Table 7.

Differential Effects of Multiple-Behavior Interventions Related to Gay/bisexual or MSM Representation and Being Young Adults Across Countries

Variable	Disadvantaged group status
	Gay/bisexual or MSM representation		Youne adult
		b (SE)	df	b (SE)	df
	(Cluster = 89, k = 415)		(Cluster = 300, k = 1261)
Intercept	−0.24 (0.25)	9.48	−0.16 (0.33)	30.86
Intervention type: MBI	0.63** (0.19)	8.73	0.25 (0.31)	41.74
Intervention type: PC	0.5 (0.35)	9.51	0.07 (0.34)	36.40
Disadvantaged group status	−0.00 (0.00)	11.63	−0.01 (0.01)	31.47
Disadvantaged group status × Intervention type: MBI	−0.01* (0.00)	16.77	−0.01 (0.01)	51.51
Disadvantaged group status × Intervention type: PC	−0.01* (0.00)	13.44	−0.01 (0.01)	29.53
Covariates:
Average age	0.00 (0.00)	29.11	-	-
Percentages of females	−0.01* (0.00)	25.71	0.00 (0.00)	127.03
Expert facilitator	0.05 (0.12)	40.71	0.15* (0.07)	161.79
Medical recruitment setting	0.12 (0.15)	32.50	0.08 (0.06)	168.61
Culturally appropriate	0.06 (0.09)	17.83	−0.06 (0.06)	105.75
Modified covariate for potential biases	1.13* (00.4)	22.11	0.25 (0.33)	29.78
I2	87.12		94.56

Note. Report of the robust variance estimation meta-regression using single-behavior intervention as the reference (i.e., intercept). b = unstandardized coefficient; SE = standard error; p = p value; k = the number of effect sizes; gay/bisexual or MSM representation = percentage of gay/bisexual or MSM in the sample; average age = average age of the sample; percentages of females = percentages of female participants; expert facilitator = the intervention program was facilitated by experts (e.g., clinical psychologists); medical recruitment setting = participant recruited from medical settings; culturally appropriate = the intervention was culturally appropriate; clinical delivery setting = the intervention was delivered in clinical settings; I² = proportion of variance due to between-group heterogeneity.

^†p < .10,

^*p < .05,

^**p < .01,

^***p < .001