylor P, Botto M, Walport M. The complement system. Curr Biol 1998; 8: R259–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wetsel RA. Structure, function and cellular expression of complement anaphylatoxin receptors. Curr Opin Immunol 1995; 7: 48–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zipfel PF, Skerka C. Complement regulators and inhibitory proteins. Nat Rev Immunol 2009; 9: 729–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kimberley FC, Sivasankar B, Paul Morgan B. Alternative roles for CD59. Mol Immunol 2007; 44: 73–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mastellos DC, Deangelis RA, Lambris JD. Complement-triggered pathways orchestrate regenerative responses throughout phylogenesis. Semin Immunol 2013; 25: 29–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liszewski MK, Kolev M, Le Friec G, et al. Intracellular complement activation sustains T cell homeostasis and mediates effector differentiation. Immunity 2013; 39: 1143–1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chehoud C, Rafail S, Tyldsley AS, et al. Complement modulates the cutaneous microbiome and inflammatory milieu. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 15061–15066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bahia El Idrissi N, Iyer AM, Ramaglia V, et al. In Situ complement activation and T-cell immunity in leprosy spectrum: An immunohistological study on leprosy lesional skin. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0177815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stephan AH, Barres BA, Stevens B. The complement system: an unexpected role in synaptic pruning during development and disease. Annu Rev Neurosci 2012; 35: 369–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stevens B, Allen NJ, Vazquez LE, et al. The classical complement cascade mediates CNS synapse elimination. Cell 2007; 131: 1164–1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Judge A, Dodd MS. Metabolism. Essays Biochem 2020; 64: 607–647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Coll RC, O’Neill L, Schroder K. Questions and controversies in innate immune research: what is the physiological role of NLRP3? Cell Death Discov 2016; 2: 16019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kolev M, Dimeloe S, Le Friec G, et al. Complement Regulates Nutrient Influx and Metabolic Reprogramming during Th1 Cell Responses. Immunity 2015; 42: 1033–1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Arbore G, Kemper C. A novel “complement-metabolism-inflammasome axis” as a key regulator of immune cell effector function. Eur J Immunol 2016; 46: 1563–1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rahman J, Singh P, Merle NS, et al. Complement’s favourite organelle-Mitochondria? Br J Pharmacol 2021; 178: 2771–2785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Phieler J, Garcia-Martin R, Lambris JD, et al. The role of the complement system in metabolic organs and metabolic diseases. Semin Immunol 2013; 25: 47–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arbore G, West EE, Spolski R, et al. T helper 1 immunity requires complement-driven NLRP3 inflammasome activity in CD4(+) T cells. Science 2016; 352: aad1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Astier AL. T-cell regulation by CD46 and its relevance in multiple sclerosis. Immunology 2008; 124: 149–154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Arbore G, West EE, Rahman J, et al. Complement receptor CD46 co-stimulates optimal human CD8(+) T cell effector function via fatty acid metabolism. Nat Commun 2018; 9: 4186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Asgari E, Le Friec G, Yamamoto H, et al. C3a modulates IL-1beta secretion in human monocytes by regulating ATP efflux and subsequent NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Blood 2013; 122: 3473–3481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jimenez-Duran G, Kozole J, Peltier-Heap R, et al. Complement membrane attack complex is an immunometabolic regulator of NLRP3 activation and IL-18 secretion in human macrophages. Front Immunol 2022; 13: 918551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mahajan S, Jacob A, Kelkar A, et al. Local Complement Factor H protects kidney endothelial cell structure and function. Kidney Int 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tan LX, Germer CJ, La Cunza N, et al. Complement activation, lipid metabolism, and mitochondrial injury: Converging pathways in age-related macular degeneration. Redox Biol 2020; 37: 101781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Adamiak M, Ciechanowicz A, Chumak V, et al. Novel Evidence That Alternative Pathway of Complement Cascade Activation is Required for Optimal Homing and Engraftment of Hematopoietic Stem/progenitor Cells. