Bajaj et al., 2018 [41] |
Humans, LT |
Peri-operative: GC + MMF. Manteinance: TAC + MMF CyA + MMF |
YES |
Increase in α-diversity after LT
Decreased abundance after LT of Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella)
Increased abundance after LT of Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae
|
Bhat et al., 2017 [42] |
Rats, normal |
TAC or SIR |
YES |
No difference in α-diversity
No difference in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio
Higher abundance in the SIR and TAC groups of Akkermansia muciniphila, Roseburia, Oscillospira, Mollicutes, Rothia, Micrococcaceae, Actinomycetales and Staphylococcus
|
Bitto et al., 2016 [43] |
Mice, normal aging |
SIR |
YES |
Higher abundance of segmented filamentous bacteria (Candidatus Arthromitus sp.) in the SIR group |
de Lima et al., 2022 [44] |
Rats, PTZ-kindling |
PREDN |
YES |
No change in α-diversity
No difference in the abundance of Firmicutes or Bacteirodetes
Higher abundance in the PREDN 1 mg/kg group (but not in the 5 mg/kg group) of Verrucomicrobia, Saccharibacteria and Actinobacteria
Higher abundance, at the family level, of Porphyromonadaceae, Verrucomicrobiaceae and Clostridiaceae_1 in the PREDN 1 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg groups, and of Erysipelotrichaceae only in the PREDN 1 mg/kg group and of Eubacteriaceae in the PREDN 5 mg/group
Higher abundance, at the genus level, of Lactobacillus, Barnesiella, and Akkermansia in PREDN 5 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg groups and of Ruminococcus only in the 1 mg/kg group
Higher abundance, at the species level, of Muribaculum intestinale and Akkermansia muciniphila in the PREDN 5 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg groups and of Saccharibacteria_genera_incertae_sedis TM7_phylum only in the 5 mg/kg group
|
Flannigan et al., 2018 [45] |
Mice, normal |
MMF |
YES |
Lower α-diversity in the MMF group
Lower abundance in the MMF group at the phylum level of Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia and at genus level of Akkermansia, Parabacteroides and Clostridium
Higher abundance in the MMF group, at the phylum level, of Proteobacteria and at the genus level of Escherichia/Shigella
|
Han et al., 2019 [46] |
Mice, normal |
TAC TAC ± ABX |
YES |
Increase in α-diversity in the TAC group partially reverted by ABX
Decrease in α-diversity with TAC + ABX
Lower abundance of Verrucomicrobia in the TAC group
Higher abundance in the TAC + ABX group of Verrucomicrobia, family Verrucomicrobiaceae, genus Akkermansia
Lower abundance in the TAC + ABX group of Firmicutes, family Lachnospiraceae, genus Coprococcus
Lower Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the TAC + ABX group
|
Han et al., 2021 [47] |
Mice, normal |
SIR |
YES |
Lower abundance in the SIR group at the phylum level of Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes, and Verrucomicrobia, at the family level of Verrucomicrobiaceae and, at the genus level, of Akkermansia
Higher abundance in the SIR group at the phylum level of Proteobacteria, at the family level of Helicobacteriaceae, Desufovibrionaceae and Alcaligenaceae, and, at the genus level, of Sutterella, Desulfovibrio and Helicobacter
|
He et al., 2019 [48] |
Mice, SLE (MRL/lpr mice) |
PRED |
YES |
No difference in α-diversity.
Lower abundance in the PRED group at the phylum level of Proteobacteria and Deferribacteres, and, at genus level, of Rikenella, Mucispirillum, Oscillospira and Bilophila
Higher abundance in the PRED group at the genus level of Prevotella and Anaerostipes
|
Hurez et al., 2015 [49] |
Mice, normal |
SIR |
YES |
Minor differences in the composition of fecal microbiota
Higher abundance in the SIR group of four taxa: Lactobacillus Intestinalis spp., and unclassified Acidobacteriaceae and Rikenellaceae (two taxa)
|
Jia et al., 2019 [50] |
Rats, LT |
CyA |
YES |
Higher α-diversity in the CyA group
Higher abundance in the CyA group, in comparison with controls, of Enterococcus spp.
