Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2023 Jul 6;91(10):574–595. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000827

Table 8.

Differential Effects of Multiple-Behavior Interventions Related to Minority Group Status and Being Young Adults in the US

Variable Minority group status
Non-White representation Black representation Latinx representation

b (SE) df b (SE) df b (SE) df
(Cluster = 174, k = 737) (Cluster = 151, k = 604) (Cluster = 139, k = 584)
Intercept 0.16 (0.19) 24.03 −0.11 (0.27) 30.57 0.03 (0.33) 36.29
Intervention type: MBI −0.36 (0.18) 19.33 −0.21 (0.22) 27.49 −0.37 (0.21) 31.63
Intervention type: PC −0.3 (0.25) 10.22 −0.51 (0. 29) 14.79 −0.26 (0.27) 18.91
Disadvantaged group status 0.00 (0.00) 17.29 0.00 (0.00) 15.00 −0.01 (0.01) 3.51
Disadvantaged group status × Intervention type: MBI 0.00 (0.00) 25.31 0.00 (0.00) 23.19 0.01 (0.01) 6.00
Disadvantaged group status × Intervention type: PC 0.00 (0.00) 17.12 0.01 (0.01) 22.64 0.00 (0.01) 2.78
Covariates:
 Average age 0.01** (0.00) 58.94 0.01** (0.00) 70.94 0.01* (0.00) 61.70
 Percentages of females 0.00 (0.00) 59.56 0.00 (0.00) 51.83 0.00 (0.00) 51.80
 Expert facilitator 0.11 (0.07) 88.47 0.08 (0.09) 74.72 0.16 (0.09) 68.62
 Medical recruitment setting 0.03 (0.07) 81.90 0.01 (0.08) 73.10 −0.01 (0.08) 66.56
 Culturally appropriate 0.00 (0.00) 47.87 0.01 (0.08) 43.14 −0.01 (0.09) 42.03
Modified covariate for potential biases 0.4 (0.45) 18.49 0.6 (0.64) 14.36 0.66 (0.66) 14.14
I2 93.13 94.16 94.22
Other representation Gay/bisexual MSM representation Young adult
b (SE) df b (SE) df b (SE) df

(Cluster = 138, k = 573) (Cluster = 59, k = 252) (Cluster = 174, k = 737)
Intercept −0.09 (0.33) 42.67 −0.02 (0.21) 4.43 −0.46 (0.51) 16.99
Intervention type: MBI −0.10 (0.20) 28.82 0.28 (0.14) 7.37 0.36 (0.45) 20.17
Intervention type: PC −0.04 (0.26) 17.72 0.05 (0.56) 4.09 0.39 (0.47) 21.45
Disadvantaged group status 0.00 (0.00) 2.43 −0.00 (0.00) 5.71 0.02 (0.01) 18.59
Disadvantaged group status × Intervention type: MBI −0.00 (0.01) 4.95 −0.00 (0.00) 11.92 −0.01 (0.01) 29.20
Disadvantaged group status × Intervention type: PC −0.01 (0.01) 3.75 −0.00 (0.00) 5.60 −0.02 (0.01) 21.41
Covariates:
 Average age 0.01* (0.00) 52.90 −0.01 (0.00) 16.29 - -
 Percentages of females 0.00 (0.00) 53.41 0.00 (0.00) 11.39 0.00 (0.00) 60.13
 Expert facilitator 0.13 (0.10) 74.80 0.15 (0.08) 20.72 0.1 (0.07) 89.51
 Medical recruitment setting 0.04 (0.09) 68.14 −0.05 (0.07) 15.65 0.04 (0.07) 73.95
 Culturally appropriate −0.04 (0.10) 44.13 −0.01 (0.11) 6.04 0.00 (0.00) 43.52
Modified covariate for potential biases 0.51 (0.70) 12.78 0.8* (036) 17.88 0.35 (0.43) 20.01
I2 95.01 79.01 93.09

Note. Report of the robust variance estimation meta-regression using single-behavior intervention as the reference (i.e., intercept). b = unstandardized coefficient; SE = standard error; df = degrees of freedom; p = p value; k = the number of effect sizes; average age = average age of the sample; percentages of females = percentages of female participants; expert facilitator = the intervention program was facilitated by experts (e.g., clinical psychologists); medical recruitment setting = participant recruited from medical settings; culturally appropriate = the intervention was culturally appropriate; clinical delivery setting = the intervention was delivered in clinical settings; I2 = proportion of variance due to between-group heterogeneity.

p < .10,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001