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2022; 18: 1355–1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chumak VCV, Adamiak M, Thapa A, Abdelbaset-Ismail A, Bujko K, Ratajczak J, Kucia M, Ratajczak MZ. Novel Evidence That Intracellular Complement Network (complosome) Is Expressed in Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSPCs) and Regulates Their Trafficking, Metabolism, and Proliferation in an Intracrine-Dependent Manner By Engaging Pattern Recognition Receptor Nlrp3 Inflammasome. Blood 2022; 140: 1987–1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Barbu A, Hamad OA, Lind L, et al. The role of complement factor C3 in lipid metabolism. Mol Immunol 2015; 67: 101–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Copenhaver M, Yu CY, Hoffman RP. Complement Components, C3 and C4, and the Metabolic Syndrome. Curr Diabetes Rev 2019; 15: 44–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Copenhaver MM, Yu CY, Zhou D, et al. Relationships of complement components C3 and C4 and their genetics to cardiometabolic risk in healthy, non-Hispanic white adolescents. Pediatr Res 2020; 87: 88–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Paolicelli RC, Bolasco G, Pagani F, et al. Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science 2011; 333: 1456–1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bialas AR, Stevens B. TGF-beta signaling regulates neuronal C1q expression and developmental synaptic refinement. Nat Neurosci 2013; 16: 1773–1782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 42.Schafer DP, Lehrman EK, Kautzman AG, et al. Microglia sculpt postnatal neural circuits in an activity and complement-dependent manner. Neuron 2012; 74: 691–705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Allen NJ, Lyons DA. Glia as architects of central nervous system formation and function. Science 2018; 362: 181–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chung WS, Allen NJ, Eroglu C. Astrocytes Control Synapse Formation, Function, and Elimination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2015; 7: a020370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gomez-Arboledas A, Acharya MM, Tenner AJ. The Role of Complement in Synaptic Pruning and Neurodegeneration. Immunotargets Ther 2021; 10: 373–386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ullian EM, Sapperstein SK, Christopherson KS, et al. Control of synapse number by glia. Science 2001; 291: 657–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Koehler RC, Roman RJ, Harder DR. Astrocytes and the regulation of cerebral blood flow. Trends Neurosci 2009; 32: 160–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Choudhury ME, Miyanishi K, Takeda H, et al. Phagocytic elimination of synapses by microglia during sleep. Glia 2020; 68: 44–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Holden SS, Grandi FC, Aboubakr O, et al. Complement factor C1q mediates sleep spindle loss and epileptic spikes after mild brain injury. Science 2021; 373: eabj2685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sekar A, Bialas AR, de Rivera H, et al. Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4. Nature 2016; 530: 177–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hebert LA. The clearance of immune complexes from the circulation of man and other primates. Am J Kidney Dis 1991; 17: 352–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schifferli JA, Taylor RP. Physiological and pathological aspects of circulating immune complexes. Kidney Int 1989; 35: 993–1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Phan TG, Grigorova I, Okada T, et al. Subcapsular encounter and complement-dependent transport of immune complexes by lymph node B cells. Nat Immunol 2007; 8: 992–1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gonzalez SF, Lukacs-Kornek V, Kuligowski MP, et al. Complement-dependent transport of antigen into B cell follicles. J Immunol 2010; 185: 2659–2664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Alexander JJ, Hack BK, Cunningham PN, et al. A protein with characteristics of factor H is present on rodent platelets and functions as the immune adherence receptor. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 32129–32135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Alexander JJ, Wang Y, Chang A, et al. Mouse podocyte complement factor H: the functional analog to human complement receptor 1. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 1157–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zoshima T, Hara S, Yamagishi M, et al. Possible role of complement factor H in podocytes in clearing glomerular subendothelial immune complex deposits. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 7857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Palmer LJ, Damgaard C, Holmstrup P, et al. Influence of complement on neutrophil extracellular trap release induced by bacteria. J Periodontal Res 2016; 51: 70–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Klos A, Tenner AJ, Johswich KO, et al. The role of the anaphylatoxins in health and disease. Mol Immunol 2009; 46: 2753–2766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Carman CV. Mechanisms for transcellular diapedesis: probing and pathfinding by ‘invadosome-like protrusions’. J Cell Sci 2009; 122: 3025–3035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Medzhitov R Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 2008; 454: 428–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gasque P, Singhrao SK, Neal JW, et al. The receptor for complement anaphylatoxin C3a is expressed by myeloid cells and nonmyeloid cells in inflamed human