Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: Immunity. 2023 Jul 13;56(8):1825–1843.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.06.017

Figure 6. Entrapped TAMs in hypoxic zones express immunosuppressive markers.

Figure 6.

(A) UMAP plot of TAM subclusters in GL261.

(B) Violin plots of marker gene expression in TAM subcluster 3 (hypoxic) vs. other subclusters combined.

(C) Heatmap showing DEGs in hypoxic TAMs, with top upregulated DEGs labeled.

(D, E) Representative IF images from GL261 transplants (n=3) show expression of CD68 or CD206 in relation to hypoxia markers GLUT1 or Pimo.

(F) IF images show expression of immunotolerance markers Arginase-1 (Arg1) and CD206 in sequestered TAMs in hypoxic zones (asterisks). Quantification: n=10 randomly selected tumor areas from 3 mice per condition.

(G) Schematic of TAM patterning in hypoxic zones of GBM.

(H) IF image and quantifications of CD8+ CTLs or FOXP3+ Tregs in relation to hypoxic cores (asterisks) outlined by UnaG+ cells (dashed lines) of GL261 at 4 wks post-transplant. n=15 tumor areas from 3 mice per group.

(I) Multiplex 5-color IF imaging from n=3 tumor sections show localization of CTLs (CD8a+) and TAMs (CD68+) in relation to hypoxic zones (UnaG+) or blood vessels (PECAM1+).

(J, K) IF images of fresh frozen human GBM sections stained for immune cell markers for TAMs or T cells and GLUT1 (asterisks) in hypoxic or adjacent non-hypoxic zones. DAPI for nuclear staining. Enlarged images of boxed area in (J) are shown on right.

Unpaired t-test (F, H); *P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

See also Figures S5S7.