Table 1.

Description of the 12 factors of resilience presented by Saavedra and Villalta [15].

Factor	Definition
Identity: F1 I am-Basic Condition.	Judgments that reflect the way a person interprets actions and circumstances in the social and cultural context. This defines the person in a reasonably stable way, giving them a sense of historical continuity.
Autonomy: F2 I am-View of oneself.	Judgments that reflect the person’s contribution to their sociocultural surroundings.
Satisfaction: F3 I am-View of the problem.	Judgments that show the interpretation a person makes about a problematic situation.
Pragmatism: F4 I am-Resilient response.	Judgments that give an account of how a person interprets their actions.
Links: F5 I have-Basic conditions.	Judgments about the value of primary socialization considering the affective and social bonds a person has that reflect their personal history.
Networks: F6 I am-View of the problem.	Judgments related to a person’s affective bonds with their close surroundings.
Models: F7 I have-View of the problem.	Judgments that reflect the person’s beliefs about the support their close social circle can offer in problematic situations.
Goals: F8 I have-Responses.	Judgments about the value of the proposed goals include people close to them who are considered essential and available to support them in difficult times.
Affectivity: F9 I can-Basic conditions.	Judgments about the possibilities of managing emotions and expressing them while building trusting relationships.
Self-efficacy: F10 I can-View of oneself.	Judgments that reflect the evaluation of the possibilities of successfully solving the problem.
Learning: F11 I can-view of the problem.	Judgments indicating the problematic situation can be understood as a learning opportunity.
Generativity: F12 I can-Response	Judgments the person makes that indicate the possibility of asking for help to solve a problematic situation.