central nervous system: analysis in multiple sclerosis and bacterial meningitis. J Immunol 1998; 160: 3543–3554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jacob A, Hack B, Chiang E, et al. C5a alters blood-brain barrier integrity in experimental lupus. FASEB J 2010; 24: 1682–1688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang H, Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Complement-activation fragment C4a mediates effector functions by binding as untethered agonist to protease-activated receptors 1 and 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114: 10948–10953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wu MC, Brennan FH, Lynch JP, et al. The receptor for complement component C3a mediates protection from intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injuries by inhibiting neutrophil mobilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 9439–9444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wu F, Zou Q, Ding X, et al. Complement component C3a plays a critical role in endothelial activation and leukocyte recruitment into the brain. J Neuroinflammation 2016; 13: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kolev M, West EE, Kunz N, et al. Diapedesis-Induced Integrin Signaling via LFA-1 Facilitates Tissue Immunity by Inducing Intrinsic Complement C3 Expression in Immune Cells. Immunity 2020; 52: 513–527 e518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bossi F, Tripodo C, Rizzi L, et al. C1q as a unique player in angiogenesis with therapeutic implication in wound healing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111: 4209–4214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Markiewski MM, Mastellos D, Tudoran R, et al. C3a and C3b activation products of the third component of complement (C3) are critical for normal liver recovery after toxic injury. J Immunol 2004; 173: 747–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Coulthard LG, Hawksworth OA, Conroy J, et al. Complement C3a receptor modulates embryonic neural progenitor cell proliferation and cognitive performance. Mol Immunol 2018; 101: 176–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kerekes K, Prechl J, Bajtay Z, et al. A further link between innate and adaptive immunity: C3 deposition on antigen-presenting cells enhances the proliferation of antigen-specific T cells. Int Immunol 1998; 10: 1923–1930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Boudhabhay I, Roumenina LT. Complement factor H: a guardian within? Kidney Int 2021; 100: 747–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Daugan MV, Revel M, Thouenon R, et al. Intracellular Factor H drives tumor progression independently of the complement cascade. Cancer Immunol Res 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Longhi MP, Sivasankar B, Omidvar N, et al. Cutting edge: murine CD59a modulates antiviral CD4+ T cell activity in a complement-independent manner. J Immunol 2005; 175: 7098–7102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fosbrink M, Niculescu F, Rus H. The role of c5b-9 terminal complement complex in activation of the cell cycle and transcription. Immunol Res 2005; 31: 37–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Willows J, Brown M, Sheerin NS. The role of complement in kidney disease. Clin Med (Lond) 2020; 20: 156–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Roumenina LT, Daugan MV, Petitprez F, et al. Context-dependent roles of complement in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2019; 19: 698–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kim H, Conway EM. Platelets and Complement Cross-Talk in Early Atherogenesis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2019; 6: 131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wallis R Interactions between mannose-binding lectin and MASPs during complement activation by the lectin pathway. Immunobiology 2007; 212: 289–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wiedmer T, Sims PJ. Participation of protein kinases in complement C5b-9-induced shedding of platelet plasma membrane vesicles. Blood 1991; 78: 2880–2886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wiedmer T, Esmon CT, Sims PJ. On the mechanism by which complement proteins C5b-9 increase platelet prothrombinase activity. J Biol Chem 1986; 261: 14587–14592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wiedmer T, Esmon CT, Sims PJ. Complement proteins C5b-9 stimulate procoagulant activity through platelet prothrombinase. Blood 1986; 68: 875–880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hamad OA, Mitroulis I, Fromell K, et al. Contact activation of C3 enables tethering between activated platelets and polymorphonuclear leukocytes via CD11b/CD18. