Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jul 18;132:107297. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107297

Table 2.

Hypotheses

Aim 1: Effectiveness Prevalence of MDD in the 6 months after birth will be lower in ROSE than ECAU for:
1a. people not at increased risk of PPD (defined using selective prevention)
1b. people at increased risk of PPD (defined using selective prevention)
1c. people not at increased risk of PPD (defined using indicated prevention)
1c. people not at increased risk of PPD (defined using indicated prevention)
1e. the sample as a whole (universal prevention)
We will also explore whether ROSE prevents antenatal depression cases (universal)
Aim 2: Cost-outcome comparison Universal prevention will have lower net cost than selective or indicated prevention
2a. From a societal perspective
2b. From a health system perspective
Aim 5: Mechanisms The effect of ROSE on PPD in the sample as a whole will be mediated by (a) instrumental support and (b) perceived stress.

Note: Aims 1, 2, and 5 have hypotheses (shown above). Aims 34 focus on parameter estimation (false negative rates, scalability indicators).