Table 2.

Associations with NHL for neighborhood deprivation indices from models with no covariates (Level 1 models).

Center	Model	Neighborhood Deprivation Index			DIC
		2000	1990	1980
Detroit	1	1.22 (0.89, 1.73)	-	-	262.8
	2	-	1.14 (0.82, 1.54)	-	253.9
	3	-	-	1.23 (0.96, 1.64)	243.4
	4	1.17 (0.79, 2.01)	1.04 (0.62, 1.55)	-	252.9
	5	1.02 (0.67, 1.51)	-	1.27 (0.94, 1.97)	242.3
	6	-	1.01 (0.64, 1.47)	1.25 (0.93, 1.95)	242.2
	7	1.02 (0.71, 1.42)	1.23 (0.91, 1.81)	1.22 (0.94, 1.72)	244.4
Iowa	1	1.16 (0.94, 1.45)	-	-	453.7
	2	-	1.13 (0.95, 1.44)	-	444.9
	3	-	-	1.43 (1.17, 1.85)	414.5
	4	1.05 (0.81, 1.36)	1.11 (0.89, 1.50)	-	444.4
	5	1.07 (0.85, 1.38)	-	1.41 (1.12, 1.82)	414.2
	6	-	1.06 (0.87, 1.36)	1.42 (1.15, 1.85)	409.2
	7	0.75 (0.55, 0.97)	1.11 (0.88, 1.41)	1.49 (1.22, 1.92)	412.3
Los Angeles	1	1.01 (0.84, 1.19)	-	-	385.9
	2	-	1.02 (0.85, 1.21)	-	379.7
	3	-	-	0.96 (0.78, 1.17)	353.4
	4	0.96 (0.70, 1.25)	1.06 (0.80, 1.47)	-	372.4
	5	1.04 (0.84, 1.32)	-	0.96 (0.76, 1.17)	345.5
	6	-	1.07 (0.85, 1.40)	0.89 (0.68, 1.14)	346.9
	7	1.01 (0.73, 1.37)	1.09 (0.81, 1.54)	0.91 (0.69, 1.15)	340.3
Seattle	1	1.05 (0.92, 1.22)	-	-	467.2
	2	-	1.06 (0.91, 1.25)	-	440.9
	3	-	-	1.13 (0.97, 1.34)	414.3
	4	0.98 (0.78, 1.20)	1.08 (0.87, 1.38)	-	440.8
	5	1.03 (0.87, 1.23)	-	1.13 (0.96, 1.38)	409.5
	6	-	1.00 (0.82, 1.21)	1.10 (0.92, 1.36)	397.6
	7	1.03 (0.84, 1.27)	0.98 (0.78, 1.23)	1.10 (0.91, 1.36)	397.6

Note: Quantities in the table represent posterior mean and 95% credible interval for the deprivation index odds ratio. Statistically significant associations are presented in bold text. DIC stands for deviance information criterion, where lower values indicate better-fitting models. Models (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) estimated neighborhood deprivation indices in (2000, 1990, 1980, 2000 and 1990, 2000 and 1980, 1990 and 1980, 2000 and 1990 and 1980), respectively.