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114: 1207–1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Amarilyo G, Verbovetski I, Atallah M, et al. iC3b-opsonized apoptotic cells mediate a distinct anti-inflammatory response and transcriptional NF-kappaB-dependent blockade. Eur J Immunol 2010; 40: 699–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ghebrehiwet B, Hosszu KK, Valentino A, et al. Monocyte Expressed Macromolecular C1 and C1q Receptors as Molecular Sensors of Danger: Implications in SLE. Front Immunol 2014; 5: 278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bajic G, Yatime L, Sim RB, et al. Structural insight on the recognition of surface-bound opsonins by the integrin I domain of complement receptor 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 16426–16431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ahearn JM, Fischer MB, Croix D, et al. Disruption of the Cr2 locus results in a reduction in B-1a cells and in an impaired B cell response to T-dependent antigen. Immunity 1996; 4: 251–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nielsen CH, Fischer EM, Leslie RG. The role of complement in the acquired immune response. Immunology 2000; 100: 4–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sohn JH, Bora PS, Suk HJ, et al. Tolerance is dependent on complement C3 fragment iC3b binding to antigen-presenting cells. Nat Med 2003; 9: 206–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Prodeus AP, Goerg S, Shen LM, et al. A critical role for complement in maintenance of self-tolerance. Immunity 1998; 9: 721–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Nakahira K, Cloonan SM, Mizumura K, et al. Autophagy: a crucial moderator of redox balance, inflammation, and apoptosis in lung disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 2014; 20: 474–494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ryter SW, Mizumura K, Choi AM. The impact of autophagy on cell death modalities. Int J Cell Biol 2014; 2014: 502676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Deretic V, Saitoh T, Akira S. Autophagy in infection, inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2013; 13: 722–737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kamat PK, Kalani A, Kyles P, et al. Autophagy of mitochondria: a promising therapeutic target for neurodegenerative disease. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014; 70: 707–719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Omata Y, Lim YM, Akao Y, et al. Age-induced reduction of autophagy-related gene expression is associated with onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Neurodegener Dis 2014; 3: 134–142. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Mizumura K, Choi AM, Ryter SW. Emerging role of selective autophagy in human diseases. Front Pharmacol 2014; 5: 244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mizushima N, Komatsu M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell 2011; 147: 728–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HW. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature 2011; 469: 323–335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Bao XX, Xie BS, Li Q, et al. Nifedipine induced autophagy through Beclin1 and mTOR pathway in endometrial carcinoma cells. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012; 125: 3120–3126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Dice JF. Chaperone-mediated autophagy. Autophagy 2007; 3: 295–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Deretic V, Prossnitz E, Burge M, et al. Autophagy, Inflammation, and Metabolism (AIM) Center of Biomedical Research Excellence: supporting the next generation of autophagy researchers and fostering international collaborations. Autophagy 2018; 14: 925–929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Dikic I, Elazar Z. Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018; 19: 349–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sorbara MT, Foerster EG, Tsalikis J, et al. Complement C3 Drives Autophagy-Dependent Restriction of Cyto-invasive Bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 2018; 23: 644–652 e645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Jung HS, Chung KW, Won Kim J, et al. Loss of autophagy diminishes pancreatic beta cell mass and function with resultant hyperglycemia. Cell Metab 2008; 8: 318–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Watada H, Fujitani Y. Minireview: Autophagy in pancreatic beta-cells and its implication in diabetes. Mol Endocrinol 2015; 29: 338–348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bachar-Wikstrom E, Wikstrom JD, Ariav Y, et al. Stimulation of autophagy improves endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced diabetes. Diabetes 2013; 62: 1227–1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Bachar-Wikstrom E, Wikstrom JD, Kaiser N, et al. Improvement of ER stress-induced diabetes by stimulating autophagy. Autophagy 2013; 9: 626–628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Nguyen DKH, Thombre R, Wang J. Autophagy as a common pathway in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurosci Lett 2019; 697: 34–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Reichhardt MP, Meri S. Intracellular complement activation-An alarm raising mechanism? Semin Immunol 2018; 38: 54–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Song D, Zhou W, Sheerin SH, et al. Compartmental localization of complement component transcripts in the normal human kidney. Nephron 1998; 78: 15–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kemper C, Kohl J. Novel roles for complement receptors in T cell regulation and beyond. Mol