Lower abundance in the CyA group, in comparison with controls, of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Clostridium cluster XI, and Clostridium cluster XIV
Lower abundance in the CyA group, in comparison with the allograft group, of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Enterobacteriaceae spp., Clostridium cluster I and Clostridium cluster XIV
|
Jiang et al., 2018 [51] |
Rat, LT |
TAC |
YES |
Higher α-diversity in the TAC group
Higher abundance of Bacteroides-Prevotella, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterobacteriaceae in the TAC group
Lower abundance Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Bifidobacterium spp. in the TAC group
|
Jiao et al. 2019 [52] |
Mice, normal |
TAC |
YES |
No difference in α-diversity
Higher abundance in the TAC group of Alistipes, Allobaculum, and Bacteroides
Lower abundance in the TAC group of NK4A136, UCG-014, and Akkermansia
|
Jung et al., 2016 [53] |
Mice, DIO |
SIR |
YES |
No difference in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio
Lower abundance in the non-obese SIR group as compared with non-obese control mice, at the genus level, of Alloprevotella, Ruminococcus, Bifidobacterium, Marvinbryantia, Helicobacter, and Coprobacillus
Lower abundance in the obese SIR group as compared with non-obese control mice, at the genus level, of Turicibacter, unclassified Marinilabiliaceae, Alloprevotella, unclassified Porphyromonadaceae, Ruminococcus, Bifidobacterium, Marvinbryantia, Helicobacter, and Coprobacillus
|
Kamata et al., 2020 [54] |
Humans, AIP |
PREDN |
YES |
No PREDN-induced change in α-diversity
PREDN-induced disappearance of Enterobacteriales (at the order level) and of Klebsiellae at the genus level
PREDN-induced increase in the abundance of Ruminococcus
|
Kang et al., 2019 [55] |
Humans, children with NS |
PRED |
YES |
No change in α-diversity induced by PRED
PRED-induced increase in the abundance of Deinococcus Thermus and Acidobacteria (at the phylum level), and at the genus level of Romboutsia, Stomatobaculum, Cloacibacillus, Howardella, Mobilitalea, Deinococcus, Paracoccus, Stenotrophomonas, Gp1, Kocuria, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Brevundimonas and Lactobacillus bacteria
PRED-induced decrease in the abundance of Finegoldia and Corynebacterium
|
Lähteenmäki et al., 2017 [56] |
Humans, children with HSCT |
CyA+ (MTX and MMF only in 1 patient) |
YES |
Higher abundance in HSCT, at phylum level, of Proteobacteria, and, at the genus level, of Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, Enterobacter, Bacteroides and unclassified genera of Lachnospriracea
Lower abundance in HSCT, at phylum level, of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacterodeites and, at the genus level, of Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Blautia and Faecalibacterium (especially F. prausnitzii)
|
Llorenç et al., 2022 [57] |
Mice, EAU |
MMF |
YES |
Higher α-diversity in the MMF group
Higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the MMF group
Higher abundance, at the genus level, of Muribaculum, Bifidobacterium, Anaerostipes and Firmicutes UGC-005 in the MMF group compared with control mice
Lower abundance, at the genus level, of Bacteroides, Monoglobus, Eisenbergiella and Lachnospiraceae UCG-001 in the MMF group compared with control mice
Higher abundance of Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 in the EAU-MMF group compared with control EAU mice
Lower abundance of Lachnospiraceae UCG-001 in the EAU-MMF group compared with control EAU mice
|
Lyons et al., 2018 [58] |
Mice, experimental colitis |
SIR |
NO |
No change in fecal microbiota induced by SIR |
Pigneur et al., 2019 [59] |
Humans, children with CD |
PRED |
YES |
PRED-induced a marginal increase in a-diversity
PRED increased the abundance at genus level, of Ruminococcus and Bifidobacterium, and at species level, of bacterium M62, A186, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Roseburia intestinalis, Eubacterium and Bifidobacterium bifidum
PRED-decreased, at the genus level, the abundance of Blautia
|
Qiu et al., 2019 [60] |
Humans, TM |
PRED |
YES |
PRED decreased α-diversity
At the phylum level, GC increased Actinobacteria and the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio
At the genus level, GC decreased Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Eubacterium and increased Streptococcus and Geobacillus
|
Robles-Vera et al., 2020 [61] |
Rat, DOCA salt hypertension |
MMF |
YES |
Decrease in α-diversity (vs. DOCA-rats)
Lower abundance in the MMF group, at the phylum level, of Firmicutes and, at genus level, of Lactobacillus and Sutterella
Higher abundance in the MMF group, at the phylum level, of Bacteroidetes
|
Robles-Vera et al., 2021 [62] |
Rats, SHR |
MMF |
YES |
No effect on α-diversity
The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was higher in SHR than in control rats and it was normalized by MMF
Higher abundance in the MMF group in comparison with SHR of the Sutterella genus
Lower abundance in the MMF group in comparison with SHR of the Clostridium genus
Higher abundance, at the phylum level, of Firmicutes and, at genus level, of Lactobacillus in the SHR group, normalized by MMF
Higher abundance, at the phylum level, of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes in the SHR group, normalized by MMF
|
Schepper et al., 2020 [63] |
Mice, GC-induced osteoporosis |
PREDN |
YES |
Lower abundance of Verrucomicobiales and Bacteriodales in the PREDN group
Higher abundance of Clostridiales in the PREDN group
|
Simpson et al., 2022 [33] |
Humans, KT |
TAC + MMF |
YES |
No difference in α-diversity between KTR and controls.
