Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2023 May 27;88:102852. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102852

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Distribution of quality scores given by two expert raters on the FOV extension quality of 100 random NLST scans with moderate to severe tissue truncation. The quality score system was defined from 1 (exceptional) to 9 (poor). As none of the sampled scans was assigned with score higher than 6 (Failed), we reduce the range as from 1 to 6 in the confusion matrix plot.