Immunol 2013; 56: 181–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Martin M, Leffler J, Smolag KI, et al. Factor H uptake regulates intracellular C3 activation during apoptosis and decreases the inflammatory potential of nucleosomes. Cell Death Differ 2016; 23: 903–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Strainic MG, Liu J, Huang D, et al. Locally produced complement fragments C5a and C3a provide both costimulatory and survival signals to naive CD4+ T cells. Immunity 2008; 28: 425–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Arbore G, Kemper C, Kolev M. Intracellular complement - the complosome - in immune cell regulation. Mol Immunol 2017; 89: 2–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Tsujimura A, Shida K, Kitamura M, et al. Molecular cloning of a murine homologue of membrane cofactor protein (CD46): preferential expression in testicular germ cells. Biochem J 1998; 330 ( Pt 1): 163–168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Armento A, Murali A, Marzi J, et al. Complement Factor H Loss in RPE Cells Causes Retinal Degeneration in a Human RPE-Porcine Retinal Explant Co-Culture Model. Biomolecules 2021; 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Torp MK, Ranheim T, Schjalm C, et al. Intracellular Complement Component 3 Attenuated Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in the Isolated Buffer-Perfused Mouse Heart and Is Associated With Improved Metabolic Homeostasis. Front Immunol 2022; 13: 870811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Portilla D, Xavier S. Role of intracellular complement activation in kidney fibrosis. Br J Pharmacol 2021; 178: 2880–2891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kulkarni HS, Elvington ML, Perng YC, et al. Intracellular C3 Protects Human Airway Epithelial Cells from Stress-associated Cell Death. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2019; 60: 144–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Tsai YG, Wen YS, Wang JY, et al. Complement regulatory protein CD46 induces autophagy against oxidative stress-mediated apoptosis in normal and asthmatic airway epithelium. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 12973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Sethi S, Gamez JD, Vrana JA, et al. Glomeruli of Dense Deposit Disease contain components of the alternative and terminal complement pathway. Kidney Int 2009; 75: 952–960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Smith RJ, Alexander J, Barlow PN, et al. New approaches to the treatment of dense deposit disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 2447–2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Noris M, Galbusera M, Gastoldi S, et al. Dynamics of complement activation in aHUS and how to monitor eculizumab therapy. Blood 2014; 124: 1715–1726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ding P, Xu Y, Li L, et al. Intracellular complement C5a/C5aR1 stabilizes beta-catenin to promote colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell Rep 2022; 39: 110851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Kunz N, Kemper C. Complement Has Brains-Do Intracellular Complement and Immunometabolism Cooperate in Tissue Homeostasis and Behavior? Front Immunol 2021; 12: 629986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Mahajan SD, Tutino VM, Redae Y, et al. C5a induces caspase-dependent apoptosis in brain vascular endothelial cells in experimental lupus. Immunology 2016; 148: 407–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Jacob A, Alexander JJ. Complement and blood-brain barrier integrity. Mol Immunol 2014; 61: 149–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Jacob A, Hack B, Chen P, et al. C5a/CD88 signaling alters blood-brain barrier integrity in lupus through nuclear factor-kappaB. J Neurochem 2011; 119: 1041–1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Blair P, Flaumenhaft R. Platelet alpha-granules: basic biology and clinical correlates. Blood Rev 2009; 23: 177–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Alexander JJ, Aneziokoro OG, Chang A, et al. Distinct and separable roles of the complement system in factor H-deficient bone marrow chimeric mice with immune complex disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: 1354–1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Licht C, Pluthero FG, Li L, et al. Platelet-associated complement factor H in healthy persons and patients with atypical HUS. Blood 2009; 114: 4538–4545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Complement in immune and inflammatory disorders: therapeutic interventions. J Immunol 2013; 190: 3839–3847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Complement in immune and inflammatory disorders: pathophysiological mechanisms. J Immunol 2013; 190: 3831–3838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Guo H, Callaway JB, Ting JP. Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat Med 2015; 21: 677–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Heesterbeek DAC, Angelier ML, Harrison RA, et al. Complement and Bacterial Infections: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Applications. J Innate Immun 2018; 10: 455–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Liu Y, Olagnier D, Lin R. Host and Viral Modulation of RIG-I-Mediated Antiviral Immunity. Front Immunol 2016; 7: 662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Odendall C, Kagan JC. Activation and pathogenic manipulation of the sensors of the innate immune system. Microbes Infect 2017; 19: 229–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Vijay K Toll-like receptors in immunity and inflammatory diseases: Past, present, and future. Int Immunopharmacol 2018; 59: 391–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Botto M, Dell’Agnola C, Bygrave AE, et al. Homozygous C1q deficiency causes glomerulonephritis associated with multiple apoptotic bodies. Nat Genet 1998; 19: 56–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Holers VM, Demoruelle MK, Kuhn KA, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis and the mucosal origins hypothesis: protection turns to destruction. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018; 14: 542–557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Toubi E, Vadasz Z. Innate immune-responses and their role in driving autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev 2019; 18: 306–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.West EE, Afzali B, Kemper C. Unexpected Roles for Intracellular Complement in the Regulation of Th1 Responses. Adv Immunol 2018; 138: 35–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.West EE, Kolev M, Kemper C. Complement and the Regulation of T Cell Responses. Annu Rev Immunol 2018; 36: 309–338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Kim SY, Son M, Lee SE, et al. High-Mobility Group Box 1-Induced Complement Activation Causes Sterile Inflammation. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Son M, Porat A, He M, et al. C1q and HMGB1 reciprocally regulate human macrophage polarization. Blood 2016; 128: 2218–2228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Prohaszka Z, Singh M, Nagy K, et al. Heat shock protein 70 is a potent activator of the human complement system. Cell Stress Chaperones 2002; 7: 17–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Trouw LA, Pickering MC, Blom AM. The complement system as a potential therapeutic target in rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2017; 13: 538–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Mihai S, Hirose M, Wang Y, et al. Specific Inhibition of Complement Activation Significantly Ameliorates Autoimmune Blistering Disease in Mice. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Bao L, Quigg RJ. Complement in lupus nephritis: the good, the bad, and the unknown. Semin Nephrol 2007; 27: 69–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Alexander JJ, Quigg RJ. Systemic lupus erythematosus and the brain: what mice are telling us. Neurochem Int 2007; 50: 5–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Smith JM, Mandava N, Tirado-Gonzalez V, et al. Correlation of Complement Activation in Aqueous and Vitreous in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2022; 11: 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Tan SM, Ziemann M, Thallas-Bonke V, et al. Complement C5a Induces Renal Injury in Diabetic Kidney Disease by Disrupting Mitochondrial Metabolic Agility. Diabetes 2020; 69: 83–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Holers VM, Banda NK. Complement in the Initiation and Evolution of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Morgan BP, Gommerman JL, Ramaglia V. An “Outside-In” and “Inside-Out” Consideration of Complement in the Multiple Sclerosis Brain: Lessons From Development and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front Cell Neurosci 2020; 14: 600656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Okada Y, Eyre S, Suzuki A, et al. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis: 2018 status. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78: 446–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Demirkaya E, Sahin S, Romano M, et al. New Horizons in the Genetic Etiology of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus-Like Disease: Monogenic Lupus and Beyond. J Clin Med 2020; 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Cardone J, Le Friec G, Vantourout P, et al. Complement regulator CD46 temporally regulates cytokine production by conventional and unconventional T cells. Nat Immunol 2010; 11: 862–871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Ellinghaus U, Cortini A, Pinder CL, et al. Dysregulated CD46 shedding interferes with Th1-contraction in systemic lupus erythematosus. Eur J Immunol 2017; 47: 1200–1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Astier AL, Meiffren G, Freeman S, et al. Alterations in CD46-mediated Tr1 regulatory T cells in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest 2006; 116: 3252–3257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Ingram G, Hakobyan S, Hirst CL, et al. Complement regulator factor H as a serum biomarker of multiple sclerosis disease state. Brain 2010; 133: 1602–1611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Ingram G, Hakobyan S, Loveless S, et al. Complement regulator factor H in multiple sclerosis. J Cell Biochem 2011; 