Higher abundance in KTR, at class level, of Gammaproteobacteria, Bacilli and Erysipelotrichia
Lower abundance in KTR, at class level, Actinobacteria and Verrucomicrobiae
|
Sivaraj et al., 2022 [64] |
Humans, LT |
TAC + SIR + PRED |
YES |
Higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in LTR
Higher abundance in LTR at phylum level of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria and, at family level, of Enterobacteriaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Fusobacteriaceae, Lactobacillaceae, and Veillonellaceae at 3 months post-LT and of Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, and Staphylococcaceae after 6 months
In comparison to pre-transplant samples, Firmicutes (in particular Clostridiaceae) were increased 3 months after LT and Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae 6 months post-LT
|
Swarte et al., 2020 [65] |
Human, KT |
CyA (18%) TAC (57%) AZT (9%) MMF (72%) PRED (96%) |
YES |
Lower α-diversity in KTR than in age-matched controls. Changes in α-diversity positively correlated with MMF use
Higher abundance in KTR, at the phylum level, of Proteobacteria, and, at species level of Escherichia coli sp.
Lower abundance in KTR, at the phylum level, of Actinobacteria and, at species level of Bifidobacterium sp., Streptococcus termophylus, Blautia wexlerae and Streptococcus mitis
No difference in firmicutes
|
Taylor et al., 2019 [34] |
Mice, normal |
MMF |
YES |
Different fecal microbiota composition in the MMF group wih dominant bacteria represented, at the class level, by Clostridia, Bacteroidia, and Bacilli after 8 days of treatment and further expansion with continued MMF expansion of Gammaproteobacteria, Erysipelotrichia, and, to a lesser extent, Deltaproteobacteria classes
Higher abundance in the MMF group of Bacteroides vulgatus, Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides caccae, Bacteroides uniformis, Bacteroides ovatus, and Bacteroides nordii
|
Tourret et al., 2017 [66] |
Mice, normal |
PRED TAC MMF EVERO PRED + TAC + MMF |
YES |
-
(1)
FECAL MICROBIOTA: Higher β-diversity in the PRED group. Higher abundance, in the PRED group, at the phylum level, of Firmicutes. Lower abundance in the PRED group at the phylum level, of Bacteroidetes, and, at the order level, of Bacteroidales. Variable, unreproducble effects with other cIMDs
-
(2)
ILEAL MICROBIOTA: depletion of the Clostridium genus in the groups PRED andPRED + TAC + MMF
|
Wang et al., 2021 [67] |
Mice, SLE (MRL/lpr mice) |
PRED |
YES |
Higher α-diversity with PRED
Higher abundance, in the PRED group, at phylum level, of Proteobacteria, and, at genus level, of Parasutterella and Enterorhabdus genus
Lower abundance, in the PRED group, of Rikenella, Christensenella, Ruminococcus, and Intestinimonas
|
Xu et al., 2020 [68] |
Mice, EAE |
SIR |
YES |
-
(1)
α-Diversity was decreased in EAE and normalized by SIR
-
(2)
Different composition of fecal microbiota with or without SIR
-
(3)
Most abundant bacteria in the control group: Bacteroidia, Bacteroidetes, Burkholderiales, Sutterella, Anaerolinaceae.T78, Turicibacteraceae, Turicibacterales, Turicibacter and Bifidobacterium
-
(4)
Most abundant bacteria in the EAE group: Bacteroides, Bacteroidaceae, Rikenellaceae, Dorea, Mycoplasmataceae and Mycoplasmatales
-
(5)
Most abundant bacterial spp in the SIR group: Firmicutes, Oscillospira, Bacteroidales, Allobaculum, Anaerotruncus, Rikenellaceae.AF12, Odoribacteraceae, Odoribacter, Rikenella and Streptococcus
|
Zhang et al., 2018 [69] |
Mice, ST |
TAC |
YES |
No difference in α-diversity
Higher abundance in the TAC group of Allobaculum, Bacteroides, and Lactobacillus
Lower abundance in the TAC group of Clostridium, Ruminococcus, Rikenella, Ruminococcaceae, and Oscillospira
|
Zhang et al., 2021 [70] |
Rat, normal |
PRED |
YES |
No difference in α-diversity
Lower abundance in thePRED group, at the phylum level, of Spirochaetes, at the family level, of Lachnospiraceae, Spirochaetaceae, Desulfovibrionaceae, and Rikenellaceae and at genus level, of Eisenbergiella, Alistipes, and Clostridium XIVb
Higher abundance in the PRED group, at the family level, of Porphyromonadaceae, and at the genus level of Anaerobacterium
|