112: 2653–2654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Carroll MC. The lupus paradox. Nat Genet 1998; 19: 3–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Peerschke EI, Yin W, Alpert DR, et al. Serum complement activation on heterologous platelets is associated with arterial thrombosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid antibodies. Lupus 2009; 18: 530–538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Walport MJ. Complement and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res 2002; 4 Suppl 3: S279–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Walport MJ, Davies KA, Botto M. C1q and systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunobiology 1998; 199: 265–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Pekna M, Stokowska A, Pekny M. Targeting Complement C3a Receptor to Improve Outcome After Ischemic Brain Injury. Neurochem Res 2021; 46: 2626–2637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Tatomir A, Talpos-Caia A, Anselmo F, et al. The complement system as a biomarker of disease activity and response to treatment in multiple sclerosis. Immunol Res 2017; 65: 1103–1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Rus H, Cudrici C, Niculescu F. C5b-9 complement complex in autoimmune demyelination and multiple sclerosis: dual role in neuroinflammation and neuroprotection. Ann Med 2005; 37: 97–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Wouters D, Wiessenberg HD, Hart M, et al. Complexes between C1q and C3 or C4: novel and specific markers for classical complement pathway activation. J Immunol Methods 2005; 298: 35–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Wang Y, Kristan J, Hao L, et al. A role for complement in antibody-mediated inflammation: C5-deficient DBA/1 mice are resistant to collagen-induced arthritis. J Immunol 2000; 164: 4340–4347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Wang Y, Rollins SA, Madri JA, et al. Anti-C5 monoclonal antibody therapy prevents collagen-induced arthritis and ameliorates established disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92: 8955–8959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Mastellos DC, Reis ES, Lambris JD. Editorial: Therapeutic Modulation of the Complement System: Clinical Indications and Emerging Drug Leads. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 3029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Mastellos DC, Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Clinical promise of next-generation complement therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2019; 18: 707–729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Ricklin D, Mastellos DC, Lambris JD. Therapeutic targeting of the complement system. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Thurman JM, Yapa R. Complement Therapeutics in Autoimmune Disease. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Kulasekararaj AG, Hill A, Rottinghaus ST, et al. Ravulizumab (ALXN1210) vs eculizumab in C5-inhibitor-experienced adult patients with PNH: the 302 study. Blood 2019; 133: 540–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Mache CJ, Acham-Roschitz B, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, et al. Complement inhibitor eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 1312–1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.McNamara LA, Topaz N, Wang X, et al. High Risk for Invasive Meningococcal Disease Among Patients Receiving Eculizumab (Soliris) Despite Receipt of Meningococcal Vaccine. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017; 66: 734–737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Socie G, Caby-Tosi MP, Marantz JL, et al. Eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: 10-year pharmacovigilance analysis. Br J Haematol 2019; 185: 297–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Harris CL, Pouw RB, Kavanagh D, et al. Developments in anti-complement therapy; from disease to clinical trial. Mol Immunol 2018; 102: 89–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Annane D, Heming N, Grimaldi-Bensouda L, et al. Eculizumab as an emergency treatment for adult patients with severe COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: A proof-of-concept study. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 28: 100590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Jayne DRW, Bruchfeld AN, Harper L, et al. Randomized Trial of C5a Receptor Inhibitor Avacopan in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 28: 2756–2767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Merkel PA, Jayne DR, Wang C, et al. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Avacopan, a C5a Receptor Inhibitor, in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis Treated Concomitantly With Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine: Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9: e16664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Merkel PA, Niles J, Jimenez R, et al. Adjunctive Treatment With Avacopan, an Oral C5a Receptor Inhibitor, in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis. ACR Open Rheumatol 2020; 2